Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distributed context aware collaborative filtering approach for P2P service selection and recovery in wireless mesh networks

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the evolution of large number of social networking sites in which various users share the information at various levels in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) manner, there is a need of efficient P2P collaborative mechanisms to achieve efficiency and accuracy at each level. To achieve high level of accuracy and scalability, a distributed collaborative filtering (CF) approach for P2P service selection and recovery is proposed in this paper. The proposed approach is different from the traditional centralized approaches as both user and network views are modelled and an estimation of the service recovery time is included if some of the services are failed during execution. A novel Context Aware P2P Service Selection and Recovery (CAPSSR) algorithm is proposed. To filter the relevant contents for user needs, a new Distributed Filtering Metric (DFM) is included in the algorithm which selects the contents based upon the user input. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated with traditional centralized algorithm with respect to scalability and accuracy. The results obtained show that the proposed approach is better than the existing approaches in terms of accuracy and scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu Z, Qu W, Li H, Xie C (2010) A hybrid collaborative filtering recommendation mechanism for P2P networks. Futur Gener Comput Syst 26(8):1409–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz F, Wang X, Wang W (2005) Wireless mesh networks: a survey. Comput Netw 47(4):445–487

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Juan R, SergioF O, Jose P, Roc M, Esunly M, Dolors R (2010) A communication infrastructure to ease the development of mobile collaborative applications. J Netw Comput Appl 34(6):1883–1893

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee W, Tseng S, Shieh W (2010) Collaborative real-time traffic information generation and sharing framework for the intelligent transportation system. Inform Sci 180:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Resnick P, Iacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J (1994) GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

  6. Hao M, Irwin K, Lyu M (2007) Effective missing data prediction for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2007, 39–46

  7. Derry S, David W, Barry S (2003) Preserving recommender accuracy and diversity in sparse datasets. In: FLAIRS Conference 2003 139–143

  8. Rong H, Yansheng L (2006) A hybrid user and item-based collaborative filtering with smoothing on sparse data. In proceeding of 16th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Tel existence. 2006, 184–189

  9. Marc S, Pedro G (2010) eSciGrid: a P2P-based e-science Grid for scalable and efficient data sharing. Futur Gener Comput Syst 26(5):704–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, De Vries AP, Reinders MJT (2006) A user_item relevance model for log based collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the European Conference on IR Research. Springer, London, 2006, 37–48

  11. Wang J, De Vries AP, Reinders MJT (2006) Unifying user-based and item based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York, 2006, 501–508

  12. Wang J, De Vries AP, Reinders MJT (2008) Unified relevance models f or rating prediction in collaborative filtering. ACM Trans Inf Syst 26(3):1–42

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Riedl JT, Terveen LG (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):5–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan PB, Bridge D (2006) Collaborative recommending using formal concept analysis. Knowl-Based Syst 19(5):309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pu P, Chen L (2007) Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowl-Based Syst 20(6):542–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giaglis GM, Lekakos G (2006) Improving the prediction accuracy of recommendation algorithms: approaches anchored on human factors. Interact Comput 18(3):410–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuyuki I, Quan TK, Shinichi H (2006) Improving accuracy of recommender systems by clustering items based on stability of user similarity. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce 2006

  18. Manolopoulus Y, Nanopoulus A, Papadopoulus AN, Symeonidis P (2007) Collaborative recommender systems: combining effectiveness and efficiency. Expert Syst Appl 34:2995–3013

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernández F, Gaudioso E (2008) Evaluation of recommender systems: a new approach. Expert Syst Appl 35:790–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Su A, Yang S, Hwang Y, Zhang J (2010) A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Comput Educ 55:752–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liaw SS, Chen GD, Huang HM (2008) Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Comput Educ 50:950–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Google, /http://www.google.com/intl/es_ALL/analytics/S; 2009

  23. WebTrends, /http://www.webtrends.com/S; 2009

  24. Rafael D, Crescencio B, Manuel O (2011) A model-based framework to automate the analysis of users’ activity in collaborative systems. J Netw Comput Appl 34(4):1200–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Landsiedel O, Gotz S, Wehrle K (2006) Towards scalable mobility in distributed hash tables. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing, 2006

  26. Ratnasamy S, Karp B, Shenker S, Estrin D, Govindan R, Yin L, Yu F (2003) Data-centric storage in sensornets with GHT, a geographic hash table. Mob Netw Appl 8(4):427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Desnoyers P, Ganesan D, Shenoy P (2005) TSAR: a two tier sensor storage architecture using interval skip graphs. Proc. ACM SenSys, Nov. 2005

  28. Galluccio L, Morabito G, Palazzo S, Pellegrini M, Renda ME (2007) Georoy: a location-aware enhancement to Viceroy peer-to- peer algorithm. Comput Netw 51(8):379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Asaad Al, Gopalakrishnan S, Leung V (2009) Peer-to-peer file sharing over wireless mesh networks. In Proc. of Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, 2009, Victoria, BC, Canada, 23–26 Aug., 697–702

  30. Alasaad A, Gopalakrishnan S, Leung V (2011) Extending P2PMesh: topology-aware schemes for efficient peer-to-peer data sharing in wireless mesh networks Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing 2011

  31. Canali C, Renda ME, Santi P (2008) Evaluating load balancing in peer-to-peer resource sharing algorithms for wireless mesh networks Proc. IEEE MeshTech 603–609

  32. Canali C, Renda ME, Santi P (2010) Enabling peer-to-peer resource sharing in wireless mesh networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 9(3):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bobadilla J, Serradilla F, Bernal J (2010) A new collaborative filtering metric that improves the behaviour of recommender systems. Knowl-Based Syst 23(5):20–528

    Google Scholar 

  34. Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence 43–52, 1998

  35. Chih-Ping W, Chin-Sheng Y, Han-Wei H (2008) A collaborative filtering based approach to personalized document clustering. Decis Support Syst 45(3):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab, India

    Neeraj Kumar

  2. Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, La Trobe University, Beth Gleeson Building Room 138, Melbourne, Australia, 3086

    Naveen Chilamkurti

  3. RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, Cesson-Sévigné, France

    Jong-Hyouk Lee

Authors
  1. Neeraj Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naveen Chilamkurti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jong-Hyouk Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Chilamkurti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Chilamkurti, N. & Lee, JH. Distributed context aware collaborative filtering approach for P2P service selection and recovery in wireless mesh networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 5, 350–362 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-012-0156-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-012-0156-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation