Skip to main content
Log in

Triple-order statistics-based CFAR detection for heterogeneous Pareto type I background

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For non-stationary radar returns, constant false alarm rate (CFAR) schemes are derived to maintain the probability of false alarm in its desired value. Non-coherent CFAR processes based upon scale and power-invariant distributions for sea clutter received a lot of attention and it is still an open research area in radar target detection. In this context, a novel CFAR detector-labeled WHOS-CFAR (Weber–Haykin-Order Statistics) is proposed in this paper for a Pareto type I sea clutter. The decision rule is given in terms of three ranked samples allowing full CFAR properties with respect to clutter shape and scale parameters. Through Monte-Carlo simulations, the detection performances are illustrated with and without interfering targets. It is shown that the WHOS-CFAR keeps almost the CFAR property compared to existing logt- WH-, GMOS- (Geometric Mean-Order Statistic), TMOS-(Trimmed Mean-Order Statistic) and IE (Inclusion/Exclusion)-CFAR detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu, W., Liu, J., Hao, C., Gao, Y., Liang, W.Y.: Multichannel adaptive signal detection: Basic theory and literature review. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65(2), 121301 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbasi, A.R., Mahmoudi, M.R., Arefi, M.M.: Transformer winding faults detection based on time series analysis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–10 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton, D.K.: Radar Clutter. Artech House, Third printing, Washington, USA (1983)

  4. Anastassopoulos, V., Lampropoulos, G.A., Drosopoulos, A., Rey, M.: High resolution radar clutter statistics. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electr. Syst. 35(1), 43–60 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bocquet, S., Rosenberg, L., Gierull, C.H.: Parameter estimation for a compound radar clutter model with trimodal discrete texture. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 58(10), 7062–7073 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gouri, A., Mezache, A., Oudira, H.: Radar CFAR detection in Weibull clutter based on zlog(z) estimator. Remote Sens. Lett. 11(6), 581–589 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakubiak, A.: False-alarm probabilities for a Log-t detector in K-distributed clutter. Electron. Lett. 19(18), 725–726 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinberg, G.V.: On the construction of CFAR decision rules via transformations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55(2), 40–1146 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein, G.B.: False-alarm regulation in log- normal and Weibull clutter. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electr. Syst. AES-9(1), 84–92 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, P., Haykin, S.: Ordered statistic CFAR processing for two-parameter distributions with variable Skewness. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electr. Syst. 21(6), 819–821 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravid, R., Levanon, N.: Maximum-likelihood CFAR for Weibull background. IEE Proc. F 139(3), 256–264 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberg, G.V., Bateman, L., Hayden, P.: Development of non-coherent CFAR detction processes in Weibull background. Digit. Signal Process. 75, 96–106 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bentoumi, A., Mezache, A.: Performance of non-parametric CFAR detectors in log-normal and K Radar clutter. In 3rd International Conference on Electrical Sciences and Technologies in Maghreb (CISTEM), 28–31 October, Algiers, Algeria, (2018)

  14. Weinberg, G.V., Kyprianou, R.: Optimized binary integration with order statistic CFAR in Pareto distributed Clutter. Digit. Signal Process. 42, 50–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberg, G.V.: Assessing the pareto fit to high resolution high grazing angle sea clutter. Electron. Lett. 47(8), 516–517 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberg, G.V.: Constant false alarm rate detectors for Pareto clutter models. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 7(2), 153–163 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg, G.V., Alexopoulos, A.: Analysis of a dual order statistic constant false alarm rate detector. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 52(5), 2567–2574 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinberg, G.V., Glenny, V.G.: Enhancing Goldstein’s Log-t detector in pareto distributed clutter. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 53(2), 1035–1044 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinberg, G.V.: Trimmed geometric mean order statistic CFAR detector for Pareto distributed clutter. SIViP 12(4), 651–657 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiaqiu, A., Xuezhi, Y., Jitao, S., Zhangyu, D., Lu, J., Fang, Z.: An adaptively-truncated clutter-statistics-based two parameter CFAR detector in SAR imagery. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 43(1), 267–279 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiaqui, A., Yuxiang, M., Qiwu, L., Mengdao, X., Kai, J., Lu, J., Xingming, Y.: Robust CFAR ship detector based on bilateral-trimmed-statistics of complex ocean scenes in SAR imagery: a closed-form solution. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electr. Syst. 57(3), 1872–1890 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakker, R.B., Currie, B.: The McMaster IPIX Radar Sea Clutter Database. [Online] Available: http://soma.crl.mcmaster.ca/ipix/ (2020)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Zebiri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zebiri, K., Mezache, A. Triple-order statistics-based CFAR detection for heterogeneous Pareto type I background. SIViP 17, 1105–1111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02317-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02317-w

Keywords

Navigation