Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation Study of Envelope Wave Electrical Nerve Stimulation Based on a Real Head Model

  • Research
  • Published:
Neuroinformatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the modulation of brain neural activity by applied electromagnetic fields has become a hot spot in neuroscience research. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are two common non-invasive neuromodulation techniques. However, conventional tACS has limited stimulation effects in the deeper parts of the brain. In this study, a method of low and medium frequency envelope wave neurostimulation is proposed, and its effectiveness and safety are evaluated by simulation and human experiment. First, we built a real head model from head MRI image data and used the finite element method to calculate the current distribution of the envelope wave in the brain. Then, a single-compartment neuron model was constructed in NEURON software to simulate the action potential generation of neurons under different frequencies of electrical stimulation. Finally, a human experiment was conducted to investigate the threshold of human perception of envelope wave electrical stimulation. The results show that envelope wave can both increase the depth of stimulation and induce neurons to generate effective action potentials. In envelope wave electrical stimulation, the optimal modulating wave frequency was 50 Hz, and the carrier frequency was 2 kHz-3 kHz. This method is expected to play an important role in the non-invasive treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Alam, M., Truong, D. Q., Khadka, N., & Bikson, M. (2016). Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Physics in Medicine & Biology, 61(12), 4506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. L., et al. (2019). Double-blind, randomized pilot clinical trial targeting alpha oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Antal, A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2016). Transcranial alternating current and random noise stimulation: possible mechanisms. Neural Plasticity, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3616807

  • Camacho-Conde, J. A., del Rosario Gonzalez-Bermudez, M., Carretero-Rey, M., & Khan, Z. U. (2023). Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., & Grover, P. (2019). Stimulus: Noninvasive dynamic patterns of neurostimulation using spatio-temporal interference. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67(3), 726–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, N. T., & Hines, M. L. (2006). The NEURON book. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., Li, H., Dang, H., Zhang, X., Yue, S., & Zhang, H. (2023). Corrigendum: Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1293703

  • Grossman, N., et al. (2017). Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell, 169(6), 1029–1041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1990). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52, 25–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Parra, L. C. (2018). ROAST: an open-source, fully-automated, realistic volumetric-approach-based simulator for TES. In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 3072–3075). IEEE.

  • Huang, Y., et al. (2017). Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation. eLife, 6, e18834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Parra, L. C., & Haufe, S. (2016). The New York Head—A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting. NeuroImage, 140, 150–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunold, A., Haueisen, J., Nees, F., & Moliadze, V. (2023). Review of individualized current flow modeling studies for transcranial electrical stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 101(4), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, B., & Yarom, Y. (2000). Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(5), 216–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jurcak, V., Tsuzuki, D., & Dan, I. (2007). 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage, 34(4), 1600–1611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaliukhovich, D. A., & Op de Beeck, H. (2018). Hierarchical stimulus processing in rodent primary and lateral visual cortex as assessed through neuronal selectivity and repetition suppression. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120(3), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00673.2017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kim, H., Jeong, H., Roh, D., & Kim, D. H. (2021). tACS as a promising therapeutic option for improving cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: A direct comparison between tACS and tDCS. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 141, 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. R., Vieira, P. G., Csorba, B. A., Pilly, P. K., & Pack, C. C. (2019). Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5747–5755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Qiu, F., Hou, L., & Wang, X. (2022). Review of noninvasive or minimally invasive deep brain stimulation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.820017

  • Otsuki, M., & Terenzio, M. (2023). Mechanisms of axonal degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system. Neuroscience Research, 197, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2023.10.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, P. A. (2013). Fatigue: Neural and muscular mechanisms (Vol. 384). Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Raghavan, M., Fee, D., & Barkhaus, P. E. (2019). Generation and propagation of the action potential. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00001-1

  • Reinhart, R. M. G., & Nguyen, J. A. (2019). Working memory revived in older adults by synchronizing rhythmic brain circuits. Nature Neuroscience, 22(5), 820–827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Huguet, M., Ayala-Martínez, C., Vinolo-Gil, M. J., Góngora-Rodríguez, P., Martín-Valero, R., & Góngora-Rodríguez, J. (2024). Transcranial direct current stimulation in physical therapy treatment for adults after stroke: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation, 54(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, S., Chauhan, M., Sajib, S. Z. K., & Sadleir, R. J. (2021). Influence of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) waveforms on neural excitability of a realistic axon: a simulation study. In 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 6725–6727). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629948

  • Singh, I. (1964). The basis of excitation and action potential in muscle and nerve. Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie, 72(3), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.3109/13813456409065347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoornweder, S., Meesen, R., & Caulfield, K. A. (2022). On the importance of using both T1-weighted and T2-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging scans to model electric fields induced by non-invasive brain stimulation in SimNIBS. Brain Stimulation, 15(3), 641–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villamar, M. F., Volz, M. S., Bikson, M., Datta, A., DaSilva, A. F., & Fregni, F. (2013). Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), (77), e50309. https://doi.org/10.3791/50309

  • Vöröslakos, M., et al. (2018). Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans. Nature Communications, 9(1), 483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vosskuhl, J., Strüber, D., & Herrmann, C. S. (2018). Non-invasive brain stimulation: A paradigm shift in understanding brain oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00211

  • Wang, S.-M.S., et al. (2021). Designing and pilot testing a novel high-definition transcranial burst electrostimulation device for neurorehabilitation. Journal of Neural Engineering, 18(5), 056030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao-Dong, L., & Xiao-Hui, W. (2021). Progress in regulation of accurate positioning brain stimulation on motor function. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 48(6), 659–666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant number:21S31906000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant 61803265 and Medical-industrial cross-project of USST Grant 1022308524 for founding the study.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant number:21S31906000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant 61803265, in part by Medical-industrial cross-project of USST Grant 1022308524.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Liu and Zou developed the equipment and wrote the manuscript. Zhao and Jin prepared simulation materials and data. Hu and Yin arranged all the pictures. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renling Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zou, R., Zhao, L. et al. Simulation Study of Envelope Wave Electrical Nerve Stimulation Based on a Real Head Model. Neuroinform 23, 15 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-024-09711-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-024-09711-4

Keywords

Navigation