Skip to main content
Log in

Edge coherence-weighted second-order variational model for image denoising

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-order variational models have the ability to remove the staircase effect generated by the total variation regularizer. They, however, tend to blur object edges. To overcome this drawback, we introduce an edge coherence-weighted second-order (ECSO) model for image denoising. We propose novel regularizers that use the edge coherence quantity to adjust the strength of regularization according to the characteristics of each pixel. We then adapt the split Bregman algorithm to solve the proposed model. All the subproblems are solved efficiently using the fast Fourier transform and the shrinkage operator. Extensive experiments show that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art high-order variational models for image denoising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goyal, B., et al.: Image denoising review: From classical to state-of-the-art approaches. Inf. Fusion. 55, 220–244 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudin, L., et al.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Papafitsoros, K., Schönlieb, C.: A combined first and second order variational approach for image reconstruction. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 48(2), 308–338 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Duan, J., et al.: An edge-weighted second order variational model for image decomposition. Digit. Signal Process. 49, 162–181 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, X., et al.: Variational total curvature model for multiplicative noise removal. IET Comput. Vis. 12(4), 542–552 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhai, Y., et al.: Two variational models for image denoising using Jacobian of Normals. IEEE Access. 9, 43301–43315 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambolle, A., Lions, P.: Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems. Numer. Math. 76(2), 167–188 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh, P., et al.: A regularization model with adaptive diffusivity for variational image denoising. Signal Process. 149, 214–228 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Phan, K., Tran, Y.: A space-variant nonlinear algorithm for denoising omnidirectional images corrupted by Poisson noise. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 27, 535–539 (2020)

  10. Belyaev, A., Fayolle, P.: Adaptive curvature-guided image filtering for structure+ texture image decomposition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(10), 5192–5203 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Phan, K.: A weighted total variation based image denoising model using mean curvature. Optik 217, 164940 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, M., Li, B.: A novel weighted anisotropic total variational model for image applications. Signal Image Video Process. 16, 211–218 (2021)

  13. Thanh, D., et al.: An adaptive method for image restoration based on high-order total variation and inverse gradient. SIViP 14(6), 1189–1197 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, J., et al.: A novel variational model for image decomposition. SIViP 13(5), 967–974 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pham, C.T., et al.: An adaptive algorithm for restoring image corrupted by mixed noise. Cybern. Phys. 8(2), 73–82 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. Alvey Vis. Conf. 15(50), 147–152 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstein, T., Osher, S.: The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 2(2), 323–343 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth, S., Black, M.J.: Fields of experts: a framework for learning image priors. Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recogn. 2, 860–867 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lebrun, M., et al.: The noise clinic: a blind image denoising algorithm. Image Process. Line 5, 1–54 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Setiadi, D.I.M.: PSNR vs SSIM: imperceptibility quality assessment for image steganography. Multimed. Tools Appl. 80, 8423–8444 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Getreuer, P.: Rudin–Osher–Fatemi total variation denoising using split Bregman. Image Process. Line 2, 74–95 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tran Dang Khoa Phan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phan, T.D.K., Tran, T.H.Y. Edge coherence-weighted second-order variational model for image denoising. SIViP 16, 2313–2320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02209-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02209-z

Keywords

Navigation