Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-label feature selection based on information entropy fusion in multi-source decision system

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feature selection plays an important role in high-dimensional multi-source data, which can improve classification performance of learning algorithm. Most of existing multi-source information fusion focus on the single decision system without considering multi-source and multi-label problems together. Nevertheless, data from different sources along with multiple labels simultaneously are absolutely frequent in many real-world applications. For this issue, in this paper, a multi-source multi-label decision system is proposed, which has more than one decision label. To remove some redundant or irrelevant features in multi-source multi-label decision system, a feature selection algorithm based on positive region for multi-source multi-label data is explored, which uses the feature dependency carried on the fusion decision table. Finally, examples are introduced to elaborate the detail process of the proposed algorithm, and experimental results show the effective performance of the proposed algorithm on multi-source and multi-label data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu X, Zhu X, Wu GQ et al (2014) Data mining with big data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(1):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang YZ, Jin XL, Cheng XQ (2013) Networking big data:present and future. Chin J Comput 36(6):1125–1138

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao J, Guan X, Li X (2013) Power allocation based on genetic simulated annealing algorithm in cognitive radio networks. Chin J Electron 22(1):177–180

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Li CD, Sun ZQ, Luo ZM, Li SZ (2019) Towards a unified multi-source-based optimization framework for multi-label learning. Appl Soft Comput 76:425–435

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao J, Yang T, Gong Y, Wang J, Fu L (2013) Power control algorithm of cognitive radio based on non-cooperative game theory. China Commun 10(11):143–154

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poggio T, Smale S (2005) The mathematics of learning: dealing with data. Found Adv Data Min 180:1–19

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. Inf Sci 177(1):3–27

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian YH, Liang JY, Yao YY, Dang CY (2010) MGRS: a multigranulation rough set. Inf Sci 180:949–970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng F, Liu XY, Leoreanu-Fotea V, Jun YB (2011) Soft sets and soft rough sets. Inf Sci 181:1125–1137

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng F, Li CX, Davvaz B, Ali MI (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14(9):899–911

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaheen T, Mian B, Shabir M, Feng F (2019) A novel approach to decision analysis using dominance-based soft rough sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(3):954–962

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan MA, Banerjee M (2008) Formal reasoning with rough sets in multiple-source approximation systems. Int J Approx Reason 49:466–477

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Li TC, Pintado FDLP, Corchado JM, Bajo J (2017) Multi-source homogeneous data clustering for multi-target detection from cluttered background with misdetection. Appl Soft Comput 60:436–446

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hathaway RJ, Bezdek JC, Pedrycz W (1996) A parametric model for fusing heterogeneous fuzzy data. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(3):270–281

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grzymala-Busse JW (1991) Managing uncertainty in expert systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Grzymala-Busse JW (1992) LERS—a system for learning from examples based on rough sets. In: Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support, theory and decision library, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee J, Kim DW (2015) Fast multi-label feature selection based on information-theoretic feature ranking. Pattern Recognit 48:2761–2771

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo Y, Xu WH (2016) Attribute reduction in multi-source decision systems. Int Joint Conf Rough Sets 9920:558–568

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu WH, Li MM, Wang XZ (2017) Information fusion based on information entropy in fuzzy multi-source incomplete information system. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19:1200–1216

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang J, Li GR, Huang QM et al (2017) Joint feature selection and classification for multilabel learning. IEEE Trans Cybern 48(3):876–889

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Qian YH, Liang JY, Pedrycz W et al (2010) Positive approximation: an accelerator for attribute reduction in rough set theory. Artif Intell 174(9–10):597–618

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nan GF, Li QW, Dou RL, Liu J (2018) Local positive and negative correlation-based k-labelsets for multi-label classification. Neurocomputing 318:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qian YH, Liang JY (2008) Positive approximation and rule extracting in incomplete information systems. Int J Comput Sci Knowl Eng 2(1):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hu QH, Yu D et al (2006) Fuzzy probabilistic approximation spaces and their information measures. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(2):191–201

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li F, Miao DQ, Pedrycz W (2017) Granular multi-label feature selection based on mutual information. Pattern Recognit 67:410–423

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dasarathy BV (2004) Multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion: architecture, algorithms, and applications—a panoramic overview. In: Second IEEE international conference on computational cybernetics, Vienna

  27. Ribeiro RA, Falcão A, Mora A, Fonseca JM (2014) FIF: a fuzzy information fusion algorithm based on multi-criteria decision making. Knowl Based Syst 58:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sang B, Guo Y, Shi D, Xu WH (2018) Decision-theoretic rough set model of multi-source decision systems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1941–1954

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou X, Jiang P (2017) Variation source identification for deep hole boring process of cutting-hard workpiece based on multi-source information fusion using evidence theory. J Intell Manuf 28(2):255–270

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu WH, Yu JH (2017) A novel approach to information fusion in multi-source datasets: a granular computing viewpoint. Inf Sci 378:410–423

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Rauszer C (2005) Rough logic for multi-agent systems. In: International conference on logic at work. Knowledge representation and reasoning under uncertainty, vol 808, pp 161–181

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khan MA (2016) Formal reasoning in preference-based multiple-source rough set model. Inf Sci 334:122–143

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Mani A (2013) Towards logic’s of some rough perspectives of knowledge. Rough Sets Intell Syst Profr Zdzisław Pawlak Mem 43:419–444

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai JH, Wang WT, Q X (2013) An uncertainty measure for incomplete decision tables and its applications. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(4):1277–1289

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zheng YF, Shi HJ (2011) Attribute reduction algorithm based on relation coefficient and conditional information entropy. Comput Eng Appl 47(16):26–28

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wu SZ, Guo PZ (2011) Attribute reduction algorithm on rough set and information entropy and its application. Comput Eng 37(7):56–58

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wei W, Liang JY (2019) Information fusion in rough set theory: an overview. Inf Fusion 48:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  39. Battiti R (1994) Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(4):537–550

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hu QH, Zhang L, Zhang D, Pan W, An S, Pedrycz W (2011) Measuring relevance between discrete and continuous features based on neighborhood mutual information. Exp Syst Appl 38:10737–10750

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang X, Yang J, Teng XL, Xia WJ, Jensen R (2007) Feature selection based on rough sets and particle swarm optimization. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(4):459–471

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang ML, Zhou ZH (2014) A review on multi-label learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26:1819–1837

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu XZ, Zhou Z (2017) A unified view of multi-label performance measures. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning, vol 70, pp 3780–3788

  44. Demšr J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61966016 and 61502213), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20192BAB207018), the Scientific Research Project of Education department of Jiangxi Province (No. GJJ180200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Yang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, W., Yu, S., Yang, J. et al. Multi-label feature selection based on information entropy fusion in multi-source decision system. Evol. Intel. 13, 255–268 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00349-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-019-00349-9

Keywords

Navigation