Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of interconnected production sites taking into account multidimensional uncertainties

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The production sites of international companies are becoming increasingly interconnected. Due to the uncertainty of multiple factors, determining a location is a strategic choice entailing high financial risk. For this reason, a method for site evaluation was developed allowing multidimensional, i.e., both quantitative and qualitative, uncertainties to be taken into account. The uncertainties are modeled with both probability and fuzzy-set theory and integrated into a modular-structured monetary calculation model. For the analysis and interpretation of evaluation results, methods have been developed which allow risk assessment. The developed method provides a way to handle existing location risks and can thus ensure the success of manufacturing companies in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abele E, Reinhart G (2011) Zukunft der Produktion: Herausforderungen, Forschungsfelder, Chancen. Hanser, Munich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Reithofer N (2010) Mobilität neu gedacht. In: Tagungsband Münchener Kolloquium—Innovationen für die Produktion 2010. Utz, Munich, pp 19–30

  3. Milberg J, Möller N (2008) Valuation of changeable production systems. Prod Eng 2(4):417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohler K (2008) Global supply chain design: Konzeption und Implementierung eines multikriteriellen Optimierungsmodells für die Gestaltung globaler Wertschöpfungsaktivitäten. Dissertation, CfSM Centrum für Supply Management, Estenfeld

  5. Sihn W, Hillbrand C, F Meizer (2010) Development of a Simulation Model for Multimodal, Cross-Company Logistics Networks. In: Dangelmaier W, Blecken A, Delius R, Klöpfer S (eds) Advanced manufacturing and sustainable logistics. Springer, Berlin, pp 26–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinkel S, Maloca, S (2009) Produktionsverlagerungen und Rückverlagerungen in Zeiten der Krise. Mitteilungen aus der ISI Erhebung, Ausgabe 52, Karlsruhe

  7. Meyer T (2006) Globale Produktionsnetzwerke: Ein Modell zur kostenoptimierten Standortwahl. Dissertation, Shaker, Aachen

  8. Canada JR, Sullivan WG (1989) Economic and multiattribute evaluation of advanced manufacturing systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunning JH, Lundan SM (2008) Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klibi W, Martel A, Guitouni A (2010) The design of robust value creating supply chain networks: a critical review. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):283–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanza G, Ude J (2010) Muldimensional evaluation of value added networks. CRIP Ann Manuf Technol 59:489–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Albrecht F, Hueske B (2010) Systemdenken in der globalen Produktionsnetzwerkplanung: Beherrschung der Komplexität bei Standortentscheidungen durch einen systemorientierten Ansatz. ZwF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 100(4):264–270

    Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder LV (2006) Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Trans 38(7):547–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abele E, Kluge J, Näher U (2006) Handbuch globale Produktion. Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vos B, Akkermans H (1996) Capturing the dynamics of facility allocation. Int J Oper Res Prod Manag 16(11):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan FTS, Chan HK, Chan MH, Humphreys PK (2006) An integrated fuzzy approach for the selection of manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(7):747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Denkena B, Blümel P, Lorenzen L (2007) Total benefits of ownership: Verfahren zur Bewertung des Unternehmensnutzens von Investitionsalternativen. wt Werkstattstechnik—online 97(7/8):560–566

  18. Grundig C (2006) Fabrikplanung: Planungssystematik—Methoden—Anwendungen, 2nd edn. Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abele E, Liebeck T, Merz N (2008) Globale Produktion – eine Frage des Standorts?: Wie Unternehmen systematisch die Struktur ihres Produktionsnetzwerks gestalten können. wt Werkstattstechnik—online 98(1/2):92–97

  20. Berndt R, Altobelli CF (1998) Springers Handbuch der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hummel B (1997) Internationale Standortentscheidung: Einflußfaktoren, informatorische Fundierung und Unterstützung durch computergestützte Informationssysteme. Haufe, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenkranz F, Missler-Behr M (2005) Unternehmensrisiken erkennen und managen: Einführung in die quantitative Planung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brieke M (2009) Erweiterte Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung in der Fabrikplanung (EWR). Dissertation, Leibniz Universität Hannover

  24. Zäh MF, Möller N, Sudhoff W (2005) A framework for the valuation of Changeable Manufacturing Systems. CIRP 3rd international conference on reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Ann Arbor

  25. Zäh MF, Sudhoff W, Möller N (2005) Quantitative modeling of mobile production scenarios. 38th CIRP international seminar on manufacturing systems, Florianopolis

  26. Merchiers A (2008) Bewertung globaler Standortstrukturalternativen im Maschinenbau. Dissertation, Apprimus-Verl., Aachen

  27. Liang GS, Wang MJ (1991) A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for facility site selection. Int J Prod Res 29(11):2313–2330

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chou S, Chang Y, Shen C (2008) A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):132–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Erben RF (2000) Fuzzy-logic-basiertes Risikomanagement: Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Theorie unscharfer Mengen im Rahmen des Risikomanagements von Industriebetrieben unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Beurteilung von Länderrisiken. Dissertation, Shaker, Aachen

  30. Oehmen J (2009) Managing supply chain risks: the example of successful sourcing from China. Dissertation, ETH Zurich

  31. Kuo RJ, Chiand SC, Kao SS (2002) A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Comput Ind 47(2):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heger CL (2007) Bewertung der Wandlungsfähigkeit von Fabrikobjekten. Dissertation, Leibniz Universität Hannover

  33. Nyhuis P, Heinen T, Brieke M (2007) Adequate and economic factory transformability and the effects on logistical performance. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19(3):286–307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Buhmann M, Schön M (2009) Dynamische Standortbewertung—Denken in Szenarien und Optionen. In: Kinkel S (ed) Erfolgsfaktor Standortplanung. In- und ausländische Standorte richtig bewerten. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–302

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kinkel S, Zanker C (2007) Globale Produktionsstrategien in der Automobilzulieferindustrie: Erfolgsmuster und zukunftsorientierte Methoden zur Standortbewertung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yong D (2006) Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(7/8):839–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chu T (2002) Facility location selection using fuzzy topsis under group decisions. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 10(6):687–701

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Rimpau C, Reinhart G (2010) Knowledge-based risk evaluation during the offer calculation of customised products. Prod Eng 4:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bosch K (1996) Großes Lehrbuch der Statistik. Oldenbourg, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smirnow NW, Dunin-Barkowski IW (1963) Mathematische Statistik in der Technik: Kurzer Lehrgang. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cottin C, Döhler S (2009) Risikoanalyse: Modellierung, Beurteilung und Management von Risiken mit Praxisbeispielen. Vieweg+Teubner/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Guiffrida AL, Nagi R (1998) Fuzzy set theory applications in production management research: a literature survey. J Intell Manuf 9(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wong BK, Lai VS (2011) A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998–2009. Int J Prod Econ 129:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zimmermann HJ (1991) Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Kluwer, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang L (1997) A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Diepold KJ, Lohmann B (2010) Transient probabilistic recurrent fuzzy systems. In: IEEE (ed) International conference on systems, Istanbul, pp 3529–3536

  47. Fabrycky WJ, Blanchard BS (1991) Life-cycle cost and economic analysis. Prentice Hall international series in industrial and systems engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  48. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2006) Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Charnes JM (2007) Financial modeling with crystal ball and excel. Wiley finance series. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  50. Buckley J, Eslami E (2002) An introduction to fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets: with 14 tables. Physica-Verl, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Traeger DH (1993) Einführung in die Fuzzy-Logik. Teubner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  53. Di Gesù V, Pal SK, Petrosino A (2009) Fuzzy logic and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Reinhart G, Krebs P, Haas M, Zäh MF (2008) Monetäre Bewertung von Produktionssystemen: Ein Ansatz zur Integration von qualitativen Einflussfaktoren in die monetäre Bewertung unter Unsicherheit. ZwF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 103(12):845–850

    Google Scholar 

  55. Reinhart G, Krebs P, Zaeh MF (2009) Fuzzy Logic-based Integration of Qualitative Uncertainties into Monetary Factory-Evaluations. In: IEE (ed) Seventh IEEE international conference on control and automation, Christchurch, pp 385–391

  56. Reinhart G, Krebs P, Zaeh MF (2009) Holistic Risk Evaluation for Global producing Companies. In: Zaeh et al (eds) 3rd International conference on changeable, agile, reconfigurable and virtual production (CARV) 2009. Utz, Munich, pp 951–960

  57. Korves B, Krebs P (2008) Planung und Bewertung von Flexibilität in Fabrikplanungsprojekten bei der Siemens AG. In: Zäh MF et al (eds) Tagungsband Münchener Kolloquium—Innovationen für die Produktion 2008. Utz, Munich, pp 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  58. Reinhart G, Schindler S, Krebs P (2011) Strategic evaluation of manufacturing technologies. In: Hesselbach J, Herrmann C (eds) Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing, proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–184

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial Management (iwb), Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Garching, Germany

    Pascal Krebs & Gunther Reinhart

Authors
  1. Pascal Krebs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gunther Reinhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Krebs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krebs, P., Reinhart, G. Evaluation of interconnected production sites taking into account multidimensional uncertainties. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6, 587–601 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0409-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0409-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation