Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A method to determine customer-specific volume flexibility in a supply network

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volume flexibility is a crucial factor to keep up performance in supply networks. In order to align volume flexibility requirements along the various supply chains within the networks, contracts defining flexibility ranges are set up increasingly in customer–supplier relationships. However, suppliers lack suitable methods to evaluate the limits of volume flexibility that they can guarantee in terms of a contract, especially if they are members of several cross-linked supply chains. Hence, this article presents an approach to evaluate customer-specific volume flexibility. Therefore, factors influencing volume flexibility are modelled mathematically. Subsequently, a dedicated simulation system is introduced to evaluate volume flexibility of different demand scenarios in terms of flexibility range as well as adjustment time and costs. Finally, the interpretation of the simulation results is demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abele E, Reinhart G (2011) Zukunft der Produktion. Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  2. Westkämper E, Zahn E, Balve P, Tilebein M (2000) Ansätze zur Wandlungsfähigkeit von Produktionsunternehmen. wt Werkstattstechnik online 90(1–2):22–26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaluza B, Blecker T (eds) (2005) Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität: Strategien und Konzepte für wandlungsfähige Unternehmen. Schmidt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibilty in manufacturing. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 2(4):289–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Toni A, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility. Int J Prod Res 36(6):1587–1617

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DH, Paterson A, Sharp JA (2000) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122:41–57

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Meier H, Golembiewski M, Quade N (2008) Design concept for a transparent supply chain. Prod Eng 2(3):311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsay AA, Nahmias S, Agrawal N (2003) Modelling supply chain contracts. In: Tayur SR et al (eds) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 299–336

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez-Padilla A, Duvallet J, Llerena D (2005) Contract typology as a research method in supply chain management. In: Kotzab H et al (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 525–538

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessinger C, Pieper H (2005) Managing risk with structured supply agreements. In: An C, Fromm H (eds) Supply chain management on demand. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Schnetzler M, Nölle A, Hasenfuss K, Iliev N, Ziegenbein A (2006) Supply Chain Management und Unternehmenserfolg: Trends und Herausforderungen. BWI/IFA, Zurich/Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barthel H (2006) Modell zur Analyse und Gestaltung des Bestellverhaltens für die variantenreiche Serienproduktion, IPA-IAO Forschung und Praxis 449. Jost-Jetter, Heimsheim

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wildemann H (2010) Logistik Prozeßmanagement, 5th edn. TCW Transfer-Centrum-Verlag, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nyhuis P, Heinen T, Reinhart G, Rimpau C, Abele E, Wörn A (2008) Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme: Theoretischer Hintergrund zur Wandlungsfähigkeit von Produktionssystemen. wt Werkstattstechnik online 98(1–2):85–91

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jack EP, Raturi A (2002) Sources of volume flexibility and their impact on performance. J Oper Manag 20(5):519–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slack N (1983) Flexibility as a manufacturing objective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 3(3):4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Das SK (1996) The measurement of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 8(1):67–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jack EP, Raturi AS (2003) Measuring and comparing volume flexibility in the capital goods industry. Prod Oper Manag 12(4):480–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinhart G, Krebs P, Rimpau C, Czechowski D (2007) Flexibilitätsbewertung in der Praxis. wt Werkstattstechnik online 97(4):211–217

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang YC (2008) Evaluating flexibility on order quantity and delivery lead time for a supply chain system. Int J Syst Sci 39(12):1193–1202

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogalski S (2009) Entwicklung einer Methodik zur Flexibilitätsbewertung von Produktionssystemen, Reihe Informationsmanagement im Engineering Karlsruhe 2-2009. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rühl J (2010) Monetäre Flexibilitäts- und Risikobewertung, Forschungsberichte aus dem wbk Institut für Produktionstechnik Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) 159. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chryssolouris G (1996) Flexibility and its measurement. Ann CIRP 45(2):581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abele E, Liebeck T, Wörn A (2006) Measuring flexibility in investment decisions for manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 55(1):433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiendahl HP, Breithaupt JW (1998) Kapazitätshüllkurven: Darstellung flexibler Kapazitäten mit einem einfachen Beschreibungsmodell. Ind Manag 14(4):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gottschalk LL (2007) Flexibilitätsprofile. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta YP, Goyal S (1989) Flexibility of manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 43(2):119–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerwin D (1989) Manufacturing flexibility in the CAM Era. Bus Horiz 32(1):78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jordan WC, Graves SC (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Manag Sci 41(4):577–594

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Swaminathan JM, Tayur SR (2003) Stochastic programming models for managing product variety. In: Tayur SR et al (eds) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 585–624

    Google Scholar 

  32. Raturi AS, Jack EP (2004) Creating a volume-flexible firm. Bus Horiz 47(6):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvador F, Rungtusanatham M, Forza C, Trentin A (2007) Mix flexibility and volume flexibility in a build-to-order environment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 27(11):1173–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reinhart G, Schellmann H (2011) A simulation based approach to evaluate customer-specific volume flexibility of a manufacturing company. In: 18th International annual EurOMA conference, Cambridge, UK, 3–6 July 2011

  35. Wiendahl HP, Reinsch S, Grundmann S (2005) Developing a method for combining capacity utilization, capacity flexibility and logistics cost into an unified approach. Prod Eng XII(2):159–164

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roscher J (2008) Bewertung von Flexibilitätsstrategien für die Endmontage in der Automobilindustrie. Institut für Industrielle Fertigung und Fabrikbetrieb, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lödding H (2008) Verfahren der Fertigungssteuerung, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tsay AA, Lovejoy WS (1999) Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 1(2):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Müller N (2010) Modell für die Beherrschung und Reduktion von Nachfrageschwankungen, Forschungsberichte IWB 236. Utz, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zaeh MF, Mueller N (2007) A modeling approach for evaluating capacity flexibilities in uncertain markets. Int J Manuf Syst 19(3):151–172

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Schellmann H, Reinhart G (2009) Modelling flexible production systems to determine customer-specific volume flexibility. In: Zaeh MF (ed) 3rd International conference on changeable, agile, reconfigurable and virtual production (CARV 2009). Utz, Munich, pp 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reinhart G, Schellmann H (2009) Rahmenkonzept zur Ermittlung kundenspezifischer Mengenflexibilität. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb (ZWF) 104(7–8):546–551

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ (2001) Introduction to operations research, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  44. Michalewicz Z, Fogel DB (2004) How to solve it: modern heuristics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Reinhart G, Schellmann H (2009) Vorgehen zur Ermittlung kundenspezifischer Mengenflexibilitätspotentiale im Wertschöpfungsnetz, Vernetzt Planen und Produzieren VPP2009, Chemnitz 17 September 2009

  46. Wöhe G, Döring U (2010) Einführung in die allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, 24th edn. Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere thanks to the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the generous support of the work described in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial Management (iwb), Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Garching, Germany

    Gunther Reinhart & Hendrik Schellmann

Authors
  1. Gunther Reinhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hendrik Schellmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik Schellmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinhart, G., Schellmann, H. A method to determine customer-specific volume flexibility in a supply network. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6, 69–78 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0356-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0356-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation