Skip to main content
Log in

Computational intelligence determines effective rationality

  • Published:
International Journal of Automation and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationality is a fundamental concept in economics. Most researchers will accept that human beings are not fully rational. Herbert Simon suggested that we are “bounded rational”. However, it is very difficult to quantify “bounded rationality”, and therefore it is difficult to pinpoint its impact to all those economic theories that depend on the assumption of full rationality. Ariel Rubinstein proposed to model bounded rationality by explicitly specifying the decision makers’ decision-making procedures. This paper takes a computational point of view to Rubinstein’s approach. From a computational point of view, decision procedures can be encoded in algorithms and heuristics. We argue that, everything else being equal, the effective rationality of an agent is determined by its computational power — we refer to this as the computational intelligence determines effective rationality (CIDER) theory. This is not an attempt to propose a unifying definition of bounded rationality. It is merely a proposal of a computational point of view of bounded rationality. This way of interpreting bounded rationality enables us to (computationally) reason about economic systems when the full rationality assumption is relaxed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. F. Fama. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 383–417, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Black. Noise. Journal of Finance, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 529–543, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kahneman, M. W. Riepe. Aspects of Investor Psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 52–65, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Shiller. Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividents? Americal Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 421–436, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Shleifer. Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance, Oxford University Press, UK, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, D. B. Shmoys. The Travelling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Lin, B. W. Kernighan. An Effective Heuristic Algorithm for the Traveling-Salesman Problem. Operations Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 498–516, 1973.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Voudouris, E. P. K. Tsang. Guided Local Search and Its Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, vol.113, no. 2, pp. 469–499, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. H. A. Simon. Models of Man, Wiley, New York, USA, 1957.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, MIT Press, USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Rubinstein. Modeling Bounded Rationality, MIT Press, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Newell, H. A. Simon. Human Problem Solving, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Russell, P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, NJ, USA, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Rossi, P. Van Beek, T. Walsh. Handbook of Constraint Programming, Elsevier, 2006.

  15. E. P. K. Tsang. Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction, Academic Press, London and San Diego, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. K. Burke, G. Kendall. Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, Springer, New York, USA, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Hoos, E. P. K. Tsang. Local Search for Constraint Satisfaction. Handbook of Constraint Programming, F. Rossi, P. Van Beek, T. Walsh (eds.), Elsevier, pp. 245–277, 2006.

  18. P. Larranaga, J. A. Lozano. Estimation of Distribution Algorithms: A New Tool for Evolutionary Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Reading, Addison-Wesley Pubulish Company, MA, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Rubinstein. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 97–110, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Muthoo. Bargaining Theory with Applications, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Jin, E. P. K. Tsang. Co-adaptive Strategies for Sequential Bargaining Problems with Discount Factors and Outside Options. In Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 2149–2156, 2006.

  24. E. P. K. Tsang, N. Jin. An Incentive Method to Handle Constraints in Evolutionary Algorithms with a Case Study. In Proceedings of European Conference on Genetic Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Budapest, vol. 3905, pp. 133–144, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Gosling, N. Jin, E. P. K. Tsang. Games, Supply Chains and Automatic Strategy Discovery Using Evolutionary Computation. Handbook of Research on Nature-inspired Computing for Economics and Management, J. P. Rennard (ed.), Idea Group Publishing, vol 2,Chapter 38, pp. 572–588, 2006.

  26. R. Selten. Boundedly Rational Qualitative Reasoning on Comparative Statics. Bounded Rationality, the Adaptive Toolbox, G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten (eds.), MIT Press, USA, pp. 1–8, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. A. Kabadjova, A. Krause, E. P. K. Tsang. Competition among Payment Networks Using Generalized Population Based Incremental Learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computing in Economics and Finance, Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 22–24, 2006.

  28. B. A. Kabadjova. Artificial Payment Card Market: An Agent Based Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, Centre for Computational Finance and Economic Agents (CCFEA), University of Esesx, UK, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Baluja. Population-based Incremental Learning: A Method for Integrating Genetic Search Based Function Optimisation and Competitive Learning, Technical Report CS-94-163, Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Kern. Parameter Adaptation in Heuristic Search: A Population-based Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex, UK, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Gosling, E. P. K. Tsang. Tackling the Simple Supply Chain Model. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 2179–2186, 2006.

  32. S. Martinez-Jaramillo. Artificial Financial Markets: An Agent Based Approach to Reproduce Stylized Facts and to Study the Red Queen Effect, Ph. D. dissertation, Centre for Computational Finance and Economic Agents (CCFEA), University of Essex, UK, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Martinez-Jaramillo, E. P. K. Tsang. An Heterogeneous, Endogenous and Co-evolutionary GP-based Financial Market. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, to be published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward P. K. Tsang.

Additional information

Edward P. K. Tsang is a professor in computer science at University of Essex. He is also the deputy director of Centre for Computational Finance and Economic Agents (CCFEA) and a founding member of the Centre for Computational Intelligence at University of Essex.

He has broad interest in business application of artificial intelligence, including, computational finance, computational economics, and constraint satisfaction. Main techniques used included heuristic search, optimization, and evolutionary computation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsang, E.P.K. Computational intelligence determines effective rationality. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 5, 63–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-008-0063-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-008-0063-6

Keywords

Navigation