Skip to main content
Log in

Deciding on the wing: in-flight decision making and search space sampling in the red dwarf honeybee Apis florea

  • Published:
Swarm Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During reproductive swarming and seasonal migration, a honeybee swarm needs to locate and move to a new, suitable nest site. While the nest-site selection process in cavity-nesting species such as the European honeybee Apis mellifera is very precise with the swarm carefully selecting a single site, open-nesting species, such as Apis florea, lack such precision. These differences in precision in the nest-site selection process are thought to arise from the differing nest-site requirements of open- and cavity-nesting species. While A. florea can nest on almost any tree, A. mellifera is constrained by the scarcity of suitable nest sites. Here we show that imprecision in the nest-site selection process allows swarms to quickly reach a decision when many nest sites are available. In contrast, a very precise nest-site selection process slows down the decision-making process when nest sites are abundant.

Nest-site selection in A. florea appears to be more similar to search-space sampling than to a decision-making process. Bees appear to scout the environment for general areas in which potential nest sites are abundant. Bees involved in searching the environment for suitable nest sites are also involved in guiding the swarm once the decision to depart has been made. Generally A. florea swarms exhibit a lack of consensus in the direction indicated by dancers prior to take-off. Because of this lack of consensus a swarm of A. florea will need to determine its exact direction of travel while in flight. We show that in the absence of directional consensus a swarm of bees can still be guided towards an area containing suitable nest sites provided directional dissent is not too great and nest sites are abundant. However, if the swarm needs to move to a very specific location (a single point in space), directional dissent should be avoided, resulting in a more lengthy decision-making process prior to departure. We further show that the guidance mechanism of bee swarms, so-called ‘streaking’, functions both when directional dissent is present and when it is absent, making it a more general mechanism of group movement than previously thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballerini, M., Cabibbo, N., Candelier, R., Cavagna, A., Cisbani, E., Giardina, I., Lecomte, V., Orlandi, A., Parisi, G., Procaccini, A., Viale, M., & Zdravkovic, V. (2008). Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 1232–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, M., Fathke, R., & Seeley, T. (2006). How does an informed minority of scouts guide a honey bee swarm as it flies to its new home? Animal Behaviour, 71(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, M., Gloag, R. S., Even, N., Wattanachaiyingcharoen, W., & Oldroyd, B. P. (2008). Dance precision of Apis florea—clues to the evolution of the honeybee dance language? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1259–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camazine, S., Visscher, P. K., Finley, J., & Vetter, R. S. (1999). House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors. Insectes Sociaux, 46, 348–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433, 513–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwold, K., Beekman, M., & Middendorf, M. (2010). Bee nest site selection as an optimization process. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on the synthesis and simulation of living systems (Alife XII) (pp. 626–633). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch, K. (1967). The dance language and orientation of bees. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardina, I. (2008). Collective behavior in animal groups: theoretical models and empirical studies. HFSP Journal, 2, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. J., & Gordon, D. M. (2007). Interaction rate informs harvester ant task decisions. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson, S., Middendorf, M., & Beekman, M. (2005). Honeybee swarms: how do scouts guide a swarm of uninformed bees? Animal Behaviour, 70, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson, S., Middendorf, M., & Beekman, M. (2006). Searching for a new home—scouting behavior of honeybee swarms. Behavioral Ecology pp. 384–392.

  • Latty, T., Duncan, M., & Beekman, M. (2009). High bee traffic disrupts transfer of directional information in flying honeybee swarms. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, M. (1955). Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 37, 263–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C., Elsholtz, C., & Seeley, T. D. (2009). Independence and interdependence in collective decision making: an agent-based model of nest-site choice by honeybee swarms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, J. C., Oldroyd, B. P., Schaerf, T. M., Wattanachaiyingcharoen, W., & Beekman, M. (2011). Moving home: nest-site selection in the red dwarf honeybee (Apis florea). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1095-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, E., Pratt, S., & Franks, N. (2001). Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerscough, M. R. (2003). Dancing for a decision: a matrix model for nest-site choice by honeybees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 577–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino, K. M., & Seeley, T. D. (2006). Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdriau, B. S., & Myerscough, M. R. (2007). Making good choices with variable information: a stochastic model for nest-site selection by honeybees. Biology Letters 3, 140–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Sumpter, D. J., & Franks, N. R. (2002). Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaerf, T. M., Myerscough, M. R., Makinson, J. C., & Beekman, M. (2011, submitted). A model for the nest site selection process of Apis florea. Animal Behaviour .

  • Schneirla, T. C. (1971). The army ants: a study in social organization. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. M., Passino, K. M., & Seeley, T. D. (2008). The mechanism of flight guidance in honeybee swarms: subtle guides or streaker bees? Journal of Experimental Biology, 7, 3287–3295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (1977). Measurement of nest cavity volume by the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 201–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (2003). Consensus building during nest-site selection in honey bee swarms: the expiration of dissent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Buhrman, S. C. (1999). Group decision making in swarms of honeybees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Buhrman, S. C. (2001). Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the “best-of-n” decision rule. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Morse, R. A. (1978). Nest site selection by the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insectes Sociaux, 25, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Visscher, P. K. (2003). Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 511–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Visscher, P. K. (2004a). Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie, 35, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Visscher, P. K. (2004b). Quorum sensing during nest-site selection by honeybee swarms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 594–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Visscher, P. K. (2008). Sensory coding of nest-site value in honeybee swarms. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 3691–3697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., Morse, R. A. & Visscher, P. K., (1979). The natural history of the flight of honey bee swarms. Psyche, 86, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., Seeley, R. H., & Akratanakul, P. (1982). Colony defense strategies of the honeybees in Thailand. Ecological Monographs, 54, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J. L., & Petit, O. (2010). Sequence of quorums during collective decision making in macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1875–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010). Collective animal behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, P. K., & Camazine, S. (1999). Collective decisions and cognition in bees. Nature, 397, 400–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. L. (1987). The biology of the honey bee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wongsiri, S., Lekprayoon, C., Thapa, R., Thirakupt, K., Rinderer, T. E., Sylvester, H. A., Oldroyd, B. P., & Booncham, U. (1996). Comparative biology of Apis andreniformis and Apis florea in Thailand. Bee World 77, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konrad Diwold.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Human Frontier Science Program, Research Grant “Optimization in natural systems: ants, bees and slime moulds”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diwold, K., Schaerf, T.M., Myerscough, M.R. et al. Deciding on the wing: in-flight decision making and search space sampling in the red dwarf honeybee Apis florea . Swarm Intell 5, 121–141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-011-0054-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-011-0054-z

Keywords

Navigation