Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid cutting of granite by use of ultrasonic assistance

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid technologies offer an important approach to enhance existing limits of conventional cutting manufacturing processes. Superposition of the infeed with adapted ultrasonic vibrations enables reductions of machining forces. This results in diminished tool wear and longer tool life. Furthermore, an increase of removal rates can be achieved. Successful machining of recalcitrant metal-based materials by ultrasonic assisted systems creates a high potential to gain similar effects in machining of mineral-based materials. This will be studied in this article. The state of the art for the machining of stone uses geometrically undefined cutting edges. This paper focuses on the geometrically defined cutting of granite with additional ultrasonic assistance. Cutting tests at a test station with linear cutting motion are being performed. The ultrasonic frequency is maintained at 20 kHz. Different oscillation amplitudes are applied to influence process forces and the wear of the used carbide metal and polycrystalline diamond cutting segments (PCD). A method to observe the wear is developed by use of a stereomicroscope and a 3D measurement system. This will enable conclusions about the applicability of the geometry of the cutting segments and the process parameters. Due to the significant different wear rates of both cutting materials, the cutting force progression by using PCD tools shows completely different characteristics compared to the machining with carbide metal tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neugebauer R, Stoll A, Roscher H-J (2009) Ultraschallunterstützung verbessert Tiefbohren in hochfestem Guss. MM—Maschinenmarkt. Das IndustrieMagazin. http://www.maschinenmarkt.vogel.de/themenkanaele/produktion/zerspanungstechnik/articles/198111. Accessed 20 June 2013

  2. Zäh M (2012) Die Werkzeugmaschine der Zukunft. Leichter schwer zerspanen. 1st edn. Herbert Utz Verlag, Garching, pp 3

  3. Risse A (2012) Fertigungsverfahren der Mechatronik, Feinwerk- und Präzisionsgerätetechnik, 1st edn. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 198–201

  4. Treppe F, Hochmuth C, Schneider R, Junker T, Schneider J, Stoll A (2011) Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz durch hybride Prozesse. Nachhaltige Produktion, Hannover, pp 127–150

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oppermann B (2002) Keramik bleibt hart, aber die harten Zeiten für die Werkzeuge sind vorbei. Industrieanzeiger. http://www.industrieanzeiger.de/automation/-/article/12503/28887548/Keramik-bleibt-hart,-aber-die-harten-Zeiten-f%C3%BCr-die-Werkzeuge-sind%0Avorbei/art_co_INSTANCE_0000/maximized/. Accessed 10 July 2013

  6. Klocke F, Weber A, Bresseler B (2006) Ultraschall steigert Effizienz beim Schleifen sprödharter Werkstoffe. MM—Maschinenmarkt. Das IndustrieMagazin. http://www.maschinenmarkt.vogel.de/themenkanaeleproduktion/spanendefertigung/maschinen/articles/48905. Accessed 11 July 2013

  7. Klocke F, Bresseler B, Weber A (2004) Ultraschallunterstütztes Schleifen—Chancen und Grenzen der Technologie am Beispiel der Zerspanung von Glas und Glaskeramik. wt Werkstattstechnik, online, pp 258–262

  8. Cardoni A, Harkness P, Lucas M (2010) Ultrasonic rock sampling using longitudinal—torsional vibrations. Ultrasonics 50(4–5):447–452

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heisel U, Eisseler R, Eber R, Wallaschek J, Twiefel J, Huang M (2011) Ultrasonic-assisted machining of stone. Prod Eng 587–594. doi:10.1007/s11740-011-0330-1

  10. Brehl DE, Dow TA (2008) Review of vibration-assisted machining. Precis Eng 32:153–172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eber R (2010) Ultraschallunterstützte Bearbeitung von Gestein hat Potential. IFW News

  12. Heisel U, Eber R, Wolf G, Wallaschek J, Twiefel J, Huang M (2011) Investigations on ultrasonic-assisted drilling and milling of stone. In: 1st International conference on stone and concrete machining, pp 117–122

  13. Gerlach, D (2010) nm 15: Kleine Bewegung ganz groß!. Naturstein. pp 64–65

  14. Reichenbächer, H (2010) Trennen mineralischer Werkstoffe mit geometrisch bestimmten Schneiden. Dissertation. University of Kassel

  15. Böhm S, Scherm W, Schwarte S, Heise C (2012) Bearbeitung von Stahlbeton mit geometrisch bestimmter Schneide aus PCD. Diamant Hochleistungswerkzeuge (dihw), pp 28–35

  16. Böhm S, Schwarte S (2012) Machbarkeitsstudie zur Bearbeitung von Stahlbeton mit geometrisch bestimmter Schneide aus PCD. Progressive industrielle Technologien, Minsk, Belarussische Nationale Technische Universität, Internationale wissenschaftlich-technische Konferenz

  17. Böhm S, Schwarte S, Heise C (2013) PKD trennt Ultrahochfesten Beton unaufhaltsam. Diamant-Hochleistungswerkzeuge (dihw), pp 6–12

  18. Achenbach M (2013) Schlag auf Schlag—system-simulation für das Schlagwerk eines elektro-pneumatischen Bohrhammers. Ölhydraulik und Pneumatik, pp 38–41

  19. Pauksch E, Holsten S, Linss M, Tikal F (2008) Zerspantechnik - Prozesse, Werkzeuge. Technologien, Vieweg und Teubner, Kassel

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Heise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heise, C., Böhm, S., Schwarte, S. et al. Hybrid cutting of granite by use of ultrasonic assistance. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 8, 567–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0548-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0548-9

Keywords

Navigation