Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Detecting academic experts by topic-sensitive link analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of academic expert finding is concerned with finding the experts on a named research field. It has many real-world applications and has recently attracted much attention. However, the existing methods are not versatile and suitable for the special needs from academic areas where the co-authorship and the citation relation play important roles in judging researchers’ achievements. In this paper, we propose and develop a flexible data schema and a topic-sensitive co-pagerank algorithmcombined with a topic model for solving this problem. The main idea is to measure the authors’ authorities by considering topic bias based on their social networks and citation networks, and then, recommending expert candidates for the questions. To infer the association between authors and topics, we draw a probability model from the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model. We further propose several techniques such as reasoning the interested topics of the query and integrating ranking metrics to order the practices. Our experiments show that the proposed strategies are all effective to improve the retrieval accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang H, Zhai C. Probabilistic models for expert finding. In: Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on IR Research (ECIR’07). Rome: Springer, 2007, 418–430

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balog K, de Rijke M. Determining expert profiles (with an application to expert finding). In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’07). Hyderabad: Professional Book Center, 2007, 2657–2662

    Google Scholar 

  3. Macdonald C, Ounis I. Voting for candidates: adapting data fusion techniques for an expert search task. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’06). Arlington: ACM Press, 2006, 387–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Balog K, de Rijke M. Associating people and documents. In: Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on IR Research (ECIR’08). Glasgow: Springer, 2008, 296–308

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balog K, Azzopardi L, de Rijke M. Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’06). Seattle: ACM Press, 2006, 43–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Petkova D, Croft W B. Hierarchical language models for expert finding in enterprise corpora. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 2008, 17(1): 5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCallum A, Corrada-Emmanuel A, Wang X. Topic and role discovery in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’05). Ediburgh: Professional Book Center, 2005, 786–791

    Google Scholar 

  8. Serdyukov P, Hiemstra D. Modeling documents as mixtures of persons for expert finding. In: Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on IR Research (ECIR’08). Glasgow: Springer, 2008, 309–320

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson M L, Van de Sompel H. Coauthorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 2005, 41(6): 1462–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts B R. Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(3): 435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nie Z Q, Zhang Y Z, Wen J R, Ma W Y. Object-level ranking: bringing order to web objects. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’05). Chiba: ACM Press, 2005, 567–574

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nie Z Q, Wen J R, Ma W Y. Object-level vertical search. In: Proceedings of Third Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’07). Asilomar, CA, USA: Online Proceedings, 2007, 235–246

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(Jan.): 993–1022

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Balmin A, Hristidis V, Papakonstantinou Y. ObjectRank: authoritybased keyword search in databases. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’04). Toronto: Morgan Kaufmann, 2004, 564–575

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’98). Brisbane: ACM Press, 1998, 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen P, Xie H, Maslov S, Redner S. Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(1): 8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. XiW S, Zhang B Y, Chen Z, et al. Link fusion: a unified link analysis framework for multi-type interrelated data objects. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’04). New York: ACM Press, 2004, 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haveliwala T H. Topic-sensitive pagerank: a context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge Discovery and Engineering, 2003, 15(4): 784–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths T L, Steyvers M. Finding scientific topics. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101: 5228–5235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giles C L, Bollacker K D, Lawrence S. Citeseer: an automatic citation indexing system. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’98). Pittsburgh: ACM Press, 1998, 89–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Ackerman M S, Adamic L. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’07). Banff: ACM Press, 2007, 221–230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Veldhuis R. The centroid of the symmetrical Kullback-Leibler distance. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2002, 9(3): 96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strohman T, Metzler D, Turtle H, Croft WB. Indri: a language modelbased search engine for complex queries. Technical report IR-407, University of Massachusett, 2005

  24. Carrington P J, Scott J, Wasserman S, et al. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China

    Hao Wu, Yijian Pei & Jiang Yu

Authors
  1. Hao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yijian Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, H., Pei, Y. & Yu, J. Detecting academic experts by topic-sensitive link analysis. Front. Comput. Sci. China 3, 445–456 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0038-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0038-y

Keywords