Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrating remote sensing and image processing to test for disturbance effects in a post-hurricane mangrove ecosystem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use drone images of a post-hurricane mangrove in south-west Mexico to apply landscape segmentation and evaluate direct disturbance effects on forest cover and indirect effects on two closely related bird species. Hurricane Carlotta made landfall in June 2012. We obtained images at ten sites comprising two mangrove types in August 2015 and made standardised counts of Rufous-naped Wren and Banded Wren at these sites in 2011 and 2015. Superpixels were extracted from drone images using an energy-driven sampling algorithm. The attributes of a sub-sample of representative superpixels were encoded as classifier inputs for feature extraction, and supervised classification was then attained with a random decision forest. The scale of classified superpixels was congruent with micropatches in wren habitats. We used percentages derived from superpixel classes of live trees and dead wood to calculate post-hurricane fractional vegetation cover. We applied generalised linear mixed models to relate live tree cover to pre- and post-hurricane frequency indices for both wren species. White mangrove sites produced markedly higher fractional cover values than red mangrove sites. Whereas the Rufous-naped Wren was not associated with live tree cover, Banded Wren occupancy was higher in areas with greater cover. Segmentation methods combined with bird monitoring constitute a tool to analyse how faunal populations respond to or are impacted by hurricane-induced changes to wetland vegetation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin, A., Egnotovich, M., Ford, M., Platt, W.: Regeneration in fringe mangrove forests damaged by hurricane andrew. Plant Ecol. 157(2), 151–164 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blondel, J.: Point counts with unlimited distance. Stud. Avian Biol. 6, 414–420 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brander, L.M., Wagtendonk, A.J., Hussain, S.S., McVittie, A., Verburg, P.H., de Groot, R.S., van der Ploeg, S.: Ecosystem service values for mangroves in southeast asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosys. Serv. 1(1), 62–69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breithaupt, J.L., Hurst, N., Steinmuller, H.E., Duga, E., Smoak, J.M., Kominoski, J.S., Chambers, L.G.: Comparing the biogeochemistry of storm surge sediments and pre-storm soils in coastal wetlands: Hurricane Irma and the Florida everglades. Estuaries Coasts 43, 1090–1103 (2020)

  6. Chen, Y., Ming, D., Lv, X.: Superpixel based land cover classification of VHR satellite image combining multi-scale CNN and scale parameter estimation. Earth Sci. Inform. 12, 341–363 (2019)

  7. Clinton, N., Holt, A., Scarborough, J., Yan, L., Gong, P., et al.: Accuracy assessment measures for object-based image segmentation goodness. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 76(3), 289–299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crawley, M.: The R book. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Dittman, D.J., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Napolitano, A.: Is data sampling required when using random forest for classification on imbalanced bioinformatics data? In: Bouabana-Tebibel, T., Rubin, S. (eds.) Theoretical Information Reuse and Integration, pp. 157–171. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fierer, N., Kotler, B.: Evidence for micropatch partitioning and effects of boundaries on patch use in two species of gerbils. Funct. Ecol. 14(2), 176–182 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Flores-de Santiago, F., Kovacs, J.M., Flores-Verdugo, F.: Discrimination of 3 dominant mangrove species from the pacific coast of mexico by spectroscopy on intact leaves. Ciencias Marinas 44(3), 185–202 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forman, R.: Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions 1995. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallagher, B., Rever, M., Loveland, D., Mundhenk, T.N., Beauchamp, B., Robertson, E., Jaman, G.G., Hiszpanski, A.M., Han, T.Y.J.: Predicting compressive strength of consolidated molecular solids using computer vision and deep learning. Mater. Des. 190, 108541 (2020)

  14. Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L.L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J., Duke, N.: Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20(1), 154–159 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hao, S., Zhou, Y., Guo, Y.: A brief survey on semantic segmentation with deep learning. Neurocomputing 406, 302–321 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison, X.A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M.E., Evans, J., Fisher, D.N., Goodwin, C.E., Robinson, B.S., Hodgson, D.J., Inger, R.: A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6, e4794 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutto, R.L., Pletschet, S.M., Hendricks, P.: A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. The Auk 103(3), 593–602 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krauss, K.W., Osland, M.J.: Tropical cyclones and the organization of mangrove forests: a review. Ann. Bot. 125(2), 213–234 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mathur, P.: Machine Learning Applications Using Python: Cases Studies from Healthcare, Retail, and Finance. Apress, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maurya, A.K., Singh, D., Singh, K.: Development of fusion approach for estimation of vegetation fraction cover with drone and sentinel-2 data. In: IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 7448–7451. IEEE (2018)

  21. Northup, B., Dias, C., Brown, J., Skelly, W.: Micro-patch and community scale spatial distribution of herbaceous cover in a grazed eucalypt woodland. J. Arid Environ. 60(3), 509–530 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oyugi, J.O., Brown, J.S., Whelan, C.J.: Foraging behavior and coexistence of two sunbird species in a kenyan woodland. Biotropica 44(2), 262–269 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paneque-Gálvez, J., McCall, M., Napoletano, B., Wich, S., Koh, L.: Small drones for community-based forest monitoring: an assessment of their feasibility and potential in tropical areas. Forests 5(6), 1481–1507 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pasch, R., Zelinsky, D.: Tropical cyclone report hurricane carlotta 14–16 June 2012. National Hurricane Center (EP032012), pp 1–13 (2012)

  25. Roth, L.C.: Hurricanes and mangrove regeneration: effects of Hurricane Joan, October 1988, on the vegetation of Isla del Venado, Bluefields. Nicaragua. Biotropica 24, 375–384 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruiz, M.D., León-Cortés, J.L., Enríquez, P.L., García-Estrada, C., Salazar, J.L.R.: Habitat-use patterns among migrant and resident landbirds of contrasting dietary habits in a southern mexican wetland. Ardeola 66(2), 291–310 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruiz Bruce, M.D., Baños, J.C.: Estimating species richness and density of a bird community in a coastal lagoon on the mexican pacific. Huitzil Rev. Mex. Ornitol. 15(2), 64–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruwaimana, M., Satyanarayana, B., Otero, V., Muslim, A.M., Syafiq, M., Ibrahim, S., Raymaekers, D., Koedam, N., Dahdouh-Guebas, F.: The advantages of using drones over space-borne imagery in the mapping of mangrove forests. PloS One 13(7), e0200288 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoelynck, J., Creëlle, S., Buis, K., Mulder, T.D., Emsens, W.J., Hein, T., Meire, D., Meire, P., Okruszko, T., Preiner, S., Gonzalez, R.R., Silinski, A., Temmerman, S., Troch, P., Oyen, T.V., Verschoren, V., Visser, F., Wang, C., Wolters, J.W., Folkard, A.: What is a macrophyte patch? Patch identification in aquatic ecosystems and guidelines for consistent delineation. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 18(1), 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Serrano-Rubio, J., Everson, R.: Brain tumour segmentation method based on supervoxels and sparse dictionaries. In: International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pp. 210–221. Springer (2018)

  31. Serrano-Rubio, J., Ruiz Mateo, D., Vidal-Espitia, U.: Landscape image dataset (2020). https://sites.google.com/view/jpsr/projects/landscape-segmentation. Accessed 14 May 2020

  32. Smith III, T.J., Robblee, M.B., Wanless, H.R., Doyle, T.W.: Mangroves, hurricanes, and lightning strikes: assessment of hurricane andrew suggests an interaction across two differing scales of disturbance. BioScience 44(4), 256–262 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Temeles, E.J., Shaw, K.C., Kudla, A.U., Sander, S.E.: Traplining by purple-throated carib hummingbirds: behavioral responses to competition and nectar availability. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61(2), 163–172 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tossas, A.G.: Effects of hurricane Georges on the resident avifauna of Maricao State Forest, Puerto Rico (2006)

  35. Van den Bergh, M., Boix, X., Roig, G., de Capitani, B., Van Gool, L.: Seeds: superpixels extracted via energy-driven sampling. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 13–26. Springer (2012)

  36. Wang, L., Jia, M., Yin, D., Tian, J.: A review of remote sensing for mangrove forests: 1956–2018. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111223 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, L., Sousa, W., Gong, P.: Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with ikonos imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25(24), 5655–5668 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, M., Liu, X., Gao, Y., Ma, X., Soomro, N.Q.: Superpixel segmentation: a benchmark. Signal Process. Image Commun. 56, 28–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiley, J.W., Wunderle, J.M.: The effects of hurricanes on birds, with special reference to Caribbean islands. Bird Conserv. Int. 3(4), 319–349 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank the Science and Technology Council of Mexico, CONACyT, for its financial support throughout the project CB-2015/256126. Sincere thanks are extended to Luis Oscar Rios for providing all photography equipment and piloting the drone. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Technologies Laboratory, Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Irapuato, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico

    Juan Pablo Serrano-Rubio & Ulises Vidal-Espitia

  2. The Barn Owl Trust, Ashburton, Devon, UK

    Mateo D. M. Ruiz

Authors
  1. Juan Pablo Serrano-Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mateo D. M. Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulises Vidal-Espitia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mateo D. M. Ruiz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano-Rubio, J.P., Ruiz, M.D.M. & Vidal-Espitia, U. Integrating remote sensing and image processing to test for disturbance effects in a post-hurricane mangrove ecosystem. SIViP 15, 351–359 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-020-01754-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-020-01754-9

Keywords