Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Polemics on Ethical Aspects in the Compost Business

  • Opinion
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on compost use in overpasses and underpasses for wild animals over roads and other similar linear structures. In this context, good quality of compost may result in faster and more resistant vegetation cover during the year. Inter alia, this can be interpreted also as reduction of damage and saving lives. There are millions of tones of plant residue produced every day worldwide. These represent prospective business for manufacturers of compost additives called “accelerators”. The opinions of the sale representatives’ with regards to other alternatives of biowaste utilization and their own products were reviewed. The robust analyzes of several “accelerated” composts revealed that the quality was generally low. Only two accelerated composts were somewhat similar in quality to the blank sample that was produced according to the traditional procedure. Overlaps between the interests of decision makers on future soil fertility were weighed against the preferences on short-term profit. Possible causes that allowed the boom of these underperforming products and the possible consequences are also discussed. Conclusions regarding the ethical concerns on how to run businesses with products whose profitability depends on weaknesses in the legal system and customer unawareness are to follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, S., Peters, A., Trinks, S., Schonsky, H., Facklam, M., & Wessolek, G. (2013). Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma, 202–203, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review. Plant and Soil, 337(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. (2005). Biomass–coal co-combustion: Opportunity for affordable renewable energy. Fuel, 84(10), 1295–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., & van den Broek, R. (2003). The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: A review of 17 studies. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Shield, I., & Williams, P. T. (2008). Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel, 87(6), 844–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011). Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, R., Holmes, M., Arunsopha, V., Chin, N., Le, T., Maung, S., & Shum, M. (2014). Consumer choice and farmers’ markets. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango, D., Thinakaran, N., Panneerselvam, P., & Sivanesan, S. (2009). Thermophilic composting of municipal solid waste. Applied Energy, 86(5), 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). Accompanying the communication from the commission on future steps in bio-waste management in the European Union. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/compost/pdf/sec_biowaste.pdf.

  • Fangrui, M., & Milford, A. H. (1999). Biodiesel production: A review. Bioresource Technology, 70(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, M. V., Casal, D., Pevida, C., Pis, J. J., & Rubiera, F. (2010). Thermal behaviour and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co-combustion. Bioresource Technology, 101(14), 5601–5608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grass, S. W., & Jenkins, B. M. (1994). Biomass fueled fluidized bed combustion: Atmospheric emissions, emission control devices and environmental regulations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 6(4), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunaseelan, V. N. (1997). Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13(1), 83–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, K. R. G., & Bemtgen, J. M. (1998). EU clean coal technology—Co-combustion of coal and biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 54(1–3), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. R., & Bhave, P. P. (2006). In-vessel composting of household wastes. Waste Management, 26(10), 1070–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolář, L., Kužel, S., Peterka, J., & Borová-Batt, J. (2011). Utilisation of waste from digesters for biogas production. In Marco Aurélio dos Santos Bernardes (Ed.), Biofuels engineering process technology (pp. 191–220). New York: InTech.

  • Kurian, J. K., Nair, G. R., Hussain, A., & Raghavan, G. S. V. (2013). Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processesfor sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laner, D., Crest, M., Scharff, H., Morris, J. W., & Barlaz, M. A. (2012). A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Management, 32(3), 498–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaridi, K., Protopapa, I., Kotsou, M., Pilidis, G., Manios, T., & Kyriacou, A. (2006). Quality assessment of composts in the Greek market: The need for standards and quality assurance. Journal of Environmental Management, 80(1), 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, J., Rillig, M., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(9), 1812–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, X. F., & Nair, J. (2009). The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions—A review. Bioresource Technology, 100(16), 3792–3798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmo, L. (2008). EU strategies and policies on soil and waste management to offset greenhouse gas emissions. Waste Management, 28(4), 685–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J. (2012). Pretreatment of sunflower stalks for biogas production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15(4), 735–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J. (2013). Two-fraction anaerobic fermentation of grass waste. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(10), 2410–2414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J. (2014). Biotechnological partition of the grass silage to streamline its complex energy utilization. International Journal of Green Energy, 11(9), 962–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2014). Nutrient management in processing of steam-exploded lignocellulose phytomass. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 37(11), 1945–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Kawamitsu, Y., Ueno, M., Kondo, Y., & Kolář, L. (2012). Methods for improving methane yields from rye straw. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(5), 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Kondo, Y., Ueno, M., & Kawamitsu, Y. (2013). Commercial-scale utilization of greenhouse residues. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 60(2), 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., & Kwan, J. H. T. (2013). Use of pressure manifestations following the water plasma expansion for phytomass disintegration. Water Science and Technology, 67(8), 1695–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, D. (2009). Good ethics can sometimes mean better science: Research ethics and the milgram experiments. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(1), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010). Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 578–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulrud, S., & Nilsson, C. (2001). Briquetting and combustion of spring–harvest reed canary-grass: Effect of fuel composition. Biomass and Bioenergy, 20(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psomopoulos, C. S., Bourka, A., & Themelis, N. J. (2009). Waste-to-energy: A review of the status and benefits in USA. Waste Management, 29(5), 1718–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoneit, B. R. T. (2002). Biomass burning—A review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion. Applied Geochemistry, 17(3), 129–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spliethoff, H., & Hein, K. R. G. (1998). Effect of co-combustion of biomass on emissions in pulverized fuel furnaces. Fuel Processing Technology, 54(1–3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002). Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A review. Bioresource Technology, 83(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, M., Vikman, M., Hatakka, A., & Itävaara, M. (2000). Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: A review. Bioresource Technology, 72(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Institute of Technology and Businesses in České Budějovice, Okružní 517/10, 370 01, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

    Josef Maroušek, Simona Hašková, Robert Zeman, Jaroslav Žák, Radka Vaníčková, Anna Maroušková & Jan Váchal

  2. Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    Kateřina Myšková

Authors
  1. Josef Maroušek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simona Hašková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Zeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jaroslav Žák
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Radka Vaníčková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anna Maroušková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jan Váchal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kateřina Myšková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Maroušek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R. et al. Polemics on Ethical Aspects in the Compost Business. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 581–590 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9664-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9664-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation