Abstract
Biomedical engineering technologies such as brain–machine interfaces and neuroprosthetics are advancements which assist human beings in varied ways. There are exciting yet speculative visions of how the neurosciences and bioengineering may influence human nature. However, these could be preparing a possible pathway towards an enhanced and even posthuman future. This article seeks to investigate several ethical themes and wider questions of enhancement, transhumanism and posthumanism. Four themes of interest are: autonomy, identity, futures, and community. Three larger questions can be asked: will everyone be enhanced? Will we be “human” if we are not, one day, transhuman? Should we be enhanced or not? The article proceeds by concentrating on a widespread and sometimes controversial application: the cochlear implant, an auditory prosthesis implanted into Deaf patients. Cochlear implantation and its reception in both the deaf and hearing communities have a distinctive moral discourse, which can offer surprising insights. The paper begins with several points about the enhancement of human beings, transhumanism’s reach beyond the human, and posthuman aspirations. Next it focuses on cochlear implants on two sides. Firstly, a shorter consideration of what technologies may do to humans in a transhumanist world. Secondly, a deeper analysis of cochlear implantation’s unique socio-political movement, its ethical explanations and cultural experiences linked with pediatric cochlear implantation—and how those wary of being thrust towards posthumanism could marshal such ideas by analogy. As transhumanism approaches, the issues and questions merit continuing intense analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Google describes him as “vice president and Chief Internet Evangelist for Google” and “widely known as a ‘Father of the Internet’.” http://research.google.com/pubs/author32412.html.
References
Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28, 246–265.
Agar, N. (2007). Whereto transhumanism? The literature reaches a critical mass. The Hastings Center Report, 37(3), 12–17.
Andersson, Y., & Burch, S. (2010). Deaf and disability studies: A conversation with Yerker Andersson. In S. Burch & A. Kafer (Eds.), Deaf and disability studies: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 193–203). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Atkins, D. V. (2010). Therapeutic issues with recipients of cochlear implants. In I. W. Leigh (Ed.), Psychotherapy with deaf clients from diverse groups (pp. 300–319). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Balkany, T., Hodges, A. V., & Goodman, K. W. (1996). Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children. Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 114(6), 748–755.
Béland, J.-P., Patenaude, J., Legault, G. A., Boissy, P., & Parent, M. (2011). The social and ethical acceptability of NBICs for purposes of human enhancement: Why does the debate remain mired in impasse? Nanoethics, 5(3), 295–307.
Bishop, J. P. (2010). Transhumanism, metaphysics, and the posthuman god. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 700–720.
Blume, S. (2010). The artificial ear: Cochlear implants and the culture of deafness. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bodner-Johnson, B., & Benedict, B. S. (2012). Bilingual deaf and hearing families: Narrative interviews (p. 2012). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Boot, B. P., Partridge, B., & Hall, W. (2012). Better evidence for safety and efficacy is needed before neurologists prescribe drugs for neuroenhancement to healthy people. Neurocase, 18(3), 181–184.
Bostrom, N. (2005). In defense of posthuman dignity. Bioethics, 19(3), 202–214.
Bostrom, N. (2009). Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity (pp. 107–136). Netherlands: Springer.
Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 311–341.
Buller, T. (2013). Neurotechnology, invasiveness and the extended mind. Neuroethics, 6(3), 593–605.
Campbell, C. S., Keenan, J. F., Loy, D. R., Matthews, K., Winograd, T., et al. (2008). The machine in the body: Ethical and religious issues in the bodily incorporation of mechanical devices. In B. A. Lustig, B. A. Brody, & G. P. McKenny (Eds.), Altering nature, volume two: Religion, biotechnology, and public policy (pp. 199–257). Berlin: Springer.
Camporesi, S. (2008). Oscar Pistorius, enhancement and post-humans. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 639.
Cavuoto, J. (2002). The market for neurotechnology. Journal of Medical Marketing, 2(3), 263–274.
Chandler, J. A. (2013). Autonomy and the unintended legal consequences of emerging neurotherapies. Neuroethics, 6(2), 249–263.
Chatterjee, A. (2013). The ethics of neuroenhancement. In J. L. Bernat & H. R. Beresford (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 118, pp. 323–334). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
Chorost, M. (2005). Rebuilt: How becoming part computer made me more human. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Chorost, M. (2011). World wide mind: The coming integration of humanity, machines, and the internet. New York: Free Press.
Christiansen, J. B., & Leigh, I. W. (2004). Children with cochlear implants: Changing parent and deaf community perspectives. Archives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5), 673–677.
Christiansen, J. B., & Leigh, I. W. (2011). Cochlear implants and deaf community perceptions. In R. Paludneviciene & I. W. Leigh (Eds.), Cochlear implants: Evolving perspectives (pp. 39–55). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Clausen, J. (2009). Man, machine and in between. Nature, 457(7233), 1080–1081.
Clausen, J. (2011). Conceptual and ethical issues with brain–hardware interfaces. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24(6), 495–501.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Human being @ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cohen, R. L., Alfonso, Y. N., Adam, T., Kuruvilla, S., Schweitzer, J., & Bishai, D. (2014). Country progress towards the Millennium Development Goals: Adjusting for socioeconomic factors reveals greater progress and new challenges. Globalization and Health. doi:10.1186/s12992-014-0067-7.
Commey, P. (2014). Lessons in justice. New African, 543, 6–7.
Cooper, R. (2012). Can it be a good thing to be deaf? In P. V. Paul & D. F. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 236–252). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Cosetti, M. K., & Waltzman, S. B. (2011). Cochlear implants: Current status and future potential. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 8(3), 389–401.
Crouch, R. A. (1997). Letting the deaf be deaf: Reconsidering the use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children. Hastings Center Report, 27(4), 14–21.
Danaher, J. (2014). Hyperagency and the good life—Does extreme enhancement threaten meaning. Neuroethics, 7(2), 227–242.
Diep, L., & Wolbring, G. (2013). Who needs to fit in? Who gets to stand out? Communication technologies including brain–machine interfaces revealed from the perspectives of special education school teachers through an ableism lens. Education Sciences, 3(1), 30–49.
Douglas, T. (2013). Human enhancement and supra-personal moral status. Philosophical Studies, 162(3), 473–497.
Elliott, C. (2011). Enhancement technologies and the modern self. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36(4), 364–374.
Farman, A. (2012). Re-enchantment cosmologies: Mastery and obsolescence in an intelligent universe. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(4), 1069–1088.
Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1988). Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 510–523.
Fjord, L. (2010). Contested signs: Deaf children, indigeneity, and disablement in Denmark and the United States. In S. Burch & A. Kafer (Eds.), Deaf and disability studies: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 67–100). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Gerland, P., Raftery, A. E., Ševčíková, H., Li, N., Gu, D., et al. (2014). World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 346(6206), 234–237.
Goyal, A. K., Rath, G., & Malik, B. (2014). Emerging nanotechnology approaches for pulmonary delivery of vaccines. In M. Giese (Ed.), Molecular vaccines: From prophylaxis to therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 580–601). Cham: Springer.
Hang, A. X., Kim, G. G., & Zdanski, C. J. (2012). Cochlear implantation in unique pediatric populations. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 20(6), 507–517.
Hardonk, S., Daniels, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., et al. (2011). Deaf parents and pediatric cochlear implantation: An exploration of the decision-making process. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(3), 290–304.
Hermsen, L. (2011). Manic minds: Mania’s mad history and its neuro-future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hiddinga, A., & Crasborn, O. (2011). Signed languages and globalization. Language in Society, 40(4), 483–505.
Hollinger, D. (2013). Biotechnologies and human nature: What we should not change in who we are. Ethics and Medicine, 29(3), 173–190.
Hyde, M. B., Punch, R. J., & Komesaroff, L. (2010). Coming to a decision about cochlear implantation: Parents making choices for their deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(2), 162–178.
Jebari, K., & Hansson, S.-O. (2013). European public deliberation on brain machine interface technology: Five convergence seminars. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1071–1086.
Johnson, S., & Capdevila, R. (2014). ‘That’s just what’s expected of you… so you do it’: Mothers discussions around choice and the MMR vaccination. Psychology & Health, 29(8), 861–876.
Kermit, P. (2012). Enhancement technology and outcomes: What professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants. Health Care Analysis, 20(4), 367–384.
Kerr, I. & Wishart, J. (2008). “A tsunami wave of science”: How the technologies of transhumanist medicine are shifting Canada’s health. Health Law Journal, Special Edition, 13–40.
Kirmayer, L. J., Raikhel, E., & Rahimi, S. (2013). Cultures of the internet: Identity, community and mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(2), 165–191.
Kline, R. (2009). Where are the cyborgs in cybernetics? Social Studies of Science, 39(3), 331–362.
Koch, T. (2010). Enhancing eho? Enhancing what? Ethics, bioethics, and transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(6), 685–699.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Press.
Lane, H. L. (2002). Do deaf people have a disability? Sign Language Studies, 2(4), 356–379.
Larriviere, D., Williams, M. A., Rizzo, M., & Bonnie, R. J. (2009). Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements: Guidance of the ethics. Law and Humanities Committee. Neurology, 73(17), 1406–1412.
Leigh, I. W., & Maxwell-McCaw, D. (2011). Cochlear implants: Implications for deaf identities. In R. Paludneviciene & I. W. Leigh (Eds.), Cochlear implants: Evolving perspectives (pp. 95–110). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Levy, N. (2002). Reconsidering cochlear implants: The lessons of Martha’s Vineyard. Bioethics, 16(2), 134–153.
Mauldin, L. (2014). Precarious plasticity: Neuropolitics, cochlear implants, and the redefinition of deafness. Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 130–153.
Mehlman, M. J. (2012). Transhumanist dreams and dystopian nightmares: The promise and peril of genetic engineering. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Menuz, V., Hurlimann, T., & Godard, B. (2013). Is human enhancement also a personal matter? Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 161–177.
Michael, K. (2014). Beyond human: Lifelogging and life extension. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33(2), 4–6.
Miller, Margery. (2012). Deaf worldviews, views of the deaf world, and the role of deaf children of hearing parents in creating a deaf epistemology. In P. V. Paul & D. F. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 147–157). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Mills, M. (2011). Do signals have politics? Inscribing abilities in cochlear implants. In K. Bijsterveld & T. Pinch (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sound studies (pp. 320–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
More, M. (2013). The philosophy of transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future (pp. 1–17). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Nario-Redmond, M. R., Noel, J. G., & Fern, E. (2013). Redefining disability, re-imagining the self: Disability identification predicts self-esteem and strategic responses to stigma. Self and Identity, 12(5), 468–488.
O’Brien, L. C., Kenna, M., Neault, M., Clark, T. A., Kammerer, B., et al. (2010). Not a “sound” decision: Is cochlear implantation always the best choice? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(10), 1144–1148.
Patil, P. G., & Turner, D. A. (2008). The development of brain–machine interface neuroprosthetic devices. Neurotherapeutics, 5(1), 137–146.
Paulesu, E., Harrison, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Watson, J. D. G., Goldstein, L., Heather, J., et al. (1995). The physiology of coloured hearing A PET activation study of colour-word synaesthesia. Brain, 118, 661–676.
Quadri-Sheriff, M., Hendrix, K. S., Downs, S. M., Sturm, L. A., Zimet, G. D., & Finnell, S. M. E. (2012). The role of herd immunity in parents’ decision to vaccinate children: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 130(3), 522–530.
Quet, M. (2014). It will be a disaster!. How people protest against things which have not yet happened: Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662514533752.
Ramsey, N. F., Aarnoutse, E. J., & Vansteensel, M. J. (2014). Brain implants for substituting lost motor function: State of the art and potential impact on the lives of motor-impaired seniors’. Gerontology, 60(4), 366–372.
Roberts, D. (2010). The social immorality of health in the gene age: Race, disability, and inequality. In J. Metzl & A. Kirkland (Eds.), Against health: How health became the new morality (pp. 61–71). New York: New York University Press.
Sarant, J. (2012). Cochlear implants in children: A review. In S. Naz (Ed.), Hearing loss (pp. 356–362). InTech. doi:10.5772/32762.
Schlaepfer, T. E. (2014). Deep brain stimulation of the human reward system for major depression—rationale, outcomes and outlook. Neuropsychopharmacology, 39(6), 1303–1314.
Sharon, T. (2014). Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Dordrecht: Springer.
Siebers, T. (2010). In the name of pain. In J. Metzl & A. Kirkland (Eds.), Against health: How health became the new morality (pp. 183–194). New York: New York University Press.
Sorkin, D. L. (2013). Cochlear implantation in the world’s largest medical device market: Utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants International, 14(Suppl 1), S4–S12.
Sparrow, R. (2005). Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 135–152.
Sparrow, R. (2010). Implants and ethnocide: Learning from the cochlear implant controversy. Disability & Society, 25(4), 455–466.
Sparrow, R. (2014). Egalitarianism and moral bioenhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(4), 20–28.
Temkin, L. S. (2013). What’s wrong with enhancements? Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(12), 729–731.
The Editors of the Lancet. (2010). Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 375, 445.
Tirosh-Samuelson, H., & Mossman, K. L. (2012). New perspectives on transhumanism. In H. Tirosh-Samuelson & K. L. Mossman (Eds.), Building better humans? Refocusing the debate on transhumanism (pp. 29–52). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Tucker, B. P. (1998). Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability. Hastings Center Report, 28(4), 6–14.
Valente, J. M., Bahan, B., & Bauman, H.-D. (2011). Sensory politics and the cochlear implant debates. In R. Paludneviciene & I. W. Leigh (Eds.), Cochlear implants: Evolving perspectives (pp. 245–258). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Van Hilvoorde, I., & Landeweerd, L. (2010). Enhancing disabilities: Transhumanism under the veil of inclusion? Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(26), 2222–2227.
Veditz, G. (1912). Proceedings of the ninth convention of the national association of the deaf and the third world’s congress of the deaf, Colorado Springs, Colo. August 6–13, 1910. Los Angeles, CA: The Philocophus Press.
Vermeulen, A. M., van Bon, W., Schreuder, R., Knoors, H., & Snik, A. (2007). Reading comprehension of deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 283–302.
Warwick, K., Gasson, M. N., & Spiers, A. J. (2007). Therapeutic potential of computer to cerebral cortex implantable devices. In D. E. Sakas & B. A. Simpson (Eds.), Operative neuromodulation volume 2: Neural networks surgery (pp. 529–535). New York: Springer.
Wolbring, G. (2013). Hearing beyond the normal enabled by therapeutic devices: The role of the recipient and the hearing profession. Neuroethics, 6(3), 607–616.
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002). Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 767–791.
Woolf, N. J., Priel, A., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2009). Nanoneuroscience: Structural and functional roles of the neuronal cytoskeleton in health and disease. Heidelberg: Springer.
Yokoi, H. (2009). Cyborg (brain–machine/computer interface). Advanced Robotics, 23(11), 1451–1454.
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge the thoughtful comments, encouragement, and insightful suggestions of the editors and anonymous reviewers which assisted in the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standard
There was no research involving human participants and/or animals conducted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J. Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 67–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9640-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9640-6