Summary
The growth of physiology in the 19th and 20th centuries was accompanied by the development of disciplinary boundaries between physiology and other biological sciences. Physiology became the study of the mechanisms that underlie the functions of organisms and their component parts. Concern with the internal workings of organisms has led physiologists to focus on the maintenance of homeostasis in the internal environment rather than on the interactions of organisms with their external environments. Moreover, interest in the cellular or biochemical mechanisms that underlie organismal function has resulted in the use of inbred populations of laboratory animals in which these mechanisms can be most rigorously studied. Finally, emphasis on the function of fully developed or adult organisms has been accompanied by a relative neglect of developmental processes. Disregard for the environment, for variation, and for development has made possible major advances in our knowledge of physiological mechanisms but has led to an impoverished concept of organisms. Incorporation of evolutionary, ecological, and developmental perspectives into the study of organisms might help to unite physiology more closely with the other biological sciences and lead to a richer and fuller understanding of organisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barcroft, J. (1934) Features in the Architecture of Physiological Function, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bernard, C. (1865) Introduction a l’Étude de la Médecine Expérimentale, Paris, J.-B. Bailliére. English translation: An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (Green, H. C., tr.), New York, Dover, 1957
Bernard, C. (1878) Leçons sur les Phénomènes de la Vie communs aux Animaux et aux Vegetaux, Paris, J.-B. Bailliére. English translation: Lectures on the Phenomena of Life Common to Animals and Plants (Hoff, H. E., Guillemin, R., and Guillemin, L., tr.), Springfield, IL, Thomas, 1974.
Boesiger, E. (1980) Evolutionary biology in France at the time of the evolutionary synthesis. In The Evolutionary Synthesis (Mayr, E., and Provine, W. B., eds.), Cambridge, MA, Harvard, pp. 309–321.
Cannon, W. B. (1929) Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 9, 399–431.
Close, B. T. (1993) The Wistar Rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. J. Hist. Biol. 26, 329–349.
Coleman, W. (1985): The cognitive basis of the discipline: Claude Bernard on physiology. Isis 76, 49–70.
Darwin, C. (1872) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, London, Appleton.
Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel, New York, Norton.
Grmek, M. (1973) Bernard, Claude. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography (Gillespie, C. C., ed.), New York, Scribners, vol. 2, pp. 24–34.
Halberg, F. (1967) Claude Bernard and the “extreme variability of the internal milieu.” In Claude Bernard and Experimental Medicine (Grande, F., and Visscher, M. B., eds.), Cambridge, MA, Schenkman.
Haldane, J. S. (1931) The Philosophical Basis of Biology, Garden City, NY, Doubleday, Doran & Co.
Mayr, E. (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134, 1501–1506.
Riese, W. (1943) Claude Bernard in the light of modern science. Bull. Hist. Med. 14, 281–294.
Roll-Hansen (1976) Critical teleology: Immanuel Kant and Claude Bernard on the limitations of experimental biology. J. Hist. Biol. 9, 59–91.
Schiller, J. (1968) Physiology’s struggle for independence in the first half of the nineteenth century. Hist. Sci. 7, 64–89.
Silverthorn, D.U. (1998) Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Vander, A., Sherman, J., and Luciano, D. (1998) Human Physiology, 7th Ed., Boston, WCB/McGraw-Hill.
Virchow, R. (1858) Die Cellularpathologie, Berlin, Hirschwald. English translation: Cellular Pathology (Chance, F., tr.), New York, Dover, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perlman, R.L. The concept of the organism in physiology. Theory Biosci. 119, 174–186 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-000-0015-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-000-0015-3