Skip to main content
Log in

Time-space modeling of receiver ghost in the native acquisition coordinates: a step toward a non-Fourier-based deghosting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide a new theoretical contribution to the geophysical signal processing on how the ghost operator can be approximately analytically modeled. We derive a time-space-domain receiver ghost modeling operator for a wavefront traveling under a flat sea surface. The operator can be used to model the ghost wavefront on the native acquisition geometry without going into the temporal or spatial Fourier domain. We demonstrate the ghost operator with a multivariate generalization of the Gaussian function in conjunction with a hyperbolic traveltime function and compared it with modeled Green’s functions. This multivariate special function was specifically conceived for seismic data decomposition and promotes the signal cone of the data. Its composition with the hyperbolic traveltime function also ensures signal cone preservation and stable ghost operator computation. The ghost model derived is valid independent of streamer depth, i.e., for shallow as well as deep towed-streamer geometry, and it can also be extended to the source ghost. The proposed method, when combined with an appropriate data decomposition approach, provides a step toward developing deghosting algorithms in the native acquisition geometry with minimal user-defined parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

References

  1. Amundsen, L.: Wavenumber-based filtering of marine point-source data. Geophysics 58, 1335–1348 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caprioli, P., Roth, J., Rickett, J., Vassallo, M.: Joint adaptive deghosting and designature. In: 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp. 1–5 (2019)

  3. Engquist, B., Zhao, H.: Approximate separability of the Green’s function of the Helmholtz equation in the high frequency limit. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 71, 2220–2274 (2018)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfand, I., Shilov, G.: Generalized Functions: Properties and operations, by IM Gel’fand and GE Shilov, translated by E. Saletan. Academic Press, Cambridge (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olver, F.W., Lozier, D.W., Boisvert, R.F., Clark, C.W.: NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions Hardback and CD-ROM. Cambridge university press, Cambridge (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Özdemir, A.K., Caprioli, P., Özbek, A., Kragh, E., Robertsson, J.O.: Optimized deghosting of over/under towed-streamer data in the presence of noise. Lead. Edge 27, 190–199 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Posthumus, B.J.: Deghosting using a twin streamer configuration. Geophys. Prospect. 41, 267–286 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rickett, J.: Successes and challenges in 3d interpolation and deghosting of single-component marine-streamer data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 3599–3604 (2014)

  9. Rickett, J., van Manen, D., Loganathan, P., Seymour, N.: Slanted-streamer data-adaptive deghosting with local plane waves: Presented at the 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014 (2014)

  10. Sønneland, L., Berg, L.E., Eidsvig, P., Haugen, A., Fotland, B., Vestby, J.: 2-d deghosting using vertical receiver arrays. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1986. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 516–519 (1986)

  11. Yarman, C.E., Kumar, R., Rickett, J.: A model-based data-driven dictionary learning for seismic data representation. Geophys. Prospect. 66, 98–123 (2017)

  12. Yarman, E., Ramírez, A.C.: Directional wavefield decomposition. Geophysics 78, WA71–WA76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank James Rickett and Kemal Øzdemir for fruitful discussions. We thank Schlumberger for permitting to publish this work.

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author contributed to the study conception and design.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Can Evren Yarman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Declarations The authors read and understood the publishing policy and submit this manuscript in accordance with this policy. The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper. The results/data/figures in this manuscript have not been published elsewhere, nor are they under consideration by another publisher. The corresponding author has read the Springer journal policies on author responsibilities and submits this manuscript in accordance with those policies. All of the material is owned by the authors and/or no permissions are required.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yarman, C.E. Time-space modeling of receiver ghost in the native acquisition coordinates: a step toward a non-Fourier-based deghosting. SIViP 17, 1661–1667 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02376-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02376-z

Keywords

Navigation