Skip to main content
Log in

M.R. brain tumor classification employing ICA and kernel-based support vector machine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A revolutionary and robust magnetic resonance (MR) brain tumor detection and segmentation approach has been presented in this work. We have put forward a robust technique to extract the tumor and classify the same as benign or malignant. The extraction of features from detected lesions is achieved through usage of wavelet transform. There is an immediate need to eliminate the redundant features from extracted subset because they degrade the performance of classification. Now, these reduced features are fed to kernel-based SVM (K-SVM). The kernel that is being utilized in this framework is Gaussian radial basis as it is quite efficient. Once the MR images are classified as benign or malignant, the next obvious step is to segment out the infected portion. We have relied upon region growing technique for the segmentation of the infected area. K-fold cross-validation approach has been adopted to optimize the performance K-SVM. We have compared the outcomes of our approach to that of various in-class conventional approaches. Experimental outcomes clearly suggest that our approach has performed efficiently and robustly for almost entire set of data and has performed way better when compared to existing in-class methodologies both qualitatively as well as quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. The magnetic resonance images used in this study are public databases that are cited within the text

References

  1. Lenvine, M., Shaheen, S.: A modular computer vision system for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 3(5), 540–557 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balasubramanian, C., Saravanan, S., Srinivasagan, K.G., Duraiswamy, K.: Automatic segmentation of brain tumor from MR image using region growing technique. Life Sci. J. 10(2), 2878–2883 (2013)

  3. Yamasaki, T., Chen, T., Yagi, M., Hirai, T., Murakami, R.: GrowCut-based fast tumor segmentation for 3D magnetic resonance images. Med. Imaging Image Process. 8314, 831434 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Selvakumar, J., Lakshmi, A., Arivoli, T.: Brain tumor segmentation and its area calculation in brain MR images using K-mean clustering and Fuzzy C-mean algorithm. In: IEEE-International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM), pp. 186–190 (2012)

  5. Clarke, L.P., Velthuizen, R.P., Camacho, M.A., Heine, J.J., Vaidyanathan, M., Hall, L.O., Thatcher, R.W., Silbiger, M.L.: MRI segmentation: methods and applications. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13(3), 343–368 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fathima, M.M., Manimegalai, D., Thaiyalnayaki, S.: Automatic detection of tumor subtype in mammograms based On GLCM and DWT features using SVM. In: International Conference on Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES), pp. 809–813 (2013)

  7. Bauer, S., Nolte, L.P., Reyes, M.: Fully automatic segmentation of brain tumor images using support vector machine classification in combination with hierarchical conditional random field regularization. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 354–361 (2011)

  8. Suk, H.I., Shen, D.: Deep learning-based feature representation for AD/MCI classification. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 583–590 (2013)

  9. Suk, H.I., Lee, S.W., Shen, D.: Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage 101, 569–582 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaplot, S., Patnaik, L.M., Jagannathan, N.R.: Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 1(1), 86–92 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cocosco, C.A., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med. Image Anal. 7(4), 513–527 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Acevedo-Rodríguez, J., Maldonado-Bascon, S., Lafuente-Arroyo, S., Siegmann, P., López-Ferreras, F.: Computational load reduction in decision functions using support vector machines. Sig. Process. 89(10), 2066–2071 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. http://med.harvard.edu/AANLIB/

  14. http://www.oasis-brains.org

  15. http://loni.usc.edu/research/atlases

  16. El-Dahshan, E.S.A., Hosny, T., Salem, A.B.M.: Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification. Digit. Signal Proc. 20(2), 433–441 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Comon, P.: Independent component analysis, a new concept. Signal Process. 36(3), 287–314 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyvärinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 13(4–5), 411–430 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., Oja, E.: Independent Component Analysis, Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control, vol. 1, pp. 11–14. Wiley, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson, K.: The error law and its generalizations by Fechner and Pearson. A Rejoinder. Biometrika 4(1/2), 169–212 (1905)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, W., Xu, Z., Lu, W., Zhang, X.: Determination of the spread parameter in the Gaussian kernel for classification and regression. Neurocomputing 55(3–4), 643–663 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, Z., Dai, M., Meng, D.: Fast and efficient strategies for model selection of Gaussian support vector machine. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybernetics) 39(5), 1292–1307 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan, S.F., Chu, F.L.: Support vector machines-based fault diagnosis for turbo-pump rotor. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20(4), 939–952 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qu, J., Liu, Z., Zuo, M.J., Huang, H.Z.: Feature selection for damage degree classification of planetary gearboxes using support vector machine. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 225(9), 2250–2264 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahadevan, S., Shah, S.L.: Fault detection and diagnosis in process data using one-class support vector machines. J. Process Control 19(10), 1627–1639 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Konar, P., Chattopadhyay, P.: Bearing fault detection of induction motor using wavelet and support vector machines (SVMs). Appl. Soft Comput. 11(6), 4203–4211 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez, R.C.: Digital Image Processing, pp. 531-534 (2009)

  28. Braga-Neto, U.M., Dougherty, E.R.: Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification? Bioinformatics 20(3), 374–380 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Isaksson, A., Wallman, M., Goransson, H., Gustafsson, M.G.: Cross-validation and bootstrapping are unreliable in small sample classification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29(14), 1960–1965 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, J.H.: Estimating classification error rate: repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53(11), 3735–3745 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Nyul, L.G., Udupa, J.K.: Standardizing the MR image intensity scales: making MR intensities have tissue-specific meaning. Med. Imaging 3976, 496–504 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 234–241 (2015)

  33. Sudre, C.H., Li, W., Vercauteren, T., Ourselin, S., Cardoso, M.J.: Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations. In: Deep learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, pp. 240–248 (2017)

  34. Bertels, J., Eelbode, T., Berman, M., Vandermeulen, D., Maes, F., Bisschops, R., Blaschko, M.B.: Optimizing the Dice score and Jaccard index for medical image segmentation: theory and practice. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 92–100 (2019)

  35. Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V.F., Simpson, J.P., Kane, A.D., Menon, D.K., Rueckert, D., Glocker, B.: Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 36, 61–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, Y.D., Wang, S., Wu, L.: A novel method for magnetic resonance brain image classification based on adaptive chaotic PSO. Progress Electromag. Res. 109, 325–343 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., Vining, G.G.: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, vol. 821. Wiley, New York (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Cramer, J.S.: The origins of logistic regression, 119(4) (2002)

  39. Jahromi, A.H., Taheri, M.: A non-parametric mixture of Gaussian naive Bayes classifiers based on local independent features. In: Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing Conference (AISP), pp. 209–212 (2017)

  40. Safavian, S.R., Landgrebe, D.: A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 21(3), 660–674 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zacharaki, E.I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Yoo, D.S., Wolf, R., Melhem, E.R., Davatzikos, C.: MRI-based classification of brain tumor type and grade using SVM-RFE. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 1035–1038 (2009)

  43. Zhan, Y., Shen, D.: Design efficient support vector machine for fast classification. Pattern Recogn. 38(1), 157–161 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang, Y., Jin, B., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y.Q.: Granular support vector machines for medical binary classification problems. In: Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, pp. 73–78 (2004)

  45. Nazir, M., Wahid, F., Ali Khan, S.: A simple and intelligent approach for brain MRI classification. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(3), 1127–1135 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahman, M.A., Hossain, E., Hasan, M., Hassan, S.Z., Azmi, T.H. and Parvez, M.Z.: Deep learning based binary classification for Alzheimer’s disease detection using brain MRI images. In: IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (2020)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, R., Goel, A. & Raghuvanshi, D.K. M.R. brain tumor classification employing ICA and kernel-based support vector machine. SIViP 15, 501–510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-020-01770-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-020-01770-9

Keywords

Navigation