Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Continuing Medical Education: A Cross Sectional Study on a Developing Country’s Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the attitude of general practitioners towards continuing medical education (CME) and reasons motivating or hindering them from attending CME procedures, we conducted a cross-sectional survey from November 2013 to April 2014 in Karachi. Three hundred general practitioners who possessed a medical license for practice in Pakistan filled a pre-designed questionnaire consisting of questions pertaining to attitudes towards CME. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS v16.0. 70.3% (n = 211) of the participants were males. Mean age was 47.75 ± 9.47 years. Only 67.33% knew about CME and only 52% had attended a CME session. Reasons for attending CME procedures reported were: need for updating knowledge, skills and competencies (67.30%), opportunity to meet colleagues (18.58%) and presenting scientific papers (8.97%). Mean Likert score was 1.67 (±0.667) for those who thought CME is worthwhile and 1.44 (±0.686) for those who consider their clinical duties as the major hurdle in attending CME procedures. Most common cause for not attending CME was lack of knowledge (32.66%) followed by time constraint (24%). Most physicians were not sufficiently informed about the potential benefits of CME and had never attended a CME session. Most common reason for attending CME procedures reported was need for updating knowledge, skills and competencies while reasons hindering physicians from attending CME were lack of knowledge and time constraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CME:

Continuing medical education

References

  • Alsharif, A. I., & Al-Khaldi, Y. M. (2001). Attitude, practice and needs for continuing medical education among primary health care doctors in Asir region. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 8(3), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrades, M., Paul, R., & Ali, B. S. (2003). Continuing medical education for general practitioners. Medicine Today, 1(1), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordage, G., Carlin, B., Mazmanian, P. E., & American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. (2009). Continuing medical education effect on physician knowledge: Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest, 135(3 Suppl), 29S–36S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J. C. (1979). Continuing medical education. JAMA, 242(11), 1145–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, P., & Jones, R. (1999). Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ, 318(7193), 1276–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casebeer, L., Brown, J., Roepke, N., Grimes, C., Henson, B., Palmore, R., Granstaff, U. S., & Salinas, G. D. (2010). Evidence-based choices of physicians: A comparative analysis of physicians participating in Internet CME and non-participants. BMC Medical Education, 10, 10–42.

  • Davis, D. (1998). Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 28(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., & Galbraith, R. (2009). Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest, 135(3 Suppl), 42S–48S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D., & Haynes, R. B. (2005). Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA, 274, 700–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, H. C., Reddy, S. S., Dawson, K. G., Yale, J. F., Shannon, S., & Norman, G. (1999). A controlled evaluation of a national continuing medical education programme designed to improve family physicians’ implementation of diabetes-specific clinical practice guidelines. Diabetic Medicine, 16(11), 964–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamiz-ul-Fawad, S., Ahmed, G., & Ali, S. A. (2013). Continuing medical education: Pakistan, a developing country’s perspective. American Journal of Medical Quality, 28(2), 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C., & Hogg, W. (2003). Why do doctors attend traditional CME events if they don’t change what they do in their surgeries? Evaluation of doctors’ reasons for attending a traditional CME programme. Medical Education, 37(10), 884–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, M. Z., Nizami, R., & Riaz, H. (2016). Faculty perceptions about continuing medical education activities. Advances in Health Professions Education, 2(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moores, L. K., Dellert, E., Baumann, M. H., Rosen, M. J., & American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. (2009). Executive summary: Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest, 135(3 Suppl), 1S–4S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza, A., Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2009). Best evidence continuous medical education. Archives Gynecology Obstetrics, 280(4), 683–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resource document. American Medical Association. Continuing Medical Education for Licensure Reregistration. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/40/table16.pdf.

  • Resource document. City District Government Karachi. http://www.karachicity.gov.pk/.

  • Resource document. CME Coalition. http://cmecoalition.org/news/continuing-medical-education-cme-coalition-releases-results-of-new-physician-survey.

  • Richards, R. K., & Cohen, R. M. (1980). Why physicians attend traditional CME programs. Journal of Medical Education, 55(6), 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segen, J. C. (2002). McGraw-Hill concise dictionary of modern medicine. New York City, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, Z. S. (2002). Continuous professional development among psychiatrists in Pakistan: Needs and practices. Journal of College of Physicians & Surgeons Pakistan, 12(12), 748–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. D., & Khadra, M. H. (2009). The continuing medical education activities and attitudes of Australian doctors working in different clinical specialties and practice locations. Australian Health Review, 33(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, P. B., Wang, V. L., Flynn, B. S., Cuthie, J., Salim, J. H., Windsor, R. A., Smith P. L., & Williamson, J. (1981). A continuing medical education program in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases: Design and outcome. American Review Respiratory Diseases, 123(1), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wazana, A. (2000). Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA, 283(3), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabar, S., Hanley, K., Stevens, D. L., Ciotoli, C., Hsieh, A., Griesser, C., Anderson, M., & Kalet, A. (2010). Can interactive skills-based seminars with standardized patients enhance clinicians’ prevention skills? Measuring the impact of a CME program. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 248–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Arsalan Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to disclose

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, S.A., Hamiz ul Fawwad, S., Ahmed, G. et al. Continuing Medical Education: A Cross Sectional Study on a Developing Country’s Perspective. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 251–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9900-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9900-8

Keywords

Navigation