Abstract
Blockchain(BC), as an emerging distributed database technology with advanced security and reliability, has attracted much attention from experts who devoted to e-finance, intellectual property protection, the Internet of Things (IoT) and so forth. However, the inefficient transaction processing speed, which hinders the BC’s widespread, has not been well tackled yet. In this paper, we propose a novel architecture, called Dual-Channel Parallel Broadcast model (DCPB), which could address such a problem to a greater extent by using three methods which are dual communication channels, parallel pipeline processing and block broadcast strategy. In the dual-channel model, one channel processes transactions, and the other engages in the execution of BFT. The parallel pipeline processing allows the system to operate asynchronously. The block generation strategy improves the efficiency and speed of processing. Extensive experiments have been applied to BeihangChain, a simplified prototype for BC system, illustrates that its transaction processing speed could be improved to 16K transaction per second which could well support many real-world scenarios such as BC-based energy trading system and Micro-film copyright trading system in CCTV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garay J, Kiayias A, Leonardos N. The bitcoin backbone protocol: analysis and applications. In: Proceedings of Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. 2015, 281–310
Florian T, Björn S. Bitcoin and beyond: a technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2016, 18(3): 2084–2123
Tsai W T, Blower R, Zhu Y. A system view of financial blockchains. In: Proceedings of IEEE Service-Oriented System Engineering. 2016, 450–457
Tsai W T, Feng L B, Zhang H. Intellectual-property blockchain-based protection model for microfilms. In: Proceedings of IEEE Service-Oriented System Engineering. 2017, 174–178
Danezis G, Meiklejohn S. Centrally banked cryptocurrencies. In: Proceedings of ISOC Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. 2016, 1–14
Coeckelbergh M, Reijers W. Cryptocurrencies as narrative technologies. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society. 2015, 172–178
Koshy P, Koshy D, McDaniel P. An analysis of anonymity in bitcoin using P2P network traffic. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2014, 469–483
Preneel B. Cryptographic hash functions. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 1994, 5(4): 431–448
Sasson E B, Chiesa A, Garman C. Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from bitcoin. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. 2014, 459–474
Hoang G D,Wee K N. Blockchain-based system for secure data storage with private keyword search. In: Proceedings of IEEEWorld Congress on Services. 2017, 90–93
Decker C, Seidel J, Wattenhofer R. Bitcoin meets strong consistency. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. 2016, 13–21
Kraft D. Difficulty control for blockchain-based consensus systems. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2016, 9(2): 397–413
Maurer A, Tixeuil S. Self-stabilizing byzantine broadcast. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems. 2014, 152–160
Ziegeldorf J H, Henrik J, Grossmann F. Coinparty: secure multi-party mixing of bitcoins. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. 2015, 75–86
Hooff V, Kaashoek M, Zeldovich N. Versum: verifiable computations over large public logs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACMSIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2014, 1304–1316
Lewenberg Y, Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Inclusive blockchain protocols. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2015, 528–547
Buterin V. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper, 2014, 1–36
Sarr I, Naacke H, Gueye I. Blockchain-based Model for Social Transactions Processing. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Data Management Technologies and Applications. 2015, 309–315
Lemieux V L. Trusting records: is blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal, 2016, 26(2): 110–139
Ali S T, McCorry P, Lee P H J, Feng H. Zombiecoin: powering nextgeneration botnets with bitcoin. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2015, 34–48
Zhang Y, Wen J T. An IoT electric business model based on the protocol of bitcoin. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks. 2015, 184–191
Herrera-Joancomartí J, Pérez-Solà C. Privacy in bitcoin transactions: new challenges from blockchain scalability solutions. In: Proceedings of Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. 2016, 26–44
Pass R, Seeman L, Shelat A. Analysis of the blockchain protocol in asynchronous networks. In: Proceedings of Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. 2016, 643–673
Pazmiño J E, Rodrigues C K S. Simply dividing a bitcoin network node may reduce transaction verification time. The SIJ Transactions on Computer Networks & Communication Engineering, 2015, 3(2): 17–21
Ron D, Shamir A. Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2013, 6–24
Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Secure high-rate transaction processing in bitcoin. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2015, 507–527
Eyal I, Gencer A E, Sirer E G. Bitcoin-NG: a scalable blockchain protocol. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. 2016, 45–59
Zamani E D, Kypriotaki K N, Giaglis G M. From bitcoin to decentralized autonomous corporations extending the application scope of decentralized peer-to-peer networks and blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. 2015, 284–290
Heilman E, Baldimtsi F, Goldberg S. Blindly signed contracts: anonymous on-blockchain and off-blockchain bitcoin transactions. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 2016, 43–60
Buterin V. Notes on scalable blockchain protocols. Ethereum Foundation, 2015, 31
Vukolić M. The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: proof-of-work vs. BFT replication. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security. 2015, 112–125
Bentov I. Lee C,Mizrahi A. Proof of activity: extending bitcoin’s proof of work via proof of stake. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 2014, 42(3): 34–37
Castro M, Liskov B. Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2002, 20(4): 398–461
Lamport L, Malkhi D, Zhou L. Vertical paxos and primary-backup replication. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 2009, 312–313
Dennis R, Owen G. Rep on the block: a next generation reputation system based on the blockchain. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Internet Technology and Secured Transactions. 2015, 131–138
Herbert J, Litchfield A. A novel method for decentralized peer-to-peer software license validation using cryptocurrency blockchain technology. In: Proceedings of the 38th Australasian Computer Science Conference. 2015, 27–35
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1400200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61672075, M1450009 and 61462003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Libo Feng received his MS degree from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunication, China in 2008. He is currently a PhD candidate in the School of Computer Science, Beihang University, China since 2015, China. His research interests include big data analysis and processing, distributed systems, machine learning, and blockchain.
Hui Zhang is currently a professor at the School of Computer Science, Beihang University, China. He received his PhD degree from Beihang University in 2010. He was a visiting scholar in the Argonne National Laboratory, USA in 2007–2008. His current research interests include big data analysis and processing, distributed systems, machine learning, and blockchain.
Wei-Tek Tsai is currently a professor in the School of Computing Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering at Arizona State University, USA. He received his PhD and MS in computer science from University of California at Berkeley, and SB in computer science and engineering from MIT, USA. He focused his energy on service-oriented computing and SaaS, and worked on various aspects of software engineering including blockchain, architecture, testing, and maintenance.
Simeng Sun is currently an undergraduate in the Department of Computer Science, Beihang University, China since 2013. She is conducting her graduation project at State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment. Her research interests include distributed systems, machine learning, smart contracts, and blockchain.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, L., Zhang, H., Tsai, WT. et al. System architecture for high-performance permissioned blockchains. Front. Comput. Sci. 13, 1151–1165 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-018-6345-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-018-6345-4