Abstract
As knowledge has become more closely tied to economic development, the interrelationship between academia and industry has become stronger. The result has been the emergence of what Slaughter and Leslie call academic capitalism. Inevitably, tensions between academia and industry arise; however, universities such as MIT and Stanford with long traditions of industry interaction have been able to achieve a balance between academic and market values. This paper describes the strategies adopted by MIT and Stanford to achieve this balance. The results indicate that implicit culture is a stronger determinant of balance than are explicit rules. Finally, the author proposes a concept of balance to reconsider the relationship between academia and industry: today’s universities, particularly those with strengths in engineering and management, are both symbiotic and interdependent with industry. A reasonable attitude toward the university-industry relationship is that of balance rather than strict separation. Universities can thus establish effective mechanisms to reach a balance between conflicting values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bush, V. (1970). Pieces of the action. New York: William Morrow.
Chan, A. S., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2008). The exchange of university: Corporatization of academic culture. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. California: University of California Press.
Clark, B. R. (1998a). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon.
Clark, B. R. (1998b). A note on pursuing things that work. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Colyvas, J. A., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., & Sampat, B. N. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61–72.
Colyvas, J. A., & Powell, W. W. (2007). From vulnerable to venerated: The institutionalization of academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 25, 219–259.
Davis, M. (1991). University research and the wages of commerce. Journal of College and University Law, 18(1), 29–38.
Faust, D. (2010). The role of the university in a changing world. http://www.harvard.edu/president/speech/2010/role-university-changing-world. Accessed 12 May 2014.
Faust, D. (2013). Opening year address. http://www.harvard.edu/president/opening-year-address. Accessed 16 May 2014.
Faust, D. (2014). The region of ideas and invention. http://harvardmagazine.com/2014/05/the-region-of-ideas-and-invention. Accessed 10 May 2014.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Gillmor, C. S. (2004). Fred Terman at Stanford: Building a discipline, a university, and silicon valley. California: Stanford University Press.
Gumport, P. J. (Ed.). (2007). Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Hennessy, J. (2002). The first great American university: Innovation and visionhave set Stanford apart. Stanford Alumni. http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=37567. Accessed 8 May 2014.
Hennessy, J. (2008). The DNA of innovation: Big ideas begin with fundamental new insights. Stanford Alumni. http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/mayjun/dept/prez.html. Accessed 14 May 2014.
Hockfield, S. (2007). Universities and the global knowledge economy. http://hockfield.mit.edu/universities-and-global-knowledge-economy. Accessed 8 May 2014.
Hockfield, S. (2011). Revving up America’s innovation engine. http://hockfield.mit.edu/revving-americas-innovation-engine. Accessed 12 May 2014.
Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Killian, J. R. (1985). The education of a college president: A memoir. Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.
Lecuyer, C. (1992). The making of a science based technological university: Karl Compton, James Killian, and the reform of MIT, 1930-1957. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 23(1), 153–180.
Levin, R. C. (2001). The university as an engine of economic growth. http://communications.yale.edu/president/speeches/2001/05/05/university-engine-economic-growth. Accessed 15 May 2014.
Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governmence and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mendoza, P. (2012). The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 26–48.
Mendoza, P. (2015). Industry-academia linkages: Lessons from empirical studies and recommendations for future inquiry. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 30, 469–523.
Mendoza, P., Kuntz, A. M., & Berger, J. B. (2012). Bourdieu and academic capitalism: Faculty “habitus” in material science and engineering. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(4), 558–581.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta, New York: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
MIT. (1982). Report to the president. http://web.mit.edu/annualreports/. Accessed 4 May 2014.
MIT. (1994). Report to the president. http://dome.mit.edu/handle/1721.3/59073. Accessed 1 June 2014.
MIT. (2013). Massachusetts Institute of Technology policy and procedures on conflicts of interest in research. http://coi.mit.edu/research/sites/coi/files/coi-policy-updated-final-2013-10-23.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2015.
MIT Institutional Office. (2014). Research expenditures by primary sponsor. http://web.mit.edu/ir/financial/re.html. Accessed 10 May 2014.
National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01).
Peterson, M. W. (2000). The tyranny of success: The research-practice tension. New Directions for Higher Education, 2000(110), 21–34.
Readings, B. (1997). The university in ruins. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Ridgeway, J. (1968). The closed corporation: American universities in crisis. New York: Ballantine Books.
Servos, J. W. (1980). The industrial relations of science: Chemical engineering at MIT, 1900–1939. History of Science Society, 71(4), 530–549.
Servos, J. W. (2005). Review of the book Impure cultures: University biology and the world of commerce. Technology and Culture, 46(1), 255–257.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, states, and higher education. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanford. (2014). Stanford research policy handbook. https://doresearch.stanford.edu/research-scholarship/conflicts-interest/overview-conflicts-interest-coi. Accessed 5 May 2014.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: SAGE Publications.
Vest, C. M. (1999). Three questions in search of answers. http://web.mit.edu/annualreports/pres99/index.html. Accessed 10 May 2014.
Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage Publications.
Ylijoki, O. (2005). Academic nostalgia: A narrative approach to academic work. Human Relations, 58, 555–576.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China under Grant No. 13YJC880127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, F., Hawk, S. Rethinking the Relationship Between Academia and Industry: Qualitative Case Studies of MIT and Stanford. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 1497–1511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9699-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9699-0