Abstract
Biochar is a soil—improving substrate made from phytomass pyrolysis. In Southeast Asia, its application decreases due to the long-term growth of biochar cost and thus caused further prolongation of the payback period. In the Euro-American civilization the biochar application is already almost forgotten once it has been much earlier recognized that the crop yields can be increased much faster with higher doses of nutrients and other agrochemicals. The payback period can be expected in decades. Such a long-time investment into soil fertility raises also many ethical questions. The final decision combines issues of social responsibility, risk and other financial indicators as well as personal preferences and more. The attitudes of Western and Central European decision makers in the agriculture business segment were analyzed on the basis of electronic questionnaire survey and a subsequent interview through their local unions. According to the data, most of them did not know about the possibilities of a more environmentally friendly approach to soil enhancement based on the addition of a fertilizer in the form of biochar. Among others, the collected data also shows that the decision makers from Western Europe have a much different ethical approach to the land and financial indicators than the Central Europeans.
References
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil, 337(1–2), 1–18.
Lefley, F. (1996). The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44(3), 207–224.
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006). Bio–char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 403–427.
Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(9), 1812–1836.
Maroušek, J. (2013a). Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maizesilage to accelerate biogas production. Industrial Crops and Products, 44, 253–257.
Maroušek, J. (2013b). Two-fraction anaerobic fermentation of grass waste. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93, 2410–2414.
Maroušek, J., & Braun, P. (2013). Improvements in biogas production from haylage. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(12), 561–565.
Maroušek, J., Kawamitsu, Y., Ueno, M., Kondo, Y., & Kolar, L. (2012). Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(5), 747–755.
Potthast, T., & Meisch, S. (2012). Climate change and sustainable development: Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Germany: EurSAFE.
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010). A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in agronomy (pp. 47–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tamm, C. O., & Popović, B. (1974). Intensive fertilization with nitrogen as a stressing factor in a spruce ecosystem I. Soil effects. Stockholm: Royal College of Forestry, Studia Forestalia Suecica.
Weingartner, H. M. (1969) Some new views on the payback period and capital budgeting decisions. Management Science, 15(12), B-594-B-607.
White, J. A., Agee, M. H., & Case, K. E. (1989). Principles of engineering economic analysis. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R. et al. Managerial Preferences in Relation to Financial Indicators Regarding the Mitigation of Global Change. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 203–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9531-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9531-2