Skip to main content
Log in

Selection for male-enforced uniparental cytoplasmic inheritance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most sexually reproducing species, including humans, mitochondria and other cytoplasmic elements are uniparentally (usually maternally) inherited. This phenomenon is of broad interest as a mechanism for countering the proliferation of selfish mitochondria. Uniparental inheritance can be enforced either by the female gametes excluding male cytoplasm or male gametes excluding their own from the zygote. Previous studies have shown that male-enforced uniparental inheritance is unlikely to evolve as a primary mechanism, because unlike female enforcement, the positive linkage disequilibrium between the modifier for eliminating the gamete’s own mitochondria and a wild-type mitochondrial complement is broken from one generation to the next. However, it has been proposed that with a sufficiently high mutation rate and strong selection, elimination of the gamete’s own mitochondria could be favored by selection. In this article, a series of numerical simulations confirm that this is indeed the case, although the conditions where male enforcement is favored are quite restrictive. Specifically, in addition to a high mutation rate to selfish mitochondria and strong selection against them, the cost of uniparental inheritance must be negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birky CW (1995) Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11331–11338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt A, Trivers R (2006) Genes in conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1981) Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J Theor Biol 89:83–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faure S, Noyer J-L, Carreel F, Horry J-P, Bakry F, Lanaud C (1994) Maternal inheritance of chloroplast genome and paternal inheritance of mitochondrial genomes in bananas. Curr Genet 25:265–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. The Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings IM (1992) Population genetic aspects of deleterious cytoplasmic genomes and their effect on the evolution of sexual reproduction. Genet Res 59:215–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra RF (1990) Evolution of uniparental inheritance of cytoplasmic DNA. In: Maynard Smith J, Vida J (eds) Organizational constraints on the dynamics of evolution. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LD (1995) Selfish genetic elements and their role in evolution: the evolution of sex and some of what that entails. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 249:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Maruyama T (1966) The mutational load with epistatic selection on fitness. Genetics 54:1337–1351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov AS (1988) Deleterious mutations and the origin of sexual reproduction. Nature 336:435–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RJ, Horsinger KE, Jason RK (1994) Biparental inheritance of the chloroplast genome in Coreopsis. J Hered 85:171–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matlab (2007) The Mathworks Co, Natick

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale DB, Marshall KA, Sederoff RR (1989) Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA are paternally inherited in Sequioa sempervirens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9347–9349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randerson JP, Hurst LD (1999) Small sperm, uniparental inheritance, and selfish cytoplasmic elements: a comparison of two models. J Evol Biol 112:110–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears BB (1980) Elimination of plastids during spermatogenesis and fertilization in the plant kingdom. Plasmid 4:233–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strand MK, Copeland WC (2002) Measuring mtDNA mutation rates in S. cerevisiae using mtArg assay. Methods Mol Biol 197:1064–3745

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatley JM, John JM, Whatley FR (1979) From extracellular to intracellular: the establishment of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:165–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zouros E, Ball AO, Saavedra C, Freeman KR (1994) An unusual type of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7463–7467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Austin Burt for helpful discussion, particularly concerning the role of epistasis. M. Shpak was supported by URI Grant 14-6485-9651.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Shpak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sreedharan, V., Shpak, M. Selection for male-enforced uniparental cytoplasmic inheritance. Theory Biosci. 129, 295–306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0113-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0113-9

Keywords