Skip to main content
Log in

Cursor momentum for fascination measurement

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a very different cause of search engine user behaviors—fascination. It is generally identified as the initial effect of a product attribute on users’ interest and purchase intentions. Considering the fact that in most cases the cursor is driven directly by a hand to move via a mouse (or touchpad), we use the cursor movement as the critical feature to analyze the personal reaction against the fascinating search results. This paper provides a deep insight into the goal-directed cursor movement that occurs within a remarkably short period of time (<30 milliseconds), which is the interval between a user’s click-through and decision-making behaviors. Instead of the fundamentals, we focus on revealing the characteristics of the split-second cursor movement. Our empirical findings showed that a user may push or pull the mouse with a slightly greater strength when fascinated by a search result. As a result, the cursor slides toward the search result with an increased momentum. We model the momentum through a combination of translational and angular kinetic energy calculations. Based on Fitts’ law, we implement goal-directed cursor movement identification. Supported by the momentum, together with other physical features, we built different fascination-based search result reranking systems. Our experiments showed that goal-directed cursor momentum is an effective feature in detecting fascination. In particular, they show feasibility in both the personalized and cross-media cases. In addition, we detail the advantages and disadvantages of both click-through rate and cursor momentum for re-ranking search results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahle L R, Homer P M. Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: a social adaptation perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 1985, 11(4): 954–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitts P M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 47(6): 381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brehm J W, Cohen A R. Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bem D J. Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74(3): 183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly A H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended Thought, 1989, 212–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bockenholt U, Albert D, Aschenbrenner M, Schmalhofer F. The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute difference on information acquisition in multi attribute binary choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 49(2): 258–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fehr N V D, Stevik K. Persuasive advertising and product differentiation. Southern Economic Journal, 1998, 65(1): 113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saari T, Ravaja N, Laarni J, Turpeinen M, Kallinen K. Psychologically targeted persuasive advertising and product information in Ecommerce. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce. 2004, 245–254

    Google Scholar 

  9. Azimi J, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Navalpakkam V, Mao J, Feng X. Visual appearance of display Ads and its effect on click through rate. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2012, 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hong Y, Lu J, Yao J M, Zhu Q M, Zhou G D. What reviews are satisfactory: novel feature for automatic helpfulness voting. In: Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2012, 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu W, Manavoglu E, Cantu-Paz E. Temporal click model for sponsored search. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2010, 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ceppi S, Gatti N, Gerding E H. Mechanism design for federated sponsored search auctions. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2011, 608–613

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jansen B J, Moore K, Carman S. Evaluating the performance of demographic targeting using gender in sponsored search. Information Processing & Management, 2013, 49(1): 286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma H, Lyu MR, King I. Diversifying query suggestion results. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2010, 1399–1404

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang Q, Sun M. Fast query recommendation by search. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2011, 1192–1197

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Y, Yan TW. Position-normalized click prediction in search advertising. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2012, 795–803

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao B, Yan J, Shen D, Liu T Y. Internet advertising: theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2013, 1135–1135

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alipov V, Topinsky V, Trofimov L. On peculiarities of positional effects in sponsored search. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2014, 1015–1018

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Q, Agichtein E. Ready to buy or just browsing? Detecting Web searcher goals from interaction data. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2010, 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  20. González-Caro C, Marcos M C. Different users and intents: an eyetracking analysis of Web search. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2011, 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buscher G, Dengel A, Biedert R, Elst L V. Attentive documents: eye tracking as implicit feedback for information retrieval and beyond. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2012, 1(2): 9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toker D, Conati C, Steichen B, Carenini G. Individual user characteristics and information visualization: connecting the dots through eye tracking. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013, 295–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G, Zhang X, Tang S, Zheng H, Zhao B Y. Unsupervised clickstream clustering for user behavior analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2016, 225–236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Borisov A, Markov I, de Rijke M, Serdyukov P. A Context-aware Time Model for Web Search. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2016, 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu Y, Liu Y, Su N, Ma S P, Ou W W. Predicting online shop-ping search satisfaction and user behaviors with electrodermal activity. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 2017, 855–856

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Navalpakkam V, Churchill E F. Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users’ experience of Web-based content. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2012, 2963–2972

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huang J, White R W, Dumais S. No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011, 1225–1234

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang J, White R W, Buscher G. User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in Web search. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2012, 1341–1350

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gan K, Hoffman E R. Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. Ergonomics, 1988, 31(5): 829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Accot J, Zhai S. Beyond Fitts’ law: models for trajectory based HCI tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1997, 295–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Udwadia F, Kalaba R. Analytical Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Vapnik V, Golowich S E, Smola A. Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1997, 281–287

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cao Y, Xu J, Liu T, Li H, Huang Y, Hon H. Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 29th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2006, 186–193

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quattoni A, Wang S, Morency L P, Collins M, Darrell M. Hidden conditional random fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29(10)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gao B, Yan J, Shen D, Liu T. Internet advertising: theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2013, 1135–1135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61672368, 61373097, and 61672367), the Research Foundation of the Ministry of Education and China Mobile (MCM20150602) and the Science and Technology Plan of Jiangsu (BK20151222). The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Hong.

Additional information

Yu Hong is an associate professor in Soochow University, China. His main research interests focuses on personal information retrieval, topic detection and tracking, discourse analysis and event extraction.

Kai Wang is an MS candidate at Soochow University, China. Her research interests include natural language processing, information extraction and information retrieval.

Weiyi Ge achieved a PhD degree in Southeast University, China. Now he serves in the Science and Technology on Information Systems Engineering Lab, CETC28. His research interests include natural language processing and big data processing.

Yingying Qiu is an MS candidate at Soochow University, China. Her research interests include natural language processing and information extraction.

Guodong Zhou is a PhD supervisor, and a professor in Soochow University, China. His main research interests focuses on natural language understanding, information extraction, statistical machine translation, machine learning.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, Y., Wang, K., Ge, W. et al. Cursor momentum for fascination measurement. Front. Comput. Sci. 13, 396–412 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6607-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6607-6

Keywords

Navigation