Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the metalworking fluid on the running behavior of gear analogy test parts

  • Machine Tool
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Boundary layers protect tooth flanks from solid-state contacts and, therefore, influence friction and wear. The characteristics of boundary layers (e.g. structure, chemical composition) and the running behavior of gears are determined by the manufacturing process (Klocke and Broeckmann in Prod Eng Res Dev 8(461):468, 2014; Brecher et al. in Prod Eng Res Dev 7:265–274, 2013). In this paper, the influence of the grinding fluid on the modification of boundary layers is shown. Analogy test parts are manufactured with varying fluids and additives. The differently ground test parts are measured regarding their boundary layer properties. Furthermore, the effects of the different resulting boundary layers on the running behavior are evaluated in finite life fatigue testing (pitting) on the two-disk test rig. By combining both measurement and test results, possible correlations between manufacturing and operation are investigated to establish a more sustainable and economical design of gears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klocke F, Broeckmann C et al (2014) Optimized density profiles for powder metallurgical gears. Prod Eng Res Dev 8(461):468

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brecher C, Brumm M, Hübner F, Henser J (2013) Influence of the manufacturing method on the running behavior of beveloid gears. Prod Eng Res Dev 7:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brecher C, Brumm M, Greschert R (2013) Increase of strength and efficiency of gears by optimized preconditioning processes. International conference on Gears VDI-Berichte 2199.1. VDI Düsseldorf, pp 293–304

  4. Jao TC, Inacker O, Beckmann P, Yatsunami K (2007) Effects of viscosity and surface roughness on gear contact tribological layers. Lubr Sci 19:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Czichos H, Habig KH (2010) Tribologie-Handbuch. Tribometrie, Tribomaterialien, Tribotechnik. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlet P, Dienwiebel M, Scherge M (2010) The effect of sample finishing on the tribology of metal/metal lubricated contacts. Wear 268:1518–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinksmeier E, Walter A (2000) Generation of reaction layers on machined surfaces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 49(1):435–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klocke F, Zeppenfeld C (2007) Mikroverschleißmechanismen und tribologisches Einsatzverhalten von cBN beim Schleifen mit biologisch schnell abbaubaren Kühlschmierstoffen (DFG KL 500/45-1), RWTH Aachen

  9. Schulz J, Holweger W (2010) Wechselwirkung von Additiven mit Metalloberflächen. Expert, Renningen

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gorgels C (2011) Entstehung und Vermeidung von Schleifbrand beim diskontinuierlichen Zahnflankenprofilschleifen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen

  11. Weck M, Hurasky-Schönwerth O, Bugiel C (2003) Service behavior of PVD-coated gearings lubricated with biodegradable synthetic ester oils. Prod Eng Res Dev 10(2):121–126

    Google Scholar 

  12. Höhn BR, Michaelis K, Kreil O (2006) Influence of surface roughness on pressure distribution and film thickness in EHL-contacts. Tribol Int 12:1719–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guideline VDI 2615 (2006) Surface roughness measurement of cylindrical gears and bevel gears by means on stylus-type instruments. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reichelt M, Mayer J et al (2006) TEM and nanomechanical studies on tribological surface modifications formed on roller bearings under controlled lubrication conditions. J Mater Sci 41:4543–4553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Büscher R, Fischer A (2005) The pathways of dynamic recrystallization in allmetal hip joints. Wear 259:887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klocke F, Maßmann T, Gerschwiler K (2005) Combination of PVD tool coatings and biodegradable lubricants in metal forming and machining. Wear 259:1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klocke F, Kuwer C, Zeppenfeld C (2006) Tribological analysis of diverse ceramics in contact with stainless steel under different lubricating conditions. Prod Eng Res Dev 13(2):173–176

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge scientific and financial support by the German Research Foundation (DFG) [Project Number BR 2905/44-1]. Furthermore, we thank Fuchs Europe Schmierstoffe GmbH for their consulting in terms of oil choice and for free supply of the applied oils. As well, we are grateful to Prof. Joachim Schulz, who contributed his ideas and experiences to our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Greschert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brecher, C., Löpenhaus, C. & Greschert, R. Influence of the metalworking fluid on the running behavior of gear analogy test parts. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 9, 425–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0612-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0612-0

Keywords

Navigation