Skip to main content
Log in

A quality status encoding scheme for PCB-based products in IoT-enabled remanufacturing

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a binary-extensible quality status encoding scheme, named IQSCT (IoT quality status code table), is proposed for the PCB-based product with available recovery options in remanufacturing. IQSCT is achieved by code evolution based on binary logic, in which the product flow and the quality information flow are integrated, and three key features of PCB-based product (PCB-module association, assembly-disassembly logic, and disassembly risk) are involved in production costing. With IQSCT, the manufacturer can have better decisions to reduce remanufacturing cost and improve resource utilization, which is verified by a case study based on the real data from BOM cost and corresponding estimation of Apple iPhone 11 series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jia D, Li S. Optimal decisions and distribution channel choice of closed-loop supply chain when e-retailer offers online marketplace. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 265: 121767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walle A H. Remanufacturing marketing strategy and developing countries. Journal of Global Marketing, 1988, 1(4): 75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Kucukyazici B, Verter V, Jesús Sáenz M. Supply chain design for unlocking the value of remanufacturing under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 247(3): 804–819

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Branstetter L G, Drev M, Kwon N. Get with the program: software-driven innovation in traditional manufacturing. Management Science, 2019, 65(2): 541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dweekat A J, Hwang G, Park J. A supply chain performance measurement approach using the internet of things: toward more practical SCPMS. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2017, 117(2): 267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Yang H, Li M, Huisingh D, Wang L. The ‘Internet of Things’ enabled real-time scheduling for remanufacturing of automobile engines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185: 562–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeihoonian M, Zanjani M K, Gendreau M. Accelerating Benders decomposition for closed-loop supply chain network design: case of used durable products with different quality levels. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 251(3): 830–845

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeihoonian M, Zanjani M K, Gendreau M. Closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertain quality status: case of durable products. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 470–486

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Subulan K, Taşan A S, Baykasoğlu A. A fuzzy goal programming model to strategic planning problem of a lead/acid battery closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 37: 243–264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Subulan K, Taşan A S, Baykasoğlu A. Designing an environmentally conscious tire closed-loop supply chain network with multiple recovery options using interactive fuzzy goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(9): 2661–2702

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang C, Liu X, Pei J, Fan W, Pardalos P M. Optimal production planning in a hybrid manufacturing and recovering system based on the internet of things with closed loop supply chains. Operational Research, 2015, 16(3): 543–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Govindan K, Jha P C, Garg K. Product recovery optimization in closed-loop supply chain to improve sustainability in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 54(5): 1463–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gu F, Ma B, Guo J, Summers P A, Hall P. Internet of things and Big Data as potential solutions to the problems in waste electrical and electronic equipment management: an exploratory study. Waste Management, 2017, 68: 434–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y T, Chan F T S, Chung S H. An integrated closed-loop supply chain model with location allocation problem and product recycling decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 53(10): 3120–3140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowshannahad M, Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Cassini B. Multi-item bilevel supply chain planning with multiple remanufacturing of reusable by-products. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 198: 25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Safaei A S, Roozbeh A, Paydar M M. A robust optimization model for the design of a cardboard closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166: 1154–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doolun I S, Ponnambalam S G, Subramanian N, Kanagaraj G. Data driven hybrid evolutionary analytical approach for multi objective location allocation decisions: automotive green supply chain empirical evidence. Computers & Operations Research, 2018, 98: 265–283

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shankar R, Bhattacharyya S, Choudhary A. A decision model for a strategic closed-loop supply chain to reclaim End-of-Life Vehicles. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 195: 273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Radhi M, Zhang G. Optimal configuration of remanufacturing supply network with return quality decision. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 54(5): 1487–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baptista S, Barbosa-Póvoa A P, Escudero L F, Gomes M I, Pizarro C. On risk management of a two-stage stochastic mixed 0–1 model for the closed-loop supply chain design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 274(1): 91–107

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Guiras Z, Turki S, Rezg N, Dolgui A. Optimization of two-level disassembly/remanufacturing/assembly system with an integrated maintenance strategy. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(5): 666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kazancoglu Y, Ozkan-Ozen Y D. Sustainable disassembly line balancing model based on triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(14): 4246–4266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Masoudipour E, Amirian H, Sahraeian R. A novel closed-loop supply chain based on the quality of returned products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 151: 344–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niknejad A, Petrovic D. Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 238(1): 143–154

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ondemir O, Gupta S M. Quality management in product recovery using the Internet of Things: an optimization approach. Computers in Industry, 2014, 65(3): 491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Salem M, Diabat A, Dalalah D, Alrefaei M. A closed-loop supply chain management problem: reformulation and piecewise linearization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 40: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu H, Solvang W D. Incorporating flexible capacity in the planning of a multi-product multi-echelon sustainable reverse logistics network under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 198: 285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Douzis K, Sotiriadis S, Petrakis E G M, Amza C. Modular and generic IoT management on the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 78: 369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Büyüközkan G, Göcer F. Digital supply chain: literature review and a proposed framework for future research. Computers in Industry, 2018, 97: 157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Basset M, Manogaran G, Mai M. Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain: a framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 86: 614–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Byun J, Woo S, Tolcha Y, Kim D. Oliot EPCIS: engineering a web information system complying with EPC Information Services standard towards the Internet of Things. Computers in Industry, 2018, 94: 82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Främling K, Maharjan M. Standardized communication between intelligent products for the IoT. International Federation of Automatic Control Proceedings Volumes. 2013, 46(7): 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu Y, Han W, Zhang Y, Li L, Wang J, Zheng L. An Internet-of-Things solution for food safety and quality control: a pilot project in China. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2016, 3: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kshetri N. 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 39: 80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Han Y, Wen J. SMER: a secure method of exchanging resources in heterogeneous internet of things. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2019, 13(6): 1198–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous associate editor, and three referees for their constructive comments that helped improve the paper This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871058 and 71531010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sijie Li.

Additional information

Sijie Li received his PhD in 2006 from the Management School of USTC, China. He is an associate professor at Southeast University, China. His research interests include supply chain management, quality management and IoT.

You Shang is a PhD candidate in the School of Economics and Management at Southeast University, China. His research interests include remanufacturing optimization for mass production, and big data analysis therein.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Shang, Y. A quality status encoding scheme for PCB-based products in IoT-enabled remanufacturing. Front. Comput. Sci. 15, 155615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9175-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9175-0

Keywords

Navigation