Skip to main content
Log in

Change detection with texture segmentation and nonlinear filtering in optical remote sensing images

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Change detection is an important problem in the analysis of optical remote sensing images. The usual way of approaching this problem is by thresholding a difference image in order to obtain a detection mask, but the choice of this threshold is not always easy as the distribution of the values of changed and unchanged pixels may overlap. Therefore, an automatic detector can lead to a high number of false alarms. In this paper, we propose to improve this technique by designing a nonlinear filtering step that highlights the changes in the difference image. In order to better accomplish this process, a previous segmentation stage using texture information from the original images is required. This information can also be used to dismiss areas that do not contain changes with a high likelihood. We show that the process separates the distribution of values in the changed region from the unchanged region and make the choice of the threshold more robust. This results in a significantly lower error than obtaining the mask from the difference image without previous nonlinear filtering. The proposed technique has been used with success in the detection of new constructions on non-urban soil from very-high-resolution aerial images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh, A.: Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 10, 989–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruzzone, L., Prieto, D.: Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38, 1171–1182 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobolo, F., Bruzzone, L., Marconcini, M.: A novel approach to unsupervised change detection based on a semisupervised SVM and a similarity measure. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 46, 2070–2082 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Celik, T.: Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6, 772–776 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bovolo, F., Bruzzone, L.: A detail-preserving scale-driven approach to change detection in multitemporal SAR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43, 2963–2972 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Celik, T., Ma, K.: Unsupervised change detection for satellite images using dual-tree complex wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48, 1199–1210 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stringa, E.: Morphological change detection algorithms for surveillance applications. In: Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 1–10 (2000)

  8. Kasetkasem, T., Varshney, P.: An image change detection algorithm based on markov random field models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40, 1815–1823 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benedek, C., Sziranyi, T.: Change detection in optical aerial images by a multilayer conditional mixed Markov model. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47, 3416–3430 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dianat, R., Kasaei, S.: Change detection in optical remote sensing images using difference-based methods and spatial information. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 7, 215–219 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchiha, R., Besbes, K.: Comparison of local descriptors for automatic remote sensing image registration. Signal Image Video Processing, pp. 1–7 (2013)

  12. Xu, T., Gondra, I.: A simple and effective texture characterization for image segmentation. Signal Image Video Process. 6(2), 231–245 (2012)

  13. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vergara, L., Bernabeu, O.: Simple approach to nonlinear prediction. Electron. Lett. 37, 928–936 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Valencian Cartographic Institute under a research and development project and by the Generalitat Valenciana under Grant No. PROMETEO/2010/040.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Bosch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bosch, I., Serrano, A., Vergara, L. et al. Change detection with texture segmentation and nonlinear filtering in optical remote sensing images. SIViP 9, 1955–1963 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-014-0690-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-014-0690-z

Keywords

Navigation