Skip to main content
Log in

A three-way incremental-learning algorithm for radar emitter identification

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radar emitter identification has been recognized as an indispensable task for electronic intelligence system. With the increasingly accumulated radar emitter intelligence and information, one key issue is to rebuild the radar emitter classifier efficiently with the newly-arrived information. Although existing incremental learning algorithms are superior in saving significant computational cost by incremental learning on continuously increasing training samples, they are not adaptable enough yet when emitter types, features and samples are increasing dramatically. For instance, the intra-pulse characters of emitter signals could be further extracted and thus expand the feature dimension. The same goes for the radar emitter type dimension when samples from new radar emitter types are gathered. In addition, existing incremental classifiers are still problematic in terms of computational cost, sensitivity to data input order, and difficulty in multiemitter type identification. To address the above problems, we bring forward a three-way incremental learning algorithm (TILA) for radar emitter identification which is adaptable for the increase in emitter features, types and samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou Z H, Chen Z Q. Hybrid decision tree. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2002, 15(8): 515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Domingos P, Hulten G. A general framework for mining massive data streams. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2003, 12(14): 945–949

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Masud M M, Chen Q, Khan L, Aggarwal C C, Gao J, Han J, Srivastava A, Oza N C. Classification and adaptive novel class detection of feature-evolving data streams. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013, 25(7): 1484–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bordes A, Bottou L. The huller: a simple and efficient online SVM. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3720: 505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barak O, Rigotti M. A simple derivation of a bound on the rerceptron margin using singular value decomposition. Neural Computation, 2011, 23(8): 1935–1943

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang T. Solving large scale linear prediction problems using stochastic gradient descent algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conferenc on Machine Learning. 2004, 919–926

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shalev-Shwartz S, Singer Y, Srebro N, Cotter A. Pegasos: primal estimated sub-gradient solver for SVM. Mathematical Programming, 2011, 127(1): 3–30

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Long P M. The relaxed online maximum margin algorithm. Machine Learning, 2002, 46: 1–3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulten G, Spencer L, Domingos P. Mining time-changing data streams. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2001, 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carpenter G A, Grossberg S, Markuzon N, Reynolds J H, Rosen D B. Fuzzy ARTMAP: a neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning of analog multidimensional maps. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1991, 3(5): 698–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Polikar R, Udpa L, Udpa S S, Honavar V. Learn++: an incremental learning algorithm for supervised neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2001, 31(4): 497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheng W, Banta L E. Parameter incremental learning algorithm for neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2006, 17(6): 1424–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katakis I, Tsoumakas G, Vlahavas I. Dynamic feature space and incremental feature selection for the classification of textual data streams. Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, 2006: 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wenerstrom B, Giraud-Carrier C. Temporal data mining in dynamic feature spaces. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2006, 1141–1145

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masud M M, Gao J, Khan L, Han J, Thuraisingham B. Integrating novel class detection with classification for concept-drifting data streams. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, 5782: 79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masud M M, Chen Q, Jing G, Latifur K, Jiawei H, Bhavani T. Classification and novel class detection of data streams in a dynamic feature space. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2010, 6322: 337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spinosa E J, de Leon F, de Carvalho A P, Gama J. Cluster-based novel concept detection in data streams applied to intrusion detection in computer networks. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 2008: 976–980

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sminu N R, Jemimah S. Feature based data stream classification (FBDC) and novel class detection. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 2014, 25(7): 28–32

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu B, Jin d W. Radar emitter signal recognition based on EMD and neural network. Journal of Computers, 2012, 7(6): 1413–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Z, Wu Z, Yin Z, Quan T, Sun H. Hybrid radar emitter recognition based on rough k-means classifier and relevance vector machine. Sensors, 2013, 13(1): 848–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu H J, Liu Z, Jiang W L, Zhou Y Y. Incremental learning approach based on vector neural network for emitter identification. IET Signal Processing, 2010, 4(1): 45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kauppia J P, Martikainenb K, Ruotsalainena U. Hierarchical classifica tion of dynamically varying radar pulse repetition interval modulation patterns. Neural Networks, 2010, 23(10): 1226–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu X, Wang W. An incremental gray relational analysis algorithm for multiclass classification and outlier detection. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 26(6): 1250011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Montazer G A, Khoshniat H, Fathi V. Improvement of RBF neural networks using Fuzzy-OSD algorithm in an online radar pulse classification system. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(9): 3831–3838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang K, LinM, Minku F L, Yao X. Selective negative correlation learning approach to incremental learning. Neurocomputing, 2009, 72(13–15): 2796–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sudo A, Sato A, Hasegawa O. Associative memory for online learning in noisy environments using self-organizing incremental neural network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2009, 20(6): 964–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chao S, Wong F. An incremental decision tree learning methodology regarding attributes in medical data mining. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 2009, 3: 1694–1699

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bottou L. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Procceedings of OMPSTAT. 2010, 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bottou L, Bousquet O. The tradeoffs of large scale learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008, 20: 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sculley D. Combined regression and ranking. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD Conference. 2010, 979–988

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu X, Yu K, Ding W, Wang H, Zhu X. Online feature selection with streaming features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2013, 35(5): 1178–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ditzler G, Rosen G, Polikar R. Incremental learning of new classes from unbalanced data. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). 2013, 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  33. Filzmoser P. A multivariate outlier detection method. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Data Analysis and Modeling. 2004, 18–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Xu.

Additional information

Xin Xu received her PhD in School of Computing from National University of Singapore, Singapore in 2006. She is currently a Senior Research Engineer in Science and Technology on Information System Engineering Laboratory, China. Her research interests are in the area of data mining and data fusion.

Wei Wang received his PhD in electrical and computer engineering from National University of Singapore, Singapore in 2008. He is currently an associated professor in Department of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University, China. His research interests are in the area of wireless sensor networks and data fusion.

Jianhong Wang received his PhD in College of Automation Engineer from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China. He is currently an associate professor in Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, China. His research interests include realtime distributed control, optimization and system identification.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Wang, W. & Wang, J. A three-way incremental-learning algorithm for radar emitter identification. Front. Comput. Sci. 10, 673–688 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-015-4457-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-015-4457-7

Keywords

Navigation