Abstract
The requirements concerning the technical availability as part of the overall equipment effectiveness increase constantly in production nowadays. Unplanned downtimes have to be prevented via efficient methods. Predictive, condition-based maintenance represents a valuable approach for fulfilling these demands, but precise models for state estimation are missing. From the manufacturers’ point of view the challenge consists in wear models with the capability of specifying the correct component’s state as well as providing reliable failure forecasts. Unfortunately, nowadays creation of wear models is based on specific stress tests or design of experiments from the manufacturer. The integration of the production phase or even data feedback and user knowledge does not take place. New potential is promised by cross-cutting technologies from ICT like cloud technologies—in general virtual platform concepts—or approaches of machine learning as enabling technologies. The objective of this paper is to adopt existing algorithms to the new application of condition monitoring in order to evaluate the applicability for automated training of robust wear models. In that context the most commonly used algorithms are described and the reader gets an impression what challenges have to be met when dealing with machine learning. A selection of about ten algorithms with 45 variants is evaluated for four different features within a packaging machine. In the outlook the embedding of the trained model in a cloud architecture is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Qu S, Jian R, Chu T et al. (2014) Computional reasoning and learning for smart manufacturing under realistic conditions. Int Conf Behav Econ Soc Comput (BESC) 1–8. doi:10.1109/BESC.2014.7059529
Ge Z, Zhong S, Zhang Y (2016) Semisupervised kernel learning for FDA model and its application for fault classification in industrial processes. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(4):1403–1411. doi:10.1109/TII.2016.2571680
Beyca OF, Rao PK, Kong Z et al (2016) Heterogeneous sensor data fusion approach for real-time monitoring in ultraprecision machining (UPM) process using non-parametric bayesian clustering and evidence theory. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng 13(2):1033–1044. doi:10.1109/TASE.2015.2447454
Oneto L, Orlandi I, Anguita D (2015) Performance assessment and uncertainty quantification of predictive models for smart manufacturing systems. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp 1436–1445. doi:10.1109/BigData.2015.7363904
Choudhary AK, Harding JA, Tiwari MK (2009) Data mining in manufacturing: a review based on the kind of knowledge. J Intell Manuf 20(5):501–521. doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0145-x
Wang K (2007) Applying data mining to manufacturing: the nature and implications. J Intell Manuf 18(4):487–495. doi:10.1007/s10845-007-0053-5
Sipos R, Fradkin D, Moerchen F et al. (2014) Log-based predictive maintenance. In: KDD ‘14 Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 1867–1876. doi:10.1145/2623330.2623340
Han J, Chi S (2016) Consideration of manufacturing data to apply machine learning methods for predictive manufacturing. 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp 109–113. doi:10.1109/ICUFN.2016.7536995
Zurita D, Carino JA, Picot A et al. (2015) Diagnosis method based on topology codification and neural network applied to an industrial camshaft. 2015 IEEE 10th International Symposium onSymposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), pp 124–130. doi:10.1109/DEMPED.2015.7303679
Uhlmann E, Laghmouchi A, Hohwieler E et al (2015) Condition monitoring in the cloud. Procedia CIRP 38:53–57. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.075
Neuzil J, Kreibich O, Smid R (2014) A distributed fault detection system based on IWSN for machine condition monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):1118–1123. doi:10.1109/TII.2013.2290432
He K, Xu Q, Jia M (2015) Modeling and predicting surface roughness in hard turning using a bayesian inference-based HMM-SVM model. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng 12(3):1092–1103. doi:10.1109/TASE.2014.2369478
Feng Ding, Zhengjia He, Yanyang Zi et al (2008) Application of support vector machine for equipment reliability forecasting. 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp 526–530. doi:10.1109/INDIN.2008.4618157
Madhusudana CK, Kumar H, Narendranath S (2016) Condition monitoring of face milling tool using K-star algorithm and histogram features of vibration signal. Eng Sci Technol Int J. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2016.05.009
Keskes H, Braham A (2015) Recursive undecimated wavelet packet transform and DAG SVM for induction motor diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 11(5):1059–1066. doi:10.1109/TII.2015.2462315
Jiang W, Zhang Z, Li F et al (2016) Joint label consistent dictionary learning and adaptive label prediction for semisupervised machine fault classification. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(1):248–256. doi:10.1109/TII.2015.2496272
Tang P, Chow TWS (2016) Wireless sensor-networks conditions monitoring and fault diagnosis using neighborhood hidden conditional random field. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(3):933–940. doi:10.1109/TII.2016.2537758
Li W, Zhang S, Rakheja S (2016) Feature denoising and nearest–farthest distance preserving projection for machine fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(1):393–404. doi:10.1109/TII.2015.2475219
Zhao C, Li J, Huang N (2016) Efficient algorithms for analysis and improvement of flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng 13(1):105–121. doi:10.1109/TASE.2015.2434054
Adly F, Alhussein O, Yoo PD et al (2015) Simplified subspaced regression network for identification of defect patterns in semiconductor wafer maps. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 11(6):1267–1276. doi:10.1109/TII.2015.2481719
Al-Habaibeh A, Gindy N (2001) Self-learning algorithm for automated design of condition monitoring systems for milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(6):448–459. doi:10.1007/s001700170054
Scholz-Reiter B, Heger J, Hildebrandt T (2010) Gaussian Processes for Dispatching Rule Selection in Production Scheduling: Comparison of Learning Techniques. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp 631–638. doi:10.1109/ICDMW.2010.19
Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G et al (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010
Carino JA, Zurita D, Picot A et al (2015) Novelty detection methodology based on multi-modal one-class support vector machine: 1–4 Sept. 2015, Guarda, Portugal. 2015 IEEE 10th International Symposium onSymposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), pp 184–190. doi:10.1109/DEMPED.2015.7303688
Brecher C, Weck M (2006) Werkzeugmaschinen 3, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin
Brecher C (ed) (2010) ZuPack: Zustandsorientierte Instandhaltung von Verpackungsmaschinen. Verfügbarkeit von Produktionssystemen als Dienstleistung. Apprimus-Verlag, Aachen
Wu X, Kumar V (2009) The top ten algorithms in data mining. Chapman & Hall/CRC data mining and knowledge discovery series. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the support of the depicted research within the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brecher, C., Obdenbusch, M. & Buchsbaum, M. Optimized state estimation by application of machine learning. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 11, 133–143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0724-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0724-9