Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A computational model to identify fertility-related proteins using sequence information

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fertility is the most crucial step in the development process, which is controlled by many fertility-related proteins, including spermatogenesis-, oogenesis- and embryogenesis-related proteins. The identification of fertility-related proteins can provide important clues for studying the role of these proteins in development. Therefore, in this study, we constructed a two-layer classifier to identify fertility-related proteins. In this classifier, we first used the composition of amino acids (AA) and their physical and chemical properties to code these three fertility-related proteins. Then, the feature set is optimized by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and incremental feature selection (IFS) to obtain the optimal feature subset. Through five-fold cross-validation (CV) and independent data tests, the performance of models constructed by different machine learning (ML) methods is evaluated and compared. Finally, based on support vector machine (SVM), we obtained a two-layer model to classify three fertility-related proteins. On the independent test data set, the accuracy (ACC) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the first layer classifier are 81.95% and 0.89, respectively, and them of the second layer classifier are 84.74% and 0.90, respectively. These results show that the proposed model has stable performance and satisfactory prediction accuracy, and can become a powerful model to identify more fertility related proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson J, Bagley J, Skaznik-Wikiel M, Lee H J, Adams G B, Niikura Y, Tschudy K S, Tilly J C, Cortes M L, Forkert R, Spitzer T, Iacomini J, Scadden D T, Tilly J L. Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell, 2005, 122(2): 303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neto F T L, Bach P V, Najari B B, Li P S, Goldstein M. Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2016, 59: 10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller F, Tora L. TBP2 is a general transcription factor specialized for female germ cells. Journal of Biology, 2009, 8(11): 97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Izaguirre M F, Casco V H. E-cadherin roles in animal biology: a perspective on thyroid hormone-influence. Cell Communication and Signaling, 2016, 14(1): 27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahimi M, Bakhtiarizadeh M R, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A. OOgenesis_Pred: a sequence-based method for predicting oogenesis proteins by six different modes of Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2017, 414: 128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakhtiarizadeh M R, Rahimi M, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, Shariati J V, Salami S A. PrESOgenesis: a two-layer multi-label predictor for identifying fertility-related proteins using support vector machine and pseudo amino acid composition approach. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 9025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Le N Q K. Fertility-GRU: Identifying fertility-related proteins by incorporating deep-gated recurrent units and original position-specific scoring matrix profiles. Journal of Proteome Research, 2019, 18(9): 3503–3511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu X, Yu L. EPSOL: sequence-based protein solubility prediction using multidimensional embedding. Bioinformatics, 2021, 37(23): 4314–4320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Q, Wan J, Wang G. A survey on computational methods in discovering protein inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(1): bbab416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao X, Wang H, Li H, Wu Y, Wang G. Identifying plant pentatricopeptide repeat proteins using a variable selection method. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 506681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao Z, Li Y, Teng Z, Zhao Y. A method for identifying vesicle transport proteins based on LibSVM and MRMD. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2020, 2020: 8926750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Z, Wang P, Liu Z, Zhao Y. Discrimination of thermophilic proteins and non-thermophilic proteins using feature dimension reduction. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 584807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Q, Li H, Liu Y, Li J, Wu C, Tang H. Exosomal non-coding RNAs: new insights into the biology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current Oncology, 2022, 29(8): 5383–5406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(D1): D480–D489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasan M M, Tsukiyama S, Cho J Y, Kurata H, Alam A, Liu X, Manavalan B, Deng H W. Deepm5C: a deep-learning-based hybrid framework for identifying human RNA N5-methylcytosine sites using a stacking strategy. Molecular Therapy, 2022, 30(8): 2856–2867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeon Y J, Hasan M, Park H W, Lee K W, Manavalan B. TACOS: a novel approach for accurate prediction of cell-specific long noncoding RNAs subcellular localization. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(4): bbac243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Z, Zhao P, Li F, Leier A, Marquez-Lago T T, Wang Y, Webb G I, Smith A I, Daly R J, Chou K C, Song J. iFeature: a Python package and Web server for features extraction and selection from protein and peptide sequences. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(14): 2499–2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Awais M, Hussain W, Rasool N, Khan Y D. iTSP-PseAAC: identifying tumor suppressor proteins by using fully connected neural network and PseAAC. Current Bioinformatics, 2021, 16(5): 700–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romdhane T F, Alhichri H, Ouni R, Atri M. Electrocardiogram heartbeat classification based on a deep convolutional neural network and focal loss. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2020, 123: 103866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alguwaizani S, Ren S, Huang D S, Han K. Predicting interactions between pathogen and human proteins based on the relation between sequence length and amino acid composition. Current Bioinformatics, 2021, 16(6): 799–806

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu L, Wang M, Yang Y, Xu F, Zhang X, Xie F, Gao L, Li X. Predicting therapeutic drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma based on tissue-specific pathways. PLoS Computational Biology, 2021, 17(2): e1008696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed Z, Zulfiqar H, Khan A A, Gul I, Dao F Y, Zhang Z Y, Yu X L, Tang L. iThermo: a sequence-based model for identifying thermophilic proteins using a multi-feature fusion strategy. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13: 790063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bian H, Guo M, Wang J. Recognition of mitochondrial proteins in plasmodium based on the tripeptide composition. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020, 8: 578901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosen F, Mahmud S M H, Ahmed K, Chen W, Moni M A, Deng H W, Shoombuatong W, Hasan M. DeepDNAbP: a deep learning-based hybrid approach to improve the identification of deoxyribonucleic acid-binding proteins. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2022, 145: 105433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang L, Gao H, Wu K, Zhang H, Li C, Tang L. Identification of cancerlectins by using cascade linear discriminant analysis and optimal g-gap tripeptide composition. Current Bioinformatics, 2020, 15(6): 528–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng Z P, Zhang C T. Prediction of membrane protein types based on the hydrophobic index of amino acids. Journal of Protein Chemistry, 2000, 19(4): 269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sokal R R, Thomson B A. Population structure inferred by local spatial autocorrelation: an example from an Amerindian tribal population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006, 129(1): 121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Horne D S. Prediction of protein helix content from an autocorrelation analysis of sequence hydrophobicities. Biopolymers, 1988, 27(3): 451–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hasan M, Schaduangrat N, Basith S, Lee G, Shoombuatong W, Manavalan B. HLPpred-Fuse: improved and robust prediction of hemolytic peptide and its activity by fusing multiple feature representation. Bioinformatics, 2020, 36(11): 3350–3356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manavalan B, Patra M C. MLCPP 2.0: an updated cell-penetrating peptides and their uptake efficiency predictor. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2022, 434(11): 167604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J, Zhang L, Jia L, Ren Y, Yu G. Protein-protein interactions prediction using a novel local conjoint triad descriptor of amino acid sequences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2017, 18(11): 2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chou K C. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition. Proteins, 2001, 43(3): 246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naseer S, Hussain W, Khan Y D, Rasool N. NPalmitoylDeep-pseAAC: a predictor of N-palmitoylation sites in proteins using deep representations of proteins and PseAAC via modified 5-steps rule. Current Bioinformatics, 2021, 16(2): 294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lv H, Yan K, Guo Y, Zou Q, Hesham A E L, Liu B. AMPpred-EL: an effective antimicrobial peptide prediction model based on ensemble learning. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2022, 146: 105577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chou K C. Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(1): 10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dao F Y, Lv H, Zhang Z Y, Lin H. BDselect: a package for k-mer selection based on the binomial distribution. Current Bioinformatics, 2022, 17(3): 238–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaban T F, Alkawareek M Y. Prediction of qualitative antibiofilm activity of antibiotics using supervised machine learning techniques. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2022, 140: 105065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ao C, Zou Q, Yu L. RFhy-m2G: identification of RNA N2-methylguanosine modification sites based on random forest and hybrid features. Methods, 2021, 203: 32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao S, Wang P, Feng Y, Xie X, Duan M, Fan Y, Liu S, Huang L, Zhou F. RIFS2D: a two-dimensional version of a randomly restarted incremental feature selection algorithm with an application for detecting low-ranked biomarkers. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 133: 104405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rigatti S J. Random forest. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 2017, 47(1): 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ao C, Zou Q, Yu L. NmRF: identification of multispecies RNA 2’-O-methylation modification sites from RNA sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2021, 23(1): bbab480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakayama J Y, Ho J, Cartwright E, Simpson R, Hertzberg V S. Predictors of progression through the cascade of care to a cure for hepatitis C patients using decision trees and random forests. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 134: 104461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jog A, Carass A, Roy S, Pham D L, Prince J L. Random forest regression for magnetic resonance image synthesis. Medical Image Analysis, 2017, 35: 475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu C, Lin B, Shi K, Zhang Q, Gao R, Yu Z, De Marinis Y, Zhang Y, Liu Z P. PEPRF: identification of essential proteins by integrating topological features of PPI network and sequence-based features via random forest. Current Bioinformatics, 2021, 16(9): 1161–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang Y, Zhou D, Wang Y, Zhang X, Su M, Wang C, Sun Z, Jiang Q, Sun B, Zhang Y. Prediction of transcription factors binding events based on epigenetic modifications in different human cells. Epigenomics, 2020, 12(16): 1443–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Basith S, Lee G, Manavalan B. STALLION: a stacking-based ensemble learning framework for prokaryotic lysine acetylation site prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(1): bbab376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shoombuatong W, Basith S, Pitti T, Lee G, Manavalan B. THRONE: a new approach for accurate prediction of human RNA N7-methylguanosine sites. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2022, 434(11): 167549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cui Y, Zhai Y L, Qi Y Y, Liu X R, Zhao Y F, Lv F, Han L P, Zhao Z Z. The comprehensive analysis of clinical trials registration for IgA nephropathy therapy on ClinicalTrials. gov. Renal Failure, 2022, 44(1): 461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen C, Shi H, Jiang Z, Salhi A, Chen R, Cui X, Yu B. DNN-DTIs: improved drug-target interactions prediction using XGBoost feature selection and deep neural network. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 136: 104676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hutchinson N, Klas K, Carlisle B G, Kimmelman J, Waligora M. How informative were early SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on ClinicalTrials gov. PLoS One, 2022, 17(1): e0262114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang H, Luo Y, Ren X, Wu M, He X, Peng B, Deng K, Yan D, Tang H, Lin H. Risk prediction of diabetes: big data mining with fusion of multifarious physical examination indicators. Information Fusion, 2021, 75: 140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dao F Y, Lv H, Zulfiqar H, Yang H, Su W, Gao H, Ding H, Lin H. A computational platform to identify origins of replication sites in eukaryotes. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2021, 22(2): 1940–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Joshi P, Vedhanayagam M, Ramesh R. An ensembled SVM based approach for predicting adverse drug reactions. Current Bioinformatics, 2021, 16(3): 422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Usman S M, Khalid S, Bashir S. A deep learning based ensemble learning method for epileptic seizure prediction. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 136: 104710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jiang Q, Wang G, Jin S, Li Y, Wang Y. Predicting human microRNA-disease associations based on support vector machine. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics, 2013, 8(3): 282–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu L, Xia M, An Q. A network embedding framework based on integrating multiplex network for drug combination prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2021, 23(1): bbab364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang S, Jiang H, Gao B, Yang W, Wang G. Identification of diagnostic markers for breast cancer based on differential gene expression and pathway network. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2022, 9: 811585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sun Z, Huang Q, Yang Y, Li S, Lv H, Zhang Y, Lin H, Ning L. PSnoD: identifying potential snoRNA-disease associations based on bounded nuclear norm regularization. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(4): bbac240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Xu Z, Luo M, Lin W, Xue G, Wang P, Jin X, Xu C, Zhou W, Cai Y, Yang W, Nie H, Jiang Q. DLpTCR: an ensemble deep learning framework for predicting immunogenic peptide recognized by T cell receptor. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2021, 22(6): bbab335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lv Z, Wang P, Zou Q, Jiang Q. Identification of sub-Golgi protein localization by use of deep representation learning features. Bioinformatics, 2020, 36(24): 5600–5609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Song G, Wang G, Luo X, Cheng Y, Song Q, Wan J, Moore C, Song H, Jin P, Qian J, Zhu H. An all-to-all approach to the identification of sequence-specific readers for epigenetic DNA modifications on cytosine. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lv H, Dao F Y, Lin H. DeepKla: an attention mechanism-based deep neural network for protein lysine lactylation site prediction. iMeta, 2022, 1(1): e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kopylov A T, Papysheva O, Gribova I, Kaysheva A L, Kotaysch G, Kharitonova L, Mayatskaya T, Nurbekov M K, Schipkova E, Terekhina O, Morozov S G. Severe types of fetopathy are associated with changes in the serological proteome of diabetic mothers. Medicine, 2021, 100(45): e27829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pla I, Sanchez A, Pors S E, Pawlowski K, Appelqvist R, Sahlin K B, La Cour Poulsen L, Marko-Varga G, Andersen C Y, Malm J. Proteome of fluid from human ovarian small antral follicles reveals insights in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation. Human Reproduction, 2021, 36(3): 756–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Li C, Song C, Qi K, Liu Y, Dou Y, Li X, Qiao R, Wang K, Han X, Li X. Identification of estrus in sows based on salivary proteomics. Animals, 2022, 12(13): 1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Li D Y, Yang X X, Tu C F, Wang W L, Meng L L, Lu G X, Tan Y Q, Zhang Q J, Du J. Sperm flagellar 2 (SPEF2) is essential for sperm flagellar assembly in humans. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2022, 24(4): 359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang Z Y, Ning L, Ye X, Yang Y H, Futamura Y, Sakurai T, Lin H. iLoc-miRNA: extracellular/intracellular miRNA prediction using deep BiLSTM with attention mechanism. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(5): bbac395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang L, Yang Y, Chai L, Li Q, Liu J, Lin H, Liu L. A deep learning model to identify gene expression level using cobinding transcription factor signals. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(1): bbab501

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Sichuan Major Science and Technology Project (2021ZDZX0009); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 035Z2060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Yan Lin, De Wu & Junjie Zhang

  2. School of Life Science and Technology and Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China

    Jiashu Wang, Xiaowei Liu, Xueqin Xie & Hui Ding

Authors
  1. Yan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiashu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaowei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xueqin Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. De Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junjie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hui Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Lin or Hui Ding.

Additional information

Yan Lin, a professor of Animal Nutrition Institute at Sichuan Agricultural University, China. Her research is in the areas of animal nutrition and feed science.

Jiashu Wang, a master candidate of Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China. His research interests include bioinformatics and machine learning.

Xiaowei Liu, a master candidate of Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China. Her research interests include bioinformatics, machine learning and drug development.

Xueqin Xie, a master candidate of Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China. Her research interests are bioinformatics, machine learning and biomarker prediction.

De Wu, a professor of Animal Nutrition Institute at Sichuan Agricultural University, China. His research is in the areas of animal nutrition and feed science.

Junjie Zhang, a professor of College of Life Science at Sichuan Agricultural University, China. His research is in the areas of molecular biology of starch synthesis in maize.

Hui Ding, an associate professor of Center for Informational Biology at University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China. Her research is in the areas of computational biology and system biology.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Y., Wang, J., Liu, X. et al. A computational model to identify fertility-related proteins using sequence information. Front. Comput. Sci. 18, 181902 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-022-2559-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-022-2559-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation