Skip to main content
Log in

Implicational Partial Galois Logics: Relational Semantics

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implicational tonoid logics and their relational semantics have been introduced by Yang and Dunn. This paper extends this investigation to implicational partial Galois logics. For this, we first define some implicational partial gaggle logics as special kinds of implicational tonoid logics called “implicational partial Galois logics.” Next, we provide Routley–Meyer-style relational semantics for finitary those logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use “\(\varphi \dashv \vdash \psi \)” as shorthand for \(\varphi \vdash \psi \) and \(\psi \vdash \varphi \).

  2. To understand the conditions 1) and 2) in each (1) and (2) using the notations “\(+\),” “−”, and “±,” see the indices of (\(p_{GC^{{\mathcal {A}}}}\)), (\(p_{dGC^{{\mathcal {A}}}}\)), (\(p_{RC^{{\mathcal {A}}}}\)), and (\(p_{dRC^{{\mathcal {A}}}}\)) in Sect. 4.1.

  3. To understand the conditions 1) and 2) using the notations “\(+\),” “−”, and “±,” see the indices of (\(p_{RES^{{\mathcal {A}}}}\)) in Sect. 4.2.

  4. Note that in (\(\sharp ^{n}_{\Diamond +}\)) the index ‘\((\pm )\)’ of \(\sharp \) ambiguously denotes one of isotonicity \(+\) and antitonicity − of all the argument places of \(\sharp \) excepting its i-th one and the notation ‘\(\Vvdash \)’ ambiguously denotes one of their corresponding forcing \(\Vdash \) and non-forcing \(\not \Vdash \). Similarly for (\(\sharp ^{n}_{\Diamond -}\)), (\(\sharp ^{n}_{\Box +}\)), and (\(\sharp ^{n}_{\Box -}\)).

  5. We assume that the canonical relations \(R^{can}\)’s also preserve labeling and tonicity maps, i.e., \(R^{can}_{\Rightarrow }\) and \(R^{can}_{\sharp }\)’s preserve the labels and tonicities of the connectives \(\Rightarrow \) and \(\sharp \)’s given by the labeling and tonicity maps of the logic.

References

  1. Bimbó, K., Dunn, J.M.: Generalized Galois Logics: Relational Semantics of Nonclassical Logical Calculi. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cintula, P.: Weakly Implicative (Fuzzy) Logics I: Basic properties. Arch. Math. Log. 45, 673–704 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cintula, P., Noguera, C.: A general framework for mathematical fuzzy logic. In: Cintula, P., Hájek, P., Noguera, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic. vol 1, pp. 103–207. College Publications, London (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn, J.M.: Gaggle theory, an abstraction of galois connections and residuation, with applications to negation, implication, and various logical operators. In: Van Eijck, J. (ed.) Logics in AI (JELIA 1990, Amsterdam), Lecture Notes in AI, pp. 31–51. Springer, Berlin (1991)

  5. Dunn, J.M.: Partial gaggles applied to logics with restricted structural rules. In: Schroeder-Heister, P., Do\(\check{s}\)en, K. (eds.) Substructural Logics, pp. 63–108. Clarendon, Oxford (1993)

  6. Dunn, J.M., Hardegree, G.: Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Galatos, N., Jipsen, P., Kowalski, T., Ono, H.: Residuated Lattices: An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, E., Dunn, J.M.: Implicational tonoid logics: algebraic and relational semantics. Log. Univ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-021-00288-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I dedicate this manuscript to the late J. Michael Dunn. Actually, it was completed together with the paper “Implicational tonoid logics.” When we submitted the latter one, we planed to submit the former one to a journal after the acceptance of our latter paper. Since this latter one has been accepted for publication in this journal, I submit the former manuscript to the same journal in honor of Mike and the acceptance in the journal Logica Universalis. We wish to acknowledge the helpful comments we received from Katalin Bimbó and Petr Cintula, which certainly improved our paper. The authors also thank Jeonbuk National University and Indiana University for supporting our joint work during the first author’s sabbatical visit. This work (Yang) was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A2A01034874).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunsuk Yang.

Additional information

To Hyunjung and Sally.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Deceased: J. Michael Dunn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, E., Dunn, J.M. Implicational Partial Galois Logics: Relational Semantics. Log. Univers. 15, 457–476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-021-00290-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-021-00290-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification