Skip to main content
Log in

Monotonic and nonmonotonic gentzen deduction systems for L3-valued propositional logic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A sequent is a pair (Γ, Δ), which is true under an assignment if either some formula in Γ is false, or some formula in Δ is true. In L3-valued propositional logic, a multisequent is a triple Δ|Θ|Γ, which is true under an assignment if either some formula in Δ has truth-value t, or some formula in Θ has truth-value m, or some formula in Γ has truth-value f. Correspondingly there is a sound and complete Gentzen deduction system G for multisequents which is monotonic. Dually, a co-multisequent is a triple Δ: Θ: Γ, which is valid if there is an assignment v in which each formula in Δ has truth-value ≠ t, each formula in Θ has truth-value ≠ m, and each formula in Γ has truth-value ≠ f. Correspondingly there is a sound and complete Gentzen deduction system G for co-multisequents which is nonmonotonic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hähnle R. Advanced many-valued logics. In: Gabbay D M, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2. Springer, Netherlands, 2001, 297–395

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Malinowski G. Many-valued logic and its philosophy. In: Gabbay D M, Woods J, eds. Handbook of The History of Logic, Vol. 8, The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic. Elsevier, 2009

  3. Bochvar D A, Bergmann M. On a three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus. History and Philosophy of Logic, 1981, 2(1–2): 87–112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lukasiewicz J. Selected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobociński B. Axiomatization of a partial system of three-value calculus of propositions. The Journal of Computing Systems, 1952, 1(1): 23–55

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Avron A. Natural 3-valued logics-characterization and proof theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1991, 56(1): 276–294

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wansing H. The power of Belnap: sequent systems for SIXTEEN3. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2010, 39(4): 369–393

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Avron A. On the expressive power of three-valued and four-valued languages. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2000, 9(6): 977–994

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zach R. Proof theory of finite-valued logics, Technical Report TUW-E185.2-Z.1-93. Institut Für Computersprachen, Technische Universität Wien, 1993

  10. Gabbay D M. Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitting M C. Many-valued modal logics. Fundamenta Informaticae, 1991, 15(3): 235–254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Li W, Sui Y F. Multisequent gentzen deduction systems for B 22 -valued first-order logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2018, 7(1): 53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottwald S. A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics, Studies in Logic and Computation, Vol.9. Baldock: Research Studies Press Ltd., 2001

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1–2): 81–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginsberg M L. Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clark K. Negation as failure. In: Ginsberg M L, ed. Readings in Non-monotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1987, 311–325

  17. Takeuti G. Proof theory. In: Barwise J, ed. Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam, NL: North-Holland, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cao C, Chen B, Sui Y. The B4-valued prepositional Belnap-Dunn logic. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 28: 2705–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urquhart A. Basic many-valued logic. In: Gabbay D M, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol.2. Springer, Netherlands, 2001, 249–295

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanxi Hu.

Additional information

Cungen Cao graduated with a PhD degree from Institute of Mathematics Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. He is working at Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He is a Professor, and PhD supervisor, a member of CCF. His main research interest is large-scale knowledge process.

Lanxi Hu got the Master’s degree from University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. She is studying in Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, Engineer. Her main research interest is foundation of large-scale knowledge process.

Yuefei Sui graduated with a PhD degree from Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, working at Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. He is a Professor, and PhD supervisor, a member of CCF. His main research interests include foundation of large-scale knowledge process and mathematical logic.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, C., Hu, L. & Sui, Y. Monotonic and nonmonotonic gentzen deduction systems for L3-valued propositional logic. Front. Comput. Sci. 15, 153401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9076-2

Keywords

Navigation