Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective cooperative control based on evolutionary process optimization of immune algorithm

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Service Oriented Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on evolutionary process optimization immune evolution algorithm, a multi-balloon cooperative control strategy is proposed, which targets at the problem that an artificial immune algorithm is apt to turn premature hastily when solving multi-objective problems. First, the control model of the multi-balloon robot is transformed into a multi-objective optimization problem, and an artificial immune algorithm is used to map and control, then Gaussian perturbation is added to the cloning behavior in the evolution process to ensure that there is a difference in each progeny after cloning. Weighting the most concentrated solution of the variation results, so that the scope of the solution is more diversified. Finally, the extinction mutations are performed on the extinct antibodies, which reduce the probability of antibody death and further maintains the diversity of the population. The simulation results show that compared with the standard support vector machine,the least squares support vector machine method and the standard artificial immune algorithm, the optimization result of the improved algorithm proposed in this paper is better in the solution of multi-objective optimization problem and the effect of the multi-balloon synergy control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kajita S, Cisneros R, Benallegue M, Sakaguchi T (2016) Impact acceleration of falling humanoid robot with an airbag. IEEE-RAS Int Conf Humanoid Robots 30:637–643

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang JB, Fang YY, Tong X, Zhang S, Fei YQ (2018) Design and Locomotion properties of a multi-airbag bionic soft robot. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 52(1):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weitschat R, Vogel J, Lantermann S, Hoppner H (2017) End-effector airbags to accelerate human-robot collaboration. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 11(8):2279–2284

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khosraviani M, Jahanshahi M, Farahani M, Bidaki ARZ (2018) Load–frequency control using multi-objective genetic algorithm and hybrid sliding mode control-based SMES. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):280–294

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Boukadida W, Benamor A, Messaoud H (2019) Multi-objective design of optimal sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of SCARA robot based on genetic algorithm. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 141(3):2887–2895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh K, Singh K, Son LH, Aziz A (2018) Congestion control in wireless sensor networks by hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm. Comput Netw 138:90–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yegireddy NK, Panda S, Papinaidu T, Yadav KPK (2018) Multi-objective non dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II optimized PID controller for automatic voltage regulator systems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(5):4971–4975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Araújo RDB, Coelho AAR (2017) Filtered predictive control design using multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for handling offset in chemical processes. Chem Eng Res Des 117:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tavana M, Li ZJ, Mobin M (2016) Multi-objective control chart design optimization using NSGA-III and MOPSO enhanced with DEA and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 50:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon J, Lee J (2017) Altitude and roll control of a hovering quad-rotor air vehicle using the multi-objective approximate optimization of proportional–integral–differential control. Eng Optim 49(10):1704–1718

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Dong HB, Lohse N, Petrovic S (2016) A multi-objective genetic algorithm for optimization of energy consumption and shop floor production performance. Int J Prod Econ 179:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saad A, Khan SA, Mahmood A (2018) A multi-objective evolutionary artificial bee colony algorithm for optimizing network topology design. Swarm Evolut Comput 38:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez AC, Del SJ, Camacho D (2019) Weighted strategies to guide a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-UAV mission planning. Swarm Evolut Comput 44:480–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang ZP, Wang XY, Lin QZ, Chen F, Chen JY (2018) A novel multi-objective co-evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition approach. Appl Soft Comput J 73:50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madiouni R, Bouallègue S, Haggège J, Siarry P (2016) Robust RST control design based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization approach. Int J Control Autom Syst 14(6):1607–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu FJ, Tu C (2017) An optimization model for target tracking of mobile sensor network based on motion state prediction in emerging sensor networks. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(5):3509–3524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trivedi V, Prakash S, Ramteke M (2017) Optimized on-line control of MMA polymerization using fast multi-objective DE. Mater Manuf Process 32(10):1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang ZJ, Xu XF (2012) A sharing-oriented service selection and scheduling approach for the optimization of resource utilization. SOCA 6(1):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu FJ, Lin JW, Gu HJ (2019) Dynamic linear predictive optimization of flexible robot profiling MFA model. J Sens 2019:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zamani AA, Tavakoli S, Etedali S (2017) Fractional order PID control design for semi-active control of smart base-isolated structures: a multi-objective cuckoo search approach. ISA Trans 67:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu FJ, Wu G (2020) Distributed error correction of EKF algorithm in multi-sensor fusion localization model. IEEE Access 8:93211–93218. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51675490, 81 911530751), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant Nos. LGG20F020015, LGG18F010007), and Young Academic Team Project of Zhejiang Shuren University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Technology, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    FengJun Hu & HeXin Lv

  2. United Institute of Informatics Problems, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus

    Alexander V. Tuzikov

Authors
  1. FengJun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. HeXin Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander V. Tuzikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to FengJun Hu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, F., Lv, H. & Tuzikov, A.V. Multi-objective cooperative control based on evolutionary process optimization of immune algorithm. SOCA 14, 153–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-020-00295-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-020-00295-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation