Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal bundles for sponsored search auctions via bracketing scheme

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sponsored search auction has been recently studied and auctioneer’s revenue is an important consideration in probabilistic single-item second-price auctions. Some papers have analyzed the revenue maximization problem on different methods to bundle contexts. In this paper, we propose a more flexible and natural method which is called the bracketing method.We prove that finding a bracketing scheme that maximizes the auctioneer’s revenue is strongly NP-hard. Then, a heuristic algorithm is given. Experiments on three test cases show that the revenue of the optimal bracketing scheme is very close to the optimal revenue without any bundling constraint, and the heuristic algorithm performs very well. Finally, we consider a simpler model that for each row in the valuation matrix, the non-zero cells have the same value. We prove that the revenue maximization problem with K-anonymous signaling scheme and cardinality constrained signaling scheme in this simpler model are both NP-hard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Interactive Advertising Bureau. Iab Internet advertising revenue report 2013 full year results. Technical Report, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fain D C, Pedersen J O. Sponsored search: a brief history. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 32(2): 12–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen B J, Mullen T. Sponsored search: an overview of the concept, history, and technology. International Journal of Electronic Business, 2008, 6(2): 114–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin T, Chen W, Liu T Y. Sponsored search auctions: recent advances and future directions. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2015, 5(4): 60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Even-Dar E, Kearns M, Wortman J. Sponsored search with contexts. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. 2007, 312–317

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh A, Nazerzadeh H, Sundararajan M. Computing optimal bundles for sponsored search. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. 2007, 576–583

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Emek Y, Feldman M, Gamzu I, Tennenholtz M. Revenue maximization in probabilistic single-item auctions via signaling. In: Proceedings of the 7th Ad Auctions Workshop. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miltersen B, Sheffet O. Send mixed signals: earn more, work less. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 2012, 234–247

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dughmi S, Immorlica N, Roth A. Constrained signaling for welfare and revenue maximization. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 2013, 12(1): 53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dughmi S, Immorlica N, Roth A. Constrained signaling in auction design. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 2014, 1341–1357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dughmi S. On the hardness of signaling. 2014, arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.4194

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen C, Qin T. k-anonymous signaling scheme. 2013, arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.6638

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo M Y, Deligkas A. Revenue maximization via hiding item attributes. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Papadimitriou P, Garcia-Molina H, Dasdan A, Kolay S. Output url bidding. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 2010, 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dasdan A, Santanu K, Papadimitriou P, Garcia-Molina H. Output bidding: a new search advertising model complementary to keyword bidding. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Ad Auctions. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garey M R, Johnson D S. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. San Francisco: Freeman. 1979

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Leyton-Brown K, Pearson M, Shoham Y. Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 2000, 66–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their many insightful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61672012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-Ming Bu.

Additional information

Zheng-Dong Xia received the Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in software engineering from East China Normal University, China in 2013 and 2016, respectively. His research interests include algorithm and auction theory. Now he is a developer in Tencent.

Tian-Ming Bu received the PhD degree from Fudan University, China in 1996. He is an associate professor of East China Normal University, China. His research interests include combinatorial algorithm design and algorithmic game theory.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, ZD., Bu, TM. & Gong, WH. Optimal bundles for sponsored search auctions via bracketing scheme. Front. Comput. Sci. 13, 333–342 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6102-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6102-0

Keywords

Navigation