Abstract
The changing milieu of research—increasingly global, interdisciplinary and collaborative—prompts greater emphasis on cultural context and upon partnership with international scholars and diverse community groups. Ethics training, however, tends to ignore the cross-cultural challenges of making ethical choices. This paper confronts those challenges by presenting a new curricular model developed by an international team. It examines ethics across a very broad range of situations, using case studies and employing the perspectives of social science, humanities and the sciences. The course has been developed and taught in a highly collaborative way, involving researchers and students at Zhejiang University, the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay and Brown University. The article presents the curricular modules of the course, learning outcomes, an assessment framework developed for the project, and a discussion of evaluation findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1305–1322.
Barnhart, M. (Ed.). (2002). Varieties of ethical reflection: New directions for ethics in a global context. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Benatar, S. R. (2002). Some reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science and Medicine, 54(7), 1131–1141.
Benatar, S. R. (2004). Towards progress in resolving dilemmas in international research ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32(4), 574–582.
Benatar, S. R., Daar, A., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Global health ethics: The rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs, 79, 107–138.
Bishop, R. (1998). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 199–219.
Bullock, M., & Panicker, S. (2003). Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 159–170.
Denzin, N. K. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 933–958). London: Sage Publication.
Downey, G. L., Lucena, J., & Mitcham, C. (2007). Engineering ethics and identity: Emerging initiatives in comparative perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 463–487.
Elliott, D. (2007). Ethics in the first person: A guide to teaching and learning practical ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Forsyth, D., O’Boyle, E. H, Jr, & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 831–833.
Frost, M. (2009). Global ethics: Anarchy, freedom and international relations. London: Routledge.
Harris, C. E, Jr. (2004). Internationalizing professional codes in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 503–521.
Ip, P. K. (2009). Is confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 463–476.
Kim, S., Phillips, W. R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., & Keary, J. (2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical Education, 40, 867–876.
Klestova, Z., & Makarenko, A. (2002). Conflict of interest between eastern and western scientific systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 387–392.
Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., & Hougen, D. F. (2008). Application of a sense-making approach to training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 251–278.
Kolodner, J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6, 3–34.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2004). Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 57–78.
Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J., & Diller, K. R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 257–276.
Miner, M., & Petocz, A. (2003). Moral theory in ethical decision making: Problems, clarification and recommendations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 21.
Mishkin, B. (1999). Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5, 293–298.
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, S., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2007). Sense-making approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 17, 337–366.
Muskavitch, K. M. T. (2005). Commentary on ‘connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory’. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431–434.
Mutua, K., & Swadener, B. B. (2004). Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Patai, D. (1991). US academics and third-world women: Is ethical research possible? In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practise of oral history (pp. 137–153). New York: Routledge.
Pustovit, S. V. (2006). Some methodological aspects of committees’ expertise: The Ukranian example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 85–94.
Rhoades, L., & Górski, A. (2000). Scientific misconduct: An international perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6, 5–10.
Shigemi, I., & Richard, K. L. (Eds.). (2001). Crossing cultural borders: Toward an ethics of intercultural communication: Beyond reciprocal anthropology. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
Sterba, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Ethics: Classical western texts in feminist and multicultural perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vallero, D. (2007). Beyond responsible conduct in research: New pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 17(7), 1–12.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation. Our work was funded through the EESE program (Ethics Education in Science and Engineering), Proposal Number 0933509.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Pre-participation Evaluation Survey: Ethics in an International Context
Appendix 2: Post-participation Evaluation Survey: Ethics in an International Context
Appendix 3: Focus Group Interview Protocol—Students
-
1.
Why be ethical? (If focus group interview, ask each person to map out a response to this—graphics—images—words—on a large post-it; then explain the post-it to the group).
-
2.
To what extent did participation in the ethics course influence the way you answer the question, “Why be ethical?”
-
3.
What were the most striking “take-aways” from the seminar as you reflect on the past year?
-
4.
What topics/themes/cases do you think prompted new thinking about ethics in a global context? (Probe for explanation of why).
-
5.
In retrospect—least helpful?
-
6.
To what extent has the seminar influenced how you make ethical decisions?
-
7.
To what extent has it impacted your choice of study, work or research?
-
8.
Think about the format of the seminar. What types of activities prompted the most learning for you? (assigned readings, class discussions, case study analyses, weekly assignments, working on the “Ethical Framework”, research and writing your final paper, video conference with Chinese and Indian students)
-
9.
Looking back, would you recommend changes to the course that would enhance learning?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonde, S., Briant, C., Firenze, P. et al. Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 343–366 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9641-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9641-5