Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking an ROC partial area index for evaluating the classification performance at a high specificity range

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Advances in Data Analysis and Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is valuable for evaluating the classification performance described by the entire ROC curve in many fields including decision making and medical diagnosis. However, this can be misleading when clinical tasks demand a restricted specificity range. The partial area under a portion of the ROC curve (\({ pAUC}\)) has more practical relevance in such situations, but it is usually transformed to overcome some drawbacks and improve its interpretation. The standardized \({ pAUC}\) (\({ SpAUC}\)) index is considered as a meaningful relative measure of predictive accuracy. Nevertheless, this \({ SpAUC}\) index might still show some limitations due to ROC curves crossing the diagonal line, and to the problem when comparing two tests with crossing ROC curves in the same restricted specificity range. This paper provides an alternative \({ pAUC}\) index which overcomes these limitations. Tighter bounds for the \({ pAUC}\) of an ROC curve are derived, and then a modified \({ pAUC}\) index for any restricted specificity range is established. In addition, the proposed tighter partial area index (\({ TpAUC}\)) is also shown for classifier when high specificity must be clinically maintained. The variance of the \({ TpAUC}\) is also studied analytically and by simulation studies in a theoretical framework based on the most typical assumption of a binormal model, and estimated by using nonparametric bootstrap resampling in the empirical examples. Simulated and real datasets illustrate the practical utility of the \({ TpAUC}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker SG, Pinsky PF (2001) A proposed design and analysis for comparing digital and analog mammography: special receiver operating characteristic methods for cancer screening. J Am Stat Assoc 96:421–428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baker SG (2003) The central role of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in evaluating tests for the early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:511–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canty A, Ripley B (2016) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-18

  • Dokoumetzidis A, Macheras P (2000) On the use of partial AUC as an early exposure metric. Eur J Pharm Sci 10:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman DD, Alf E (1968) Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory—a direct solution. Psychometrika 33:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer AJ (1997) In pursuit of a piece of the ROC. Radiology 202:621–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng J (2005) Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a primer review article. Acad Radiol 12:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley JA (1988) The robustness of the “binormal” assumption used in fitting ROC curves. Med Decis Mak 8:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K (2016) Asymptotic comparison of semi-supervised and supervised linear discriminant functions for heteroscedastic normal populations. Adv Data Anal Classif. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-016-0266-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Escobar M (2008) Nonparametric statistical inference method for partial areas under receiver operating characteristic curves, with application to genomic studies. Stat Med 27:5291–5308

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herron JM, Bender TM, Campbell WL, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Gur D (2000) Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology 215:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis SL, Metz CE (2012) An analytic expression for the binormal partial area under the ROC curve. Acad Radiol 19:1491–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishwaran H, Rao JS, Kogalur UB (2013) spikeslab: prediction and variable selection using spike and slab regression. R package version 1.1.5

  • Komori O, Eguchi S (2010) A boosting method for maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve. BMC Bioinform 11:314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LHN, Choi C, Gershkovich P, Barr AM, Horner WG, Procyshym RM (2016) Proposing the use of partial AUC as an adjunctive measure in establishing bioequivalence between deltoid and gluteal administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 41:659–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CR, Liao CT, Liu JP (2008) A non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves. Stat Med 27:1762–1776

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Gur D (2013) On use of partial area under the ROC curve for evaluation of diagnostic performance. Stat Med 32:3449–3458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McClish DK (1989) Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve. Med Decis Mak 9:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil BJ, Hanley JA (1984) Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Mak 4:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 143:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Obuchowski NA (2005) Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists. ROC analysis. Am J Roentgenol 184:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH (2004) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 5:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe MS (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe MS, Longton G, Anderson GL, Schummer M (2003) Selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments. Biometrics 59:133–142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson ML, Zuchini W (1989) On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Stat Med 8:1277–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L (2010) Confidence interval estimation of partial area under curve based on combined biomarkers. Comput Stat Data Anal 54:466–472

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walter SD (2005) The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Stat Med 24:2025–2040

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Chang YCI (2011) Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores. Biostatistics 12:369–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK (2002) Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zou KH, Liu A, Bandos AI, Ohno-Machado L, Rockette HE (2011) Statistical evaluation of diagnostic performance: topics in ROC analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two reviewers, Associate Editor and the Coordinating Editor for their constructive suggestions, which have improved the presentation of this paper. The authors would also like to acknowledge Prof. A.I. Bandos by his help for the simulation process, and the research teams of Methods for Analysis of Diagnostic Performance at the University of Pittsburgh, and Diagnostic and Biomarkers Statistical Center, for providing the datasets. This work was partially supported by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness/FEDER under Grant TIN2014-53749-C2-2R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juana-María Vivo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 43 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (docx 51 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivo, JM., Franco, M. & Vicari, D. Rethinking an ROC partial area index for evaluating the classification performance at a high specificity range. Adv Data Anal Classif 12, 683–704 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-017-0295-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-017-0295-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation