Skip to main content
Log in

The Haeckel reception in Sweden

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Haeckel reception in different European countries has received some attention from historians of biology, but the reception in Scandinavia remains relatively unknown. We have found letters to and from Haeckel to Swedish scientists and students in the Ernst Haeckel House in Jena and in the archives of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (RSAS) in Stockholm. Here we present correspondence with Wilhelm Leche, Sven Lovén, and M. G. Retzius, all prominent scientists in Stockholm at the time and members of the RSAS. Most letters cover scientific matters such as the biogenetic law, or are concerned with practical matters such as loans of specimens. Sometimes also political issues are mentioned. In addition, we present a letter from Anton Nyström, the radical physician, in which he tells of his struggles with the church and the conservatives, and a letter from the explorer and geographer Sven Hedin, written in the midst of the First World War. Examples are also given of letters to Haeckel from students that were inspired by his world view as laid out in “Natural History of Creation”. In conclusion, Haeckel’s correspondence with his colleagues in Stockholm gives insights not only into how Haeckel’s ideas were received at the time, but also into the relationships between the Swedish scientists, including their conflicting political views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For further information see: https://haeckel-briefwechsel-projekt.uni-jena.de/.

References

  • Aescht E, Aubrecht G, Krausse E (eds) (1998) Welträtsel und Lebenswunder. Ernst Haeckel—Werk, Wirkung und Folgen. Stapfia 56. oberösterreiches Landesmuseum, Linz

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker PE (1990) Sozialdarwinismus. Wege ins Dritte Reich, Part II. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Rassismus, Antisemitismus und Völkischer Gedanke

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach O (ed) (1998) Ernst Haeckel: Kunstformen der Natur. Prestel, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach, O. (2001) Künstliche Kraftbrühe. Im Banne des Biomorphismus: Ernst Haeckel war der erste erfolgreiche Wissenschaftspriester”, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 8 October

  • Breidbach O (ed) (2006) Ernst Haeckel: Bildwelten der Natur. Prestel, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach O (ed) (2012) Ernst Haeckel: Kunstformen der Natur. Kunstformen aus dem Meer. Prestel, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann U (1996) Biologists under Hitler. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frängsmyr T (1964) Den unge Anton Nyström och positivismen. Lychnos 1963–64:72–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürst CM (1921) Magnus Gustaf Retzius, vol 19. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens årsbok, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel E (1866a) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, vol 2. Georg Reimer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel E (1866b) Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte. Georg Reimer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins M (1997) Social Darwinism in European and American thought, 1860–1945: nature as model and nature as threat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood N (2015) Haeckel’s embryos: images, evolution, and fraud. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U (2016) Geschichte der biologischen Anthropologie in Deutschland. Von den Anfängen bis in die Nachkriegszeit, 2nd edn. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U, Breidbach O (2005) Haeckel Korrespondenz: Übersicht über den Briefbestand des Ernst-Haeckel-Archivs. VWB-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U, Olsson L (2003) The history of comparative anatomy in Jena—an overview. Theory Biosci 122(2/3):109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U, Levit GS, Olsson L (2016) Haeckel reloaded: 150 Jahre “Biogenetisches Grundgesetz”. Biol unserer Zeit 46(3):190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kockerbeck C (1997) Die Schönheit des Lebendigen. Ästhetische Naturwahrnehmung im 19 Jahrhundert. Böhlau, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidforss af Geijerstam G (1945) Så minns jag Bengt Lidforss. Natur & Kultur, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöthlich R, Weber H et al (2006) “Substanzmonismus” und/oder “Energetik”: Der Briefwechsel von Ernst Haeckel und Wilhelm Ostwald (1910–1918). Zum 100. Jahrestag der Gründung des Deutschen Monistenbundes. VWB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Hossfeld U (2005) En översikt av den internationella Haeckelreceptionen och början till en kartläggning av Ernst Haeckels svenska korrespondens. Lychnos 2004:207–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Hossfeld U (2006) Netzwerke: die Korrespondenz von Ernst Haeckel nach Schweden. Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie 12:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2017) The “Biogenetic Law” in zoology: from Ernst Haeckel’s formulation to current approaches. Theory Biosci 136(1/2):19–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RJ (2007) Ernst Haeckel’s alleged anti-semitism and contributions to Nazi biology. Biol Theory 2:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RJ (2013) Was Hitler a Darwinian? Disputed questions in the history of evolutionary theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmann J (1990) Der Bruch mit der humanitären Tradition. Die Biologisierung der Ethik bei Ernst Haeckel und anderen Darwinisten seiner Zeit. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H (2000) Monistische und antimonistische Weltanschauung. Eine Auswahlbibliographie. VWB Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H, Di Bartolo M, Breidbach O (eds) (2008) Monismus um 1900. Organisation und Weltanschauung (= Jahrbuch für Europäische Wissenschaftskultur. Bd. 3 [2007]). Franz Steiner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziche P (ed) (2000) Monismus um 1900: Wissenschaftskultur und Weltanschauung. VWB Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm for their support of our research in their archives.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lennart Olsson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is a contribution to the Special Issue Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919): The German Darwin and his impact on modern biology. Guest Editors: U. Hossfeld, G. S. Levit, U. Kutschera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olsson, L., Hossfeld, U. The Haeckel reception in Sweden. Theory Biosci. 138, 119–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-019-00284-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-019-00284-4

Keywords

Navigation