Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-objective approach for solving transmission expansion planning problem considering wind power uncertainty

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Security-constrained transmission expansion planning (SCTEP) is a vital power system problem. In last years, to attain energy sustainability, wind power has received significant attention as one of the popular renewable energy resources. This paper solves multi-objective optimization of TEP considering uncertainty of wind power. The uncertainty is modelled by Weibull probability distribution function and Monte-Carlo simulation is employed to consider the uncertainty into the problem. In the problem, the objectives are investment cost of new lines and expected energy not supplied obtained by N-1 security constraint criterion. Since SCTEP is a complex, large-scale, mixed-integer and non-linear combinatorial optimization problem, multi-objective crow search algorithm and multi-objective particle swarm optimization are utilized to find Pareto front. On modified 24-bus IEEE system, the optimization framework is investigated and the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

\(f_{1} \left( x \right)\) :

Total investment cost

\(c_{i,j}\) :

Investment cost of adding a new line between buses i and j

\(n_{i,j}\) :

Number of added lines between buses i and j

EENS jk :

Expected energy not supplied by demand j due to contigency k

\(\Gamma_{jk}\) :

Involuntary load shedding of demand j due to contigency k

\(\rho_{k}\) :

Probability of contingency k

u k :

State of new component

\(\rho_{all} \) :

Probability of no contigency

FOR k :

Forced outage rate of component k

MTTF :

Mean time to failure

MTTR :

Mean time to repair

λ :

Outage rate

\(n_{i,j}^{0}\) :

Number of lines between buses i and j

\(P_{i,j}^{max}\) :

Maximum power flow between buses i and j

\(P_{i,j }\) :

Power flow between buses i and j

\(n_{i,j}^{max}\) :

Maximum number of lines which can be added between buses i and j

\(b_{i,j }\) :

Susceptance of the line between buses i and j

\(\theta_{i}\) :

Voltage phase angle at bus i

\(\theta_{j}\) :

Voltage phase angle at bus j

\(f\left( {v, c,k} \right)\) :

Weibull PDF

\(F\left( {v, c,k} \right)\) :

Weibull CDF

v :

Wind speed

k :

Shape parameter

c :

Scale parameter

P w :

Output power of wind generator

v rated :

Rated speed

v ci :

Cut-in wind speed

v co :

Cut-out wind speed

\(x_{i}^{iter}\) :

Current position of crow i

\(x_{i}^{iter + 1}\) :

New position of crow i

iter :

Iteration number

\(m_{j}^{iter}\) :

Memorized position of crow j

r :

Random number

\(m_{i}^{iter + 1}\) :

Memorized position of crow i at iteration iter + 1

References

  1. El-bages MS, Elsayed WT (2017) Social spider algorithm for solving the transmission expansion planning problem. Electric Power Syst Res 143:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baringo L, Baringo A (2017) A stochastic adaptive robust optimization approach for the generation and transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(1):792–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alaee S, Hooshmand R, Hemmati R (2016) Stochastic transmission expansion planning incorporating reliability solved using SFLA meta-heuristic optimization technique. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 2(2):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Han X, Zhao L, Wen J, Ai X, Liu J, Yang D (2017) Transmission network expansion planning considering the generators’ contribution to uncertainty accommodation. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 3(4):450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Wang J, Li Y, Wang X (2018) An extension of reduced disjunctive model for multi-stage security-constrained transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(1):1092–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez PV, Saraiva JT (2020) A two-stage strategy for security-constrained AC dynamic transmission expansion planning. Electric Power Syst Res 180:106167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu J, Zhao J, Dong Z (2017) Probabilistic transmission expansion planning for increasing wind power penetration. IET Renew Power Gener 11(6):837–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dehghan S, Amjady N, Conejo A (2017) Adaptive robust transmission expansion planning using linear decision rules. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(5):4024–4034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhan J, Chung C, Zare A (2017) A fast solution method for stochastic transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(6):4684–4695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutiérrez-Alcaraz G, González-Cabrera N, Gil E (2020) An efficient method for contingency-constrained transmission expansion planning. Electric Power Systems Research, Volume 182. Article 106208.

  11. Freitas PFS, Macedo LH, Romero R (2019) A strategy for transmission network expansion planning considering multiple generation scenarios. Electr Power Syst Res 172:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Armaghani S, Naghshbandy AH, Shahrtash SM (2020) A novel multi-stage adaptive transmission network expansion planning to countermeasure cascading failure occurrence. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst Volume 115. Article 105415

  13. Mortaz E, Valenzuela J (2019) Evaluating the impact of renewable generation on transmission expansion planning. Electric Power Syst Res 169:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taherkhani M, Hosseini SH, Javadi MS, Catalão JPS (Dece) ‘Scenario-based probabilistic multi-stage optimization for transmission expansion planning incorporating wind generation integration. Electric Power Syst Res 189:106601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrtash M, Kargarian A (2020) Risk-based dynamic generation and transmission expansion planning with propagating effects of contingencies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst Volume 118, Article 105762

  16. Liu D, Zhang S, Cheng H, Zhang X (2021) ‘Reducing wind power curtailment by risk-based transmission expansion planning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 124:106349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stock DS, Harms Y, Mende D, Hofmann L (2020) Robust nonlinear mathematical transmission expansion planning based on German electricity market simulation. Electr Power Syst Res 189:106685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Franken M, Alexander B, Barrios SH, Moser A (2020) Co-optimization of multi-stage transmission expansion planning and grid operation. Electr Power Syst Res 189:106686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maghouli P, Hosseini SH, Oloomi M, Shahidehpour M (2009) A multi-objective framework for transmission expansion planning in deregulated environments. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):1051–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akbari T, Rahimi-Kian A, Tavakoli M (2012) Security-constrained transmission expansion planning: a stochastic multi-objective approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arabali A, Ghofrani M, Etezadi-Amoli M, Fadali M, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2014) A Multi-objective transmission expansion planning framework in deregulated power systems with wind generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(6):3003–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ugranlı F, Karatepe E (2015) Multi-objective transmission expansion planning considering minimization of curtailed wind energy. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 65:348–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jadidoleslam M, Ebrahimi A, Latify MA (2017) Probabilistic transmission expansion planning to maximize the integration of wind power. Renew Energy 144:866–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moradi A, Alinejad-Beromi Y, Kiani K (2017) Multi-objective transmission expansion planning with allocation of fixed series compensation under uncertainties. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 27:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khakpoor M, Jafari-Nokandi M, Abdoos AA (2017) Dynamic generation and transmission expansion planning in the power market–based on a multiobjective framework. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 27:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim KJ, Park YM, Lee KY (1988) Optimal long term transmission expansion planning based on maximum principle. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3(4):1494–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aghaei J, Amjady N, Baharvandi A, Akbari MA (2014) Generation and transmission expansion planning: MILP–based probabilistic model. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(4):1592–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Justus CG, Mikhail A (1976) Height variation of wind speed and wind distributions statistics. Geophys Res Lett 3(5):261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulgen K, Hepbasli A (2002) Determination of Weibull parameters for wind energy analysis of Izmir. Turkey Int J Energy Res 26(6):495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lun IYF, Lam JC (2000) A study of Weibull parameters using long term wind observation. Renew Energy 20(2):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dorvol ASS (2002) Estimating wind speed distribution. Energy Convers Manag 43(17):2311–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rehman S, Halawani TO (1994) Statistical characteristics of wind in Saudi Arabia. Renew Energy 4(8):949–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoda Zamani, Mohammad H, Nadimi-Shahraki, Amir H, Gandomi CCSA (2019) Conscious neighborhood-based crow search algorithm for solving global optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput Volume 85, Article 105583.

  34. Mohammadi F, Abdi H (2018) A modified crow search algorithm (MCSA) for solving economic load dispatch problem. Appl Soft Comput 71:51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fang C, Hill DJ (2013) A new strategy for transmission expansion in competitive electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ugranli F, Karatepe E (2016) Transmission expansion planning for wind turbine integrated power systems considering contingency. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(2):1476–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva IJ, Rider MJ, Romero R, Garcia AV, Murari CA (2005) Transmission network expansion planning with security constraints. IET Gener Trans Distrib 152(6):828–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rathore C, Roy R (2016) Impact of wind uncertainty, plug-in-electric vehicles and demand response program on transmission network expansion planning. Electr Power Energy Syst 75:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Askarzadeh.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 5 Transmission line data for modified IEEE 24-bus system (base = 100 MVA)

5,

Table 6 Transformer data for modified IEEE 24-bus system (base = 100 MVA)

6 and

Table 7 Data of new lines added to existing branches of modified IEEE 24-bus system (base = 100 MVA) [23]

7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashedi, B., Askarzadeh, A. A multi-objective approach for solving transmission expansion planning problem considering wind power uncertainty. Evol. Intel. 15, 497–511 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00525-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00525-2

Keywords