Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An alternative approach to characterize the topology of complex networks and its application in epidemic spreading

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the mean-field approach, epidemic spreading has been well studied. However, the mean-field approach cannot show the detailed contagion process, which is important in the control of epidemic. To fill this gap, we present a novel approach to study how the topological structure of complex network influences the concrete process of epidemic spreading. After transforming the network structure into hierarchical layers, we introduce a set of new parameters, i.e., the average fractions of degree for outgoing, ingoing, and remaining in the same layer, to describe the infection process. We find that this set of parameters are closely related to the degree distribution and the clustering coefficient but are more convenient than them in describing the process of epidemic spreading. Moreover, we find that the networks with exponential distribution have slower spreading speed than the networks with power-law degree distribution. Numerical simulations have confirmed the theoretical predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert R, Barabasi A L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74: 47–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, et al. Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 2006, 424: 175–308

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Epidemic spreading in scale-free netwoks. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 86: 3200–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Joo J, Lebowitz J L. Behavior of susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemics on heterogeneous networks with saturation. Physical Review E, 2004, 69: 066105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barthelemy M, Barrat A, Pastor-Satorras R, et al. Dynamical patterns of epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2005, 235: 275–288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng D F, Hui PM, Trimper S, et al. Epidemics and dimensionality in hierarchical networks. Physica A, 2005, 352: 659–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Z, Lai Y C, Ye N. Propagation and immunization of infection on general networks with both homogeneous and heterogeneous components. Physical Review E, 2003, 67: 031911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-Naim E, Krapivsky P L. Size of outbreaks near the epidemic threshold. Physical Review E, 2004, 69: 050901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao Z, Sang J, Zou X, et al. Blackmail propagation on small-world networks. Physica A, 2005, 351: 662–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman M E J. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Physical Review E, 2002, 66: 016128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Liu Z, Ma W. Epidemic propagation and microscopic structure of complex networks. Chinese Physics Letters, 2006, 23: 1050–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eguiluz V M, Klemm K. Epidemic threshold in structured scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters, 2002, 89: 108701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Z, Hu B. Epidemic spreading in community networks. Europhysics Letters, 2005, 72: 315–321

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Serrano M A, Boguna M. Percolation and epidemic thresholds in clustered networks. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 97: 088701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gross T, Dommar D’Lima C J, Blasius B. Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96: 208701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Liu Z. Epidemic spreading in complex networks. Frontiers of Physics in China, 2008, 3: 331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou J, Liu Z, Li B. Influence of network structure on rumor propagation. Physics Letters A, 2007, 368: 458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Y, Liu Z, Zhou J. Periodic wave of epidemic spreading in community networks. Chinese Physics Letters, 2007, 24: 581–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou J, Liu Z. Epidemic spreading in communities with mobile agents. Physica A, 2009, 388: 1228–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang M, Liu L, Liu Z. Influence of dynamical condensation on epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review E, 2009, 79: 016108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson R M, May R M. Infections Diseases in Humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pandit S A, Amritkar R E. Random spread on the family of smallworld networks. Physical Review E, 2001, 63: 041104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adamic L A, Lukose R M, Puniyani A R, et al. Search in power-law networks. Physical Review E, 2001, 64: 046135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Noh J D, Rieger H. Random walks on complex networks. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92: 118701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parris P E, Kenkre V M. Traversal times for random walks on smallworld networks. Physical Review E, 2005, 72: 056119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watts D J. SmallWorlds: the Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yan G, Zhou T, Hu B, et al. Efficient routing on complex networks. Physical Review E, 2006, 73: 046108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X G, Lai Y C, Lai C H. Oscillations of complex networks. Physical Review E, 2006, 74: 066104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Z, Ma W, Zhang H, et al. An efficient approach of controlling traffic congestion in scale-free networks. Physica A, 2006, 370: 843–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang H, Liu Z, Tang M, et al. An adaptive routing strategy for packet delivery in complex networks. Physics Letters A, 2007, 364: 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature, 1998, 393: 440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Holme P, Kim B J. Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Physical Review E, 2002, 65: 026107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu X, Liu Z. How community structure influences epidemic spread in social networks. Physica A, 2008, 387: 623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Newman M E J. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 2002, 89: 208701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Catanzaro M, Boguna M, Pastor-Satorras R. Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. Physical Review E, 2005, 71: 027103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang M, Liu Z, Zhou J. Condensation in a zero range process on weighted scale-free networks. Physical Review E, 2006, 74: 036101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Newman M E J. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 2001, 64: 025102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zonghua Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Wu, X. & Hui, PM. An alternative approach to characterize the topology of complex networks and its application in epidemic spreading. Front. Comput. Sci. China 3, 324–334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0058-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-009-0058-7

Keywords