Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-organization of sensor networks for detection of pervasive faults

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resource aware operation of sensor networks requires adaptive re-organization to dynamically adapt to the operational environment. A complex dynamical system of interacting components (e.g., computer network and social network) is represented as a graph, component states as spins, and interactions as ferromagnetic couplings. Using an Ising-like model, the sensor network is shown to adaptively self-organize based on partial observation, and real-time monitoring and detection is enabled by adaptive redistribution of limited resources. The algorithm is validated on a test-bed that simulates the operations of a sensor network for detection of percolating faults (e.g. computer viruses, infectious disease, chemical weapons, and pollution) in an interacting multi-component complex system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., Turon, M.: Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. In: SenSys ’06: Proc. of the 4th Intl. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 427–428. ACM, New York (2006)

  2. Brooks R., Friedlander D., Koch J., Phoha S.: Tracking multiple targets with self-organizing distributed ground sensors. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 64(7), 874–884 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szewczyk R., Osterweil E., Polastre J., Hamilton M., Mainwaring A., Estrin D.: Habitat monitoring with sensor networks. Commun. ACM 47(6), 34–40 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akyildiz I., Su W., Sankarasubramaniam Y., Cayirci E.: Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 38, 393–422 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray A.: Symbolic dynamic analysis of complex systems for anomaly detection. Signal Processing 84(7), 1115–1130 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Albért R., Barabási A.-L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74(1), 47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianconi G., Barabási A.-L.: Bose–Einstein condensation in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5632–5635 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strogatz S.: Exploring complex netwoks. Nature (London) 410, 268–276 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang K.: Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta S., Ray A.: Pattern identification using lattice spin systems: a thermodynamic formalism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(19), 194105 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greco A., Carbone V., Sorriso-Valvo L.: Non-poisson intermittent events in price formation in a Ising spin model of market. Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 376, 480–486 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakk A., Høye J.: One-dimensional Ising model applied to protein folding. Phys. A 323(1–4), 504–518 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Indekeu J.: Special attention network. Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 333, 461–464 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman M., Barkema G.: Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastav A., Ray A., Gupta S.: An information-theoretic measure for anomaly detection in complex dynamical systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Processing 23(2), 358–371 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hethcote H.W.: The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Rev. 42(4), 599–653 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cover T., Thomas J.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreiber T.: Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461–464 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asok Ray.

Additional information

This work has been supported in part by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Research Office (ARO) under Grant No. W911NF-07-1-0376, by NASA under Cooperative Agreement No. NNX07AK49A, and by the U.S. Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-08-1-0380.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastav, A., Ray, A. Self-organization of sensor networks for detection of pervasive faults. SIViP 4, 99–104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-008-0101-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-008-0101-4

Keywords

Navigation