Skip to main content
Log in

Competing with oneself: introducing self-interaction in a model of competitive learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A competitive learning model was introduced in Mehta and Luck (Phys Rev E 60, 5:5218–5230, 1999), in which the learning is outcome-related. Every individual chooses between a pair of existing strategies or types, guided by a combination of two factors: tendency to conform to the local majority, and a preference for the type with higher perceived success among its neighbors, based on their relative outcomes. Here, an extension of the interfacial model of Mehta and Luck (Phys Rev E 60, 5:5218–5230, 1999) is proposed, in which individuals additionally take into account their own outcomes in arriving at their outcome-based choices. Three possible update rules for handling bulk sites are considered. The corresponding phase diagrams, obtained at coexistence, show systematic departures from the original interfacial model. Possible relationships of these variants with the cooperative model of Mehta and Luck (Phys Rev E 60, 5:5218–5230, 1999) are also touched upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bala V, Goyal S (1998) Learning from neighbours. Rev Econ Stud 65:595–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros K, Krapvisky PL, Redner S (2009) Freezing into stripe states in two-dimensional ferromagnets and crossing probabilities in critical percolation. Phys Rev E 80:040401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin A, Verdier T (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. J Econ Theory 97:298–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano C, Fortunato S, Loreto V (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 81:591–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Xu SH (2004) Technology diffusion by learning from neighbours. Adv Appl Probab 355(376):355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen K, Moloney NR (2005) Complexity and criticality. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley TG, Udry CR (2000) Learning about a new technology: pineapple growers in Ghana. Mimeo Northwestern and Yale Universities

  • de Oliveira MJ, Mendes JFF, Santos MA (1993) Nonequilibrium spin models with Ising universal behaviour. J Phys A 26:2317–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornic I, Chaté H, Chave J, Hinrichsen H (2001) Critical coarsening without surface tension: the universality class of the voter model. Phys Rev Lett 87(4)045701

  • Drouffe JM, Godrèche C (1999) Phase ordering and persistence in a class of stochastic processes interpolating between the Ising and voter models. J Phys A 32:249–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Fudenberg D (1995) Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Q J Econ 110:93–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel I, Samuelson L, Shaked A (1998) Altruists, Egoists and Hooligans in a local interaction model. Am Econ Rev 88:157–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Frachebourg L, Krapivsky PL (1996) Exact results for kinetics of catalytic reactions. Phys Rev E 53:R3009–R3012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glauber RJ (1963) Time-dependent statistics of the Ising model. J Math Phys 4:294–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley R, Liggett T (1975) Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model. Ann Probab 3:643–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau D, Binder K (2005) A guide to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta A, Luck JM (1999) Models of competitive learning: complex dynamics, intermittent conversions, and oscillatory coarsening. Phys Rev E 60(5):5218–5230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4:e179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spirin V, Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2001) Freezing in Ising ferromagnets. Phys Rev E 65(016119):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirin V, Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2001) Fate of zero-temperature Ising ferromagnets. Phys Rev E 63(036118):1–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

G.M. would like to thank Nirmal Thyagu for helpful discussions in the course of this study. G.M. was supported by a grant from DST (Govt. of India) through the project “Generativity in Cognitive Networks.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurang Mahajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahajan, G., Mehta, A. Competing with oneself: introducing self-interaction in a model of competitive learning. Theory Biosci. 129, 271–282 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0111-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0111-y

Keywords