Abstract
This paper addresses an important multi-disciplinary issue of current interest, that is, the implications of technological design for fairness. A visual, graphical methodology centered on the Taylor-Russell diagram is proposed to address this issue. The Taylor-Russell diagram helps to identify and explore ways in which predictions built into designs can pit the interests of different constituencies against one another. The configuration of the design represents a trade-off between the interests of the communities involved. Whether or not the trade-off is appropriate constitutes a problem of fairness or distributive justice. The breadth of this methodology is supported by a diversity of examples analyzed. These include a surveillance system, an automotive safety system, a civic information system, and the international food distribution system. These examples provide models for application of the methodology to the analysis of designs in further areas of concern. Limitations of the methodology are also discussed. While it helps to identify and clarify issues of fairness in technology design, the methodology does not provide a general theory of fairness, nor can it provide fair solutions to such issues without appeal to further principles or concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean ethics. (D. Ross, J. L. Ackrill, and J. O. Urmson, Trans.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CBC News. (2009). Meat recall timeline. Retrieved 2009 from CBC News: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/08/26/f-meat-recall-timeline.html.
Cha, A. E., & McCrummen, S. (2008). Financial meltdown worsens food crisis. Retrieved 2009, from Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/25/AR2008102502293.html.
Cribb, J. (2010). The coming famine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Faiola, A. (2008). The new economics of hunger. Retrieved 2009, from the Washington post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/04/26/ST2008042602333.html.
Genova, G. (2009). No place to play: Current employee privacy rights in social networking sites. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 97–101.
Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2008). Psychological testing: Principles, Applications and Issues (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Kidd, K. (2009). Why we drive like idiots. Retrieved 2009 from Toronto Star: http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/635489.
Lawrence, F. (2004). Not on the label: What really goes into the food on your plate. London: Penguin.
Little, R. G. (2006). Organizational culture and the performance of critical infrastructure: Modeling and simulation in socio-technological systems. The 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’05) 2 (pp. 63–70). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Little, R. G., & Weaver, E. A. (2005). Protection from extreme events: using a socio-technological approach to evaluate policy options. Internation Journal of Emergency Management, 2(4), 263–274.
Mackenzie, D. (2007). Billions at risk from wheat super-blight. New Scientist, 194(2598), 6–7.
Mason, A. (2008). City releases statistics for new ShotSpotter System. Retrieved 2009, from InYork: http://www.inyork.com/ci_9822975.
Nordstrom, L. (2007). Online openness too much for Swedes. Retrieved 2009 йил from the globe and mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070617.wsnoop0617/BNStory/Technology/home.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Roberts, P. (2008). The end of food. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Sloan, D. (2007). Nissan gets testy with drunk drivers. Retrieved 2009, from The Globe and Mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070803.wgtnissan03/BNStory/Technology/home.
Stewart, T. R. (2000). Uncertainty, judgment, and error in prediction. In D. Sarewitz, R. A. Pielke Jr, & R. Byerly Jr (Eds.), Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature (pp. 41–57). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Taylor, H. C., & Russell, J. T. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: Discussion and tables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 565–578.
Telegraph. (2009). MPs’ expenses. Retrieved 2009, from Telegraph.co.uk: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/.
The Canadian Press. (2009). Claims submission process outlined in Maple Leaf listeriosis suits. Retrieved 2009, from CBC News: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/05/05/maple-leaf.html.
van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in engineering design (Vol. 9). (A. Meijers, Ed.) Amsterdam: North Holland.
Watkins, C., Mazerolle, L. G., & Rogan, D. F. (2002). Technological approaches to controlling random gunfire: Results of a gunshot detection system field test. Policing: An international journal of police strategies and management, 25(2), 345–370.
Watters, E. (2007). ShotSpotter. Retrieved 2009, from Wired Magazine: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/shotspotter.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shelley, C. Fairness in Technological Design. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 663–680 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9259-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9259-1