Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SAR image classification post-processing with multiscale complementary Gaussian kernel weighting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classification errors may occur both in pixel- and spatial-based classification methods at the pixel level for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. In this study, a classification post-processing method is proposed by utilizing complementary Gaussian kernel weighting (CGKW) for regularization of classification errors on the classified SAR images. To demonstrate the validity of the proposed method, the uniform kernel weighting (UKW), the Gaussian kernel weighting (GKW), Markov random fields (MRF) and total variation-L1 (TV) methods are also presented for comparison purposes. The proposed approach is a combination of filtering- and relearning-based classification post-processing method that can be applied to SAR images. In the proposed framework, class probabilities for every pixel are initially obtained by a convolutional neural network. Afterward, classification results are updated again using the selected weighted averaging method and neighboring classification probabilities, and then, the results of UKW, GKW, CGKW, MRF and TV are compared. Experimental results prove that the proposed CGKW method improves the final classification accuracy better than other comparison methods, and the resulting classification difference between the UKW, GKW, MRF and TV methods is statistically significant according to McNemar’s statistical significance test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moreira, A., Prats-Iraola, P., Younis, M., Krieger, G., Hajnsek, I., Papathanassiou, K.P.: A tutorial on synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 1(1), 6–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Argenti, F., Lapini, A., Bianchi, T., Alparone, L.: A tutorial on speckle reduction in synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 1(3), 6–35 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin, Y.-Q., Feng, X.: Polarimetric Scattering and SAR Information Retrieval. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Lohse, J., Doulgeris, A.P., Dierking, W.: An optimal decision-tree design strategy and its application to sea ice classification from SAR imagery. Remote Sens. 11(13), 1574 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banks, S., White, L., Behnamian, A., Chen, Z., Montpetit, B., Brisco, B., Pasher, J., Duffe, J.: Wetland classification with multi-angle/temporal SAR using random forests. Remote Sens. 11(6), 670 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J., Song, H., Zhou, B.: SAR target classification based on deep forest model. Remote Sens. 12(1), 128 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L., Wang, X., Zou, B.: Selective ensemble learning and its applications in fully polarimetric SAR image classification. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 13(3), 034509 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Addabbo, P., Biondi, F., Clemente, C., Orlando, D., Pallotta, L.: Classification of covariance matrix eigenvalues in polarimetric SAR for environmental monitoring applications. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 34(6), 28–43 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, C., Li, H., Liao, W., Philips, W., Emery, W.: Variational textured Dirichlet process mixture model with pairwise constraint for unsupervised classification of polarimetric SAR images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 28(8), 4145–4160 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, Y., Jiao, L., Liu, F., Yang, S., Wu, Q., Sanga, G.: Fast DDL classification for SAR images with \(l_{1,\infty }\) constraint. IEEE Access 7, 68991–69006 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren, H., Yu, X., Zou, L., Zhou, Y., Wang, X.: Joint supervised dictionary and classifier learning for multi-view SAR image classification. IEEE Access 7, 165127–165142 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bengio, Y., Courville, A.C., Vincent, P.: Unsupervised feature learning and deep learning: a review and new perspectives. CoRR (2012). arXiv:1206.5538

  13. Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.-W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18(7), 1527–1554 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Aydemir, M.S., Bilgin, G.: Semisupervised hyperspectral image classification using deep features. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 12(9), 3615–3622 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’12, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)

  16. Ahishali, M., Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., Gabbouj, M.: Dual and single polarized SAR image classification using compact convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 11(11), 1340 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, A., Xuezhi Yang, L., Jia, J.A., Dong, Z.: SAR image classification using adaptive neighborhood-based convolutional neural network. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 52(1), 178–193 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rostami, M., Kolouri, S., Eaton, E., Kim, K.: Deep transfer learning for few-shot SAR image classification. Remote Sens. 11(11), 1374 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, J., Hou, B., Jiao, L., Wang, S.: POL-SAR image classification based on modified stacked autoencoder network and data distribution. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 58(3), 1678–1695 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solaiman, B., Koffi, R.K., Mouchot, M., Hillion, A.: An information fusion method for multispectral image classification postprocessing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 36(2), 395–406 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schindler, K.: An overview and comparison of smooth labeling methods for land-cover classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50(11), 4534–4545 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, S., Qi, Z., Li, X., Gar-On Yeh, A.: Integration of convolutional neural networks and object-based post-classification refinement for land use and land cover mapping with optical and SAR data. Remote Sens. 11(6), 690 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, X., Lu, Q., Zhang, L., Plaza, A.: New postprocessing methods for remote sensing image classification: a systematic study. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(11), 7140–7159 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stuckens, J., Coppin, P.R., Bauer, M.E.: Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 71(3), 282–296 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benz, U.C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., Heynen, M.: Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 58(3–4), 239–258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wan, L., Xiang, Y., You, H.: A post-classification comparison method for SAR and optical images change detection. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 16(7), 1026–1030 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Geman, S., Geman, D.: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6(6), 721–741 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khorram, S., Nelson, S., Cakir, H., Van Der Wiele, C.: Digital Image Processing: Post-processing and Data Integration, pp. 839–864. Springer, New York, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhi, Z., Shi, B., Sun, Y.: Primal–dual method to smoothing TV-based model for image denoising. J. Algorithms Comput. Technol. 10(4), 235–243 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Peijun, D., Samat, A., Waske, B., Liu, S., Li, Z.: Random forest and rotation forest for fully polarized SAR image classification using polarimetric and spatial features. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 105, 38–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, J.-S., Grunes, M.R., Pottier, E.: Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 39(11), 2343–2351 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Yildiz Technical University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department, under Project No. 2014-04-01-KAP01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Yildiz Technical University (YTU), 34220, Istanbul, Turkey

    Unsal Gokdag & Gokhan Bilgin

  2. Signal and Image Processing Lab. (SIMPLAB) in YTU, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey

    Unsal Gokdag & Gokhan Bilgin

Authors
  1. Unsal Gokdag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gokhan Bilgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokhan Bilgin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gokdag, U., Bilgin, G. SAR image classification post-processing with multiscale complementary Gaussian kernel weighting. SIViP 15, 1425–1433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-01874-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-01874-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation