Skip to main content
Log in

A survey on one-bit compressed sensing: theory and applications

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past few decades, with the growing popularity of compressed sensing (CS) in the signal processing field, the quantization step in CS has received significant attention. Current research generally considers multi-bit quantization. For systems employing quantization with a sufficient number of bits, a sparse signal can be reliably recovered using various CS reconstruction algorithms.

Recently, many researchers have begun studying the one-bit quantization case for CS. As an extreme case of CS, one-bit CS preserves only the sign information of measurements, which reduces storage costs and hardware complexity. By treating one-bit measurements as sign constraints, it has been shown that sparse signals can be recovered using certain reconstruction algorithms with a high probability. Based on the merits of one-bit CS, it has been widely applied to many fields, such as radar, source location, spectrum sensing, and wireless sensing network.

In this paper, the characteristics of one-bit CS and related works are reviewed. First, the framework of one-bit CS is introduced. Next, we summarize existing reconstruction algorithms. Additionally, some extensions and practical applications of one-bit CS are categorized and discussed. Finally, our conclusions and the further research topics are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transanctions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lexa M A, Davies M E, Thompson J S. Reconciling compressive sampling systems for spectrally sparse continuous-time signals. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(1): 155–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu W B, Li Z L, Tian Y, Wang Y, Lin J R. Perturbation analysis of simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit. Signal Processing, 2015, 116(C): 91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao K, Batalama S N, Pados D A, Suter B W. Compressive sampling with generalized polygons. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(10): 4759–4766

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Laska J N, Baraniuk R G. Regime change: bit-depth versus measurement-rate in compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(7): 3496–3505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacques L, Laska J N, Boufounos P T, Baraniuk R G. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing via binary stable embeddings of sparse vectors. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2011, 59(4): 2082–2102

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Baraniuk R, Foucart S, Needell D, Plan Y, Wootters M. Exponential decay of reconstruction error from binary measurements of sparse signals. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1407.8246, 2014

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Knudson K, Saab R, Ward R. One-bit compressive sensing with norm estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2014, 62(5): 2748–2758

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Plan Y, Vershynin R. Robust 1-bit compressed sensing and sparse logistic regression: a convex programming approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2013, 59(1): 482–494

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ai A, Lapanowski A, Plan Y, Vershynin R. One-bit compressed sensing with non-gaussian measurements. Linear Algebra & Its Applications, 2014, 441(1): 222–239

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang J, Shen Y, Li H. One-bit quantization design and adaptive methods for compressed sensing. Mathematics, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boufounos P T, Baraniuk R G. 1-bit compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 2008, 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hale E T, Yin W, Zhang Y. A fixed-point continuation method for l1-regularized minimization with applications to compressed sensing. CAAM Technical Report TR07-07. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laska J N, Wen Z, Yin W, Baraniuk R G. Trust, but verify: fast and accurate signal recovery from 1-bit compressive measurements. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(11): 5289–5301

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Boufounos P T. Greedy sparse signal reconstruction from sign measurements. In: Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 43rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 2009, 1305–1309

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan M, Yang Y, Osher S. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing using adaptive outlier pursuit. IEEE Transanctions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(7): 3868–3875

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Movahed A, Panahi A, Durisi G. A robust rfpi-based 1-bit compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Information Theory Workshop. 2012, 567–571

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Z, Xie L, Zhang C. Variational bayesian algorithm for quantized compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(11): 2815–2824

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Li FW, Fang J, Li H B, Huang L. Robust one-bit bayesian compressed sensing with sign-flip errors. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2015, 22(7): 857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou T Y, Tao D C. 1-bit hamming compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings. 2012, 1862–1866

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tian Y, Xu W B, Wang Y, Yang H W. A distributed compressed sensing scheme based on one-bit quantization. In: Proceedings of the 79th Vehicular Technology Conference. 2014, 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong J P, Tang Q H, Zhao J. 1-bit compressive data gathering for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2014, 2014(7): 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shen Y N, Fang J, Li H B. One-bit compressive sensing and source location is wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing. 2013, 379–383

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feng C, Valaee S, Tan Z H. Multiple target localization using compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. 2009, 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen C H, Wu J Y. Amplitude-aided 1-bit compressive sensing over noisy wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2015, 4(5): 473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meng J, Li H S, Han Z. Sparse event detection in wireless sensor neworks using compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 2009, 181–185

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sakdejayont T, Lee D, Peng Y, Yamashita Y, Morikawa H. Evaluation of memory-efficient 1-bit compressed sensing in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Hummanitarian Technologhy Conference. 2013, 326–329

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee D, Sasaki T, Yamada T, Akabane K, Yamaguchi Y, Uehara K. Spectrum sensing for networked system using 1-bit compressed sensing with partial random circulant measurement matrices. In: Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference. 2012, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fu N, Yang L, Zhang J C. Sub-nyquist 1 bit sampling system for sparse multiband signals. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Signal Processing Conference. 2014, 736–740

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alberti G, Franceschetti G, Schirinzi G, Pascazio V. Time-domain convolution of one-bit coded radar signals. IEE Proceedings F- Radar and Signal Processing, 1991, 138(5): 438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Franceschetti G, Merolla S, Tesauro M. Phase quantized sar signal processing: Theory and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1999, 35(1): 201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong X, Zhang Y H. A map approach for 1-bit compressive sensing in synthetic aperture radar imaging. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(6): 1237–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Allstot E G, Chen A Y, Dixon A M R, Gangopadhyay D, Mitsuda H, Allstot D J. Compressed sensing of ECG bio-signals using one-bit measurement matrices. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International New Circuits and Systems Conference. 2011, 213–216

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haboba J, Mangia M, Rovatti R, Setti G. An architecture for 1-bit localized compressive sensing with applications to eeg. In: Proceedings of IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. 2011, 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  35. Candes E J. The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2008, 346(9–10): 589–592

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wright S J, Nowak R D, Figueiredo M A T. Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2009, 57(7): 2479–2493

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaasschieter E F. Preconditioned conjugate gradients for solving singular systems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 1988, 24(1–2): 265–275

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Blumensath T, Davies M E. Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing. Applied and computational harmonic analysis, 2009, 27(3): 265–274

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Pati Y C, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad P S. Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 1993, 40–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Needell D, Vershynin R. Uniform uncertainty principle and signal recovery via regularized orthogonal matching pursuit. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2009, 9(3): 317–334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Needell D, Tropp J A. Cosamp: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 26(3): 301–321

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Do T T, Lu G, Nguyen N, Tran T D. Sparsity adaptive matching pursuit algorithm for practical compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 2008, 581–587

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ji S H, Xue Y, Carin L. Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(6): 2346–2356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen S S, Donoho D L, Saunders MA. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Review, 2001, 43(1): 129–159

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2011, 73(3): 273–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Candes E J, Romberg J K, Tao T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2006, 59(8): 1207–1223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Shen Y, Fang J, Li H, Chen Z. A one-bit reweighted iterative algorithm for sparse signal recovery. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2013, 5915–5919

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang L J, Yi J F, Jin R. Efficient algorithms for robust one-bit compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning. 2014, 820–828

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang H, Wan Q. One bit support recovery. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing. 2010, 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  50. Plan Y, Vershynin R. One-bit compressed sensing by linear programming. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2013, 66(8): 1275–1297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. North P, Needell D. One-bit compressive sensing with partial support. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing. 2015, 349–352

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fu X, Han F M, Zou H X. Robust 1-bit compressive sensing against sign flips. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference. 2014, 3121–3125

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zayyani H, Korki M, Marvasti F. Dictionary learning for blind one bit compressed sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2016, 23(2): 187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang X L, Shi L, Yan M, Suykens J A K. Pinball loss minimization for one-bit compressive sensing. Mathematics, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yan M. Restoration of images corrupted by impulse noise and mixed gaussian impulse noise using blind inpainting. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2013, 6(3): 1227–1245

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Tipping M. Sparse bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2001, 1(3): 211–244

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen S, Banerjee A. One-bit compressed sensing with the k-support norm. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2015, 138–146

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou T Y, Tao D C. k-bit hamming compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. 2013, 679–683

    Google Scholar 

  59. Baron D, Wakin M B, Duarte M F, Sarvotham S, Baraniuk R G. Distributed compressed sensing. Preprint, 2012, 22(10): 2729–2732

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yin H P, Li J X, Chai Y, Yang S X. A survey on distributed compressed sensing theory and applications. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2014, 8(6): 893–904

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Tian Y, Xu W B, Wang Y, Yang H W. Joint reconstruction algorithms for one-bit distributed compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Telecommunications. 2015, 338–342

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nakarmi U, Rahnavard N. Joint wideband spectrum sensing in frequency overlapping cognitive radio networks using distributed compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of the Military Communications Conference. 2011, 1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  63. Li Z L, Xu WB, Wang Y, Lin J R. A tree-based regularized orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Telecommunications. 2015, 343–347

    Google Scholar 

  64. He L H, Carin L. Exploiting structure in wavelet-based bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2009, 57(9): 3488–3497

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Allstot E G, Chen A Y, Dixon A M R, Gangopadhyay D. Compressive sampling of ecg bio-signals: quantization noise and sparsity considerations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. 2010, 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  66. Haboba J, Rovatti R, Setti G. Rads converter: an approach to analog to information conversion. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems. 2012, 49–52

    Google Scholar 

  67. Movahed A, Reed M C. Iterative detection for compressive sensing: Turbo cs. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications. 2014, 4518–4523

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yamada T, Lee D, Toshinaga H, Akabane K, Yamaguchi Y, Uehara K. 1-bit compressed sensing with edge detection for compressed radio wave data transfer. In: Proceedings of the 18th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications. 2012, 407–411

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mo J, Schniter P, Prelcic N G, Heath R W. Channel estimation in millimeter wave mimo systems with one-bit quantization. In: Proceedings of the 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 2014, 957–961

    Google Scholar 

  70. Luo C. A low power self-capacitive touch sensing analog front end with sparse multi-touch detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2014, 3007–3011

    Google Scholar 

  71. Chen H, Shao H. Sparse recovery-based doa estimator with signaldependent dictionary. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems. 2014, 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gupta A, Nowak R, Recht B. Sample complexity for 1-bit compressed sensing and sparse classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings. 2010, 1553–1557

    Google Scholar 

  73. Candes E, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Rauhut H. Circulant and toeplitz matrices in compressed sensing. Mathematics, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  75. Candes E J, Wakin M B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magzine, 2008, 25(2): 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Candes E, Tao T. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005, 51(12): 4203–4215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Scarlett J, Evans J S, Dey S. Compressed sensing with prior information: information-theoretic limits and practical decoders. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(2): 427–439

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Eldar Y C, Kuppinger P, Bolcskei H. Compressed sensing of blocksparse signals: uncertainty relations and efficient recovery. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(6): 3042–3054

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Yu X H, Baek S J. Sufficient conditions on stable recovery of sparse signals with partial support information. IEEE Signal Processing letters, 2013, 20(5): 539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Friedlander M P, Mansour H, Saab R, Yilmaz O. Recovering compressively sampled signals using partial support information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 58(2): 1122–1134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Miosso C J, Borries R V, Pierluissi J H. Compressive sensing with prior information: requirements and probabilities of reconstruction in l1- minimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(9): 2150–2164

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Davenport M A, Wakin M B. Analysis of orthogonal matching pursuit using the restricted isometry property. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010, 56(9): 4395–4401

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Liu E, Temlyakov V N. The orthogonal super greedy algorithm and applications in compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 58(4): 2040–2047

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Ding J, Chen L M, Gu Y T. Perturbation analysis of orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(2): 398–410

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Mo Q, Shen Y. A remark on the restricted isometry property in orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Infirmation Theroy, 2012, 58(6): 3654–3656

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Maleh R. Improved RIP analysis of orthogonal matching pursuit. Computer Science, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dai W, Milenkovic O. Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing: Closing the gap between performance and complexity. IEEE Transactions on Infirmation Theroy, 2008, 55(5): 2230–2249

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61302084).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhilin Li.

Additional information

Zhilin Li received the BE degree in communication engineering from the Minzu University of China, China in 2011. He is currently pursuing the PhD degree in the School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China. His current research interests include signal processing in wireless communication, compressed sensing, and machine learning.

Wenbo Xu received the BS and PhD degrees from School of Information Engineering in Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), China in 2005 and 2010, respectively. She is currently an associate professor in the School of Information and Communication Engineering in BUPT. Her research interests include signal processing in wireless networks and digital signal processing.

Xiaobo Zhang received the MS degree from School of Mathematics and Statistics, Zheng Zhou University, China in 2014. He is currently working toward the PhD degree at the School of Information Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China. His research interests include compressive sensing, combination design, measure and probability.

Jiaru Lin received the BS and PhD degrees from School of Information Engineering in Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT), China in 1987 and 2001, respectively. From 1991 to 1994, he studied in Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland. He is now a professor and PhD supervisor in the School of Information and Communication Engineering, BUPT. His research interests include wireless communication, personal communication and communication networks.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, X. et al. A survey on one-bit compressed sensing: theory and applications. Front. Comput. Sci. 12, 217–230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6132-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6132-7

Keywords