Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Computational Model for Measuring Trust in Mobile Social Networks Using Fuzzy Logic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Automation and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale mobile social networks (MSNs) facilitate communications through mobile devices. The users of these networks can use mobile devices to access, share and distribute information. With the increasing number of users on social networks, the large volume of shared information and its propagation has created challenges for users. One of these challenges is whether users can trust one another. Trust can play an important role in users’ decision making in social networks, so that, most people share their information based on their trust on others, or make decisions by relying on information provided by other users. However, considering the subjective and perceptive nature of the concept of trust, the mapping of trust in a computational model is one of the important issues in computing systems of social networks. Moreover, in social networks, various communities may exist regarding the relationships between users. These connections and communities can affect trust among users and its complexity. In this paper, using user characteristics on social networks, a fuzzy clustering method is proposed and the trust between users in a cluster is computed using a computational model. Moreover, through the processes of combination, transition and aggregation of trust, the trust value is calculated between users who are not directly connected. Results show the high performance of the proposed trust inference method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. B. Chang, T. Xu, Q. Liu, E. H. Chen. Study on information diffusion analysis in social networks and its applications. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol.15, no.4, pp.377–401, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11633-018-1124-0.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Hao, G. Y. Min, M. Lin, C. Q. Luo, L. T. Yang. Mobi-FuzzyTrust: An efficient fuzzy trust inference mechanism in mobile social networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol.25, no. 11, pp.2944–2955, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2013.309.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. J. Jiang, G. J. Wang, J. Wu. Generating trusted graphs for trust evaluation in online social networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol.31, pp.48–58, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2012.06.010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Tavakolifard. On some Challenges for Online Trust and Reputation Systems, Ph. D. dissertation, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norway, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. U. Can, B. Alatas. A new direction in social network analysis: Online social network analysis problems and applications. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol.535, Article number 122372, 2019. DOI: 10. 1016/j.physa.2019.122372.

  6. J. Golbeck. Trust on the World Wide Web: A survey. Foundations and Trends® in Web Science, vol.1, no. 2, pp. 131–197, 2006. DOI: 10.1561/1800000006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Sherchan, S. Nepal, C. Paris. A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Computing Surveys, vol.45, no.4, Article number 47, 2013. DOI: 10.1145/2501654.2501661.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. P. Marsh. Formalising Trust as A Computational Concept, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Stirling, UK, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope, [Online], Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm7ab-stract_id=1313405, December 5, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Zhang, A. Durresi. Trust management framework for social networks. I. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 1042–1047, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2012.6364031.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Dumbill. XML Watch: Finding friends with XML and RDF. IBM Developers Works, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. H. Chen, G. J. Wang, W. J. Jia. fe-FuzzyTrust: Efficient trust computation for large-scale mobile social networks using a fuzzy implicit social graph. Information Sci-ences, vol.318, pp. 123–143, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014. 09.058.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. A. Parand, F. Matinfar, F. Mehdikhanloo. A new approach for trust computing in mobile social networks. New Media Studies, vol. 5, pp. 31–62, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. L. Cheng, X. L. Xu, B. Z. Gao. METrust: A mutual evaluation-based trust model for P2P networks. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11633-012-0617-5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. J. Fan, S. L. Yang, H. Perros, J. Pei. A multi-dimensional trust-aware cloud service selection mechanism based on evidential reasoning approach. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol.12, no. 2, pp. 208–219, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11633-014-0840-3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. H. Aghdam, M. Ashtiani, M. A. Azgomi. An uncer-tainty-aware computational trust model considering the co-existence of trust and distrust in social networks. In-formation Sciences, vol.513, pp. 465–503, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.067.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Calio, A. Tagarelli. Complex influence propagation based on trust-aware dynamic linear threshold models. Applied Network Science, vol.4, Article number 14, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s41109-019-0124-5.

  18. A. Altaf, H. Abbas, F. Iqbal, A. Derhab. Trust models of internet of smart things: A survey, open issues, future directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol.137, pp. 93–111, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2019. 02.024.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Veloso, F. Leal, B. Malheiro, F. Moreira. Distributed trust & reputation models using blockchain technologies for tourism crowdsourcing platforms. Procedia Computer Science, vol.160, pp. 457–560, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs. 2019.11.065.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Massa. A survey of trust use and modeling in real online systems. Examining the Concepts, Issues, and Implications of Internet Trolling, J. Bishop, Ed., USA: IGI Global, pp. 51–83, 2007. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2803-8.ch012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Ruohomaa, L. Kutvonen. Trust management survey. I. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management, IEEE, Berlin, Germany, pp. 77–92, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/114297606.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Hoffman, D. Zage, C. Nita-Rotaru. A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems. ACM Com-puting Surveys, vol.42, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2009. DOI: 10.1145/ 1592451.1592452.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. F. Ruan, A. Durresi. A trust management framework for clouds. Computer Communications, vol. 144, pp. 124–131, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.05.018.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. F. Ruan, A. Durresi. A survey of trust management sys-tems for online social communities - Trust modeling, trust inference and attacks. Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 106, pp. 150–163, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.042.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Abdul-Rahman, S. Hailes. Supporting trust in virtual communities. I. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Maui, USA, Article number 9, 2000. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2000. 926814.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, H. Garcia-Molina. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. I. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 640–651, 2003. DOI: 10.1145/775152.775242.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. N. Ziegler, J. Golbeck. Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decision Support Systems, vol.43, no. 2, pp.460–475, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Ma, Z. G. Hu. Cloud service recommendation based on trust measurement using ternary interval numbers. I. Proceedings of International Conference on Smart Com-puting, IEEE, Hong Kong, China, pp. 21–24, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2014.7043834.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. C. Wei, F. C. He. Research on security trust measure model based on fuzzy mathematics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 128, pp. 139–143, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.034.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. L. Sun, W. Yu, Z. Han, K. J. R. Liu. Information theoretic framework of trust modeling and evaluation for ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.24, no. 2, pp.305–317, 2006. DOI: 10.1109/JSAC. 2005.861389.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Fang, G. B. Guo, J. Zhang. Multi-faceted trust and distrust prediction for recommender systems. Decision Support Systems, vol.71, pp.37–47, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. D. O. Anderson, M. B. Ye. Recent advances in the mod-elling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks. International Journal of Automation and Comput-ing, vol.16, no.2, pp. 129–149, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11633-019-1169-8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. B. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Z. Zhang, E. P. Lim. Reputa-tionPro: The efficient approaches to contextual transaction trust computation in E-commerce environments. ACM Transactions on the Web, vol.9, no. 1, Article number 2, 2015. DOI: 10.1145/2697390.

    Google Scholar 

  34. X. M. Zheng, Y. Wang, M. A. Orgun, G. F. Liu, H. B. Zhang. Social context-aware trust prediction in social networks. I. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing, Springer, Paris, France, pp. 527–534, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45391-9_45.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Gambetta. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, New York, USA: Basil Blackwell, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. C. Liu, Q. Yang, H. G. Wang, X. D. Lin, M. P. Wittie. Assessment of multihop interpersonal trust in social net-works by three-valued subjective logic. I. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE, Toronto, Canada, pp. 1698–1706, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/IN-FOCOM.2014.6848107.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Ries. Certain trust: A trust model for users and agents. I. Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Comput-ing, ACM, Seoul, Korea, pp. 1599–1604, 2007. DOI: 10.1145/1244002.1244342.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Golbeck. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. ACM Transactions on the Web, vol.3, no.4, Article number 12, 2009. DOI: 10.1145/1594173.1594174.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Q. Shambour, J. Lu. A trust-semantic fusion-based recom-mendation approach for e-business applications. Decision Support Systems, vol.54, no. 1, pp.768–780, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. Golzardi, A. Sheikhahmadi, A. Abdollahpouri. Detection of trust links on social networks using dynamic features. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol.527, Article number 121269, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.121269.

    Google Scholar 

  41. X. Y. Guo, Q. Guo, R. D. Li, J. G. Liu. Long-term memory of rating behaviors for the online trust formation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 508, pp. 254–264, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.106.

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. J. Chen, J. Gao. A trust-based recommendation method using network diffusion processes. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol.506, pp.679–691, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.089.

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. J. Wang, W. J. Jiang, J. Wu, Z. L. Xiong. Fine-grained feature-based social influence evaluation in online social networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol.25, no.9, pp.2286–2296, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/ TPDS.2013.135.

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. Kim, S. O. Park. Group affinity based social trust model for an intelligent movie recommender system. Multime-dia Tools and Applications, vol.64, no.2, pp.505–516, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-011-0897-8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Kim, J. Seo, S. Noh, S. Y. Han. Identity management-based social trust model for mediating information sharing and privacy enhancement. Security and Communication Networks, vol.5, no.8, pp.887–897, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/sec.379.

    Google Scholar 

  46. G. J. Wang, J. Wu. Multi-dimensional evidence-based trust management with multi-trusted paths. Future Generation Computer Systems, vol.27, no.5, pp.529–538, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2010.04.015.

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Falcone, G. Pezzulo, C. Castelfranchi. A fuzzy approach to a belief-based trust computation. I. Proceedings of AAMAS International Workshop on Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice, Springer, Bologna, Italy, pp. 73–86, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36609-17.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. V. Kant, K. K. Bharadwaj. Fuzzy computational models of trust and distrust for enhanced recommendations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no.4, pp. 332–365, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/int.21579.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. M. Blin. Fuzzy relations in group decision theory. Journal of Cybernetics, vol.4, no. 2, pp. 17–22, 1974. DOI: 10.1080/01969727408546063.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. L. A. Zadeh. Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Information Sciences, vol.3, no.2, pp. 177–200, 1971. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-0255(71)80005-1.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. E. H. Erikson. Childhood and Society. London, UK: W.W.Norton & Company, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  52. E. H. Erikson. Childhood and Society. London, UK: W.W.Norton & Company, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. D. Lewis, A. Weigert. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, vol.63, no.4, pp.967–985, 1985. DOI: 10.2307/ 2578601.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Allameh Tabataba’i University. The anonymous people who helped us to perform the empirical study are appreciated. Specially, Miss Mehdikhanloo is appreciated for providing the Saadi dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, 1489684511, Iran

    Farzam Matinfar

Authors
  1. Farzam Matinfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzam Matinfar.

Additional information

Farzam Matinfar received the B.Eng., M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in computer engineering from Isfahan University, Iran in 2004, 2008, and 2014 respectively. He is an assistant professor at Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran. His research interests include semantic web and social networks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matinfar, F. A Computational Model for Measuring Trust in Mobile Social Networks Using Fuzzy Logic. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 17, 812–821 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-020-1232-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-020-1232-5

Keywords