Skip to main content
Log in

A contribution to collision free trajectory planning for 6r robots in varying environments

  • Machine Tool
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In flexible und complex handling systems trajectory planning becomes increasingly demanding. As an example, the geometry of the work pieces tends to vary more than it used to. Therefore, the planned trajectory of the handling robot has to either be adjusted for each piece individually or the trajectory has to allow general geometry. This leads to performance loss for smaller work pieces since they are less sensitive to obstacles and can therefore be moved on shorter (faster) trajectories. In both cases, time and costs could be reduced. Another characteristic of handling systems is that several handling robots share the same workspace. Again the positions of these obstacles are only known at runtime. This places great demands on the planning tools. In this paper, it is shown that both problems can be treated with a hybrid method called curve flow method. This method combines a gradient flow which comes from a variational principle and a potential field method. The variational principle makes the planned trajectories short, the potential field prevents collision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Groh K, Röck S (2010) A contribution to collision-free trajectory planning for handling systems in varying environments. J Prod Eng Res Dev 4(1):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavraki LE, LaValle SM (2008) Motion planing. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Minguez J, Lamiraux F, Laumond J-P (2008) Motion planning and obstacle avoidance. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. LaValle SM (2006) Planning algorithms. Cambridge

  5. Eschenburg J-H, Jost J (2007) Differentialgeometrie und Minimalflächen, vol 2. Springer, Auflage

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chou KS, Zhu X-P (2001) The curve shortening problem. CRC

  7. Deckelnick K, Dziuk G, Elliot CM (2005) Computation of geometric partial differential equations and mean curvature flows. Acta Numer, 139–232

  8. Vesely F (2011) http://homepage.univie.ac.at/franz.vesely/notes/hard_sticks/hst/hst.html. Last time checked: 28 Nov 2011

  9. Allen MP, Evans GT, Frenkel D, Mulder BM (1993) Hard convex body fluids. In Prigogine I, Rice SA (eds) Advances in chemical physics, vol 86. pp 1–166

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financial support of the project within the Graduate School of advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (GSaME) at the University of Stuttgart. Furthermore, we would like to thank the reviewers for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konrad Groh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groh, K., Verl, A. A contribution to collision free trajectory planning for 6r robots in varying environments. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6, 297–302 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0378-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0378-6

Keywords

Navigation