Skip to main content
Log in

BufferBank: A distributed cache infrastructure for peer-to-peer application

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems generate a major fraction of the current Internet traffic which significantly increase the load on ISP networks. To mitigate these negative impacts, many previous works in the literature have proposed caching of P2P traffic. But very few have considered designing a distributed caching infrastructure in the edge network. This paper demonstrates that a distributed caching infrastructure is more suitable than traditional proxy cache servers which cache data in disk, and it is viable to use the memory of users in the edge network as the cache space. This paper presents the design and evaluation of a distributed network cache infrastructure for P2P application, called BufferBank. BufferBank provides a number of application interfaces for P2P applications to make full use of the cache space. Three-level mapping is introduced and elaborated to improve the reliability and security of this distributed cache mechanism. Our measurement results suggest that BufferBank can decrease the data obtaining delay, compared with traditional P2P cache server based on disk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gummadi KP et al (2003) Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. ACM SIGOPS Oper Syst Rev 37:314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karagiannis T, Broido A, Brownlee N, Claffy KC, Faloutsos M (2004) Is P2P dying or just hiding? IEEE Glob Telecommun Conf GLOBECOM 3:1532–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karagiannis T, Rodriguez P, Papagiannaki K (2005) Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement IMC, vol 1

  4. Alimi R, Pasko D, Popkin L, Wang Y, Yang Y (2008) P4P: provider portal for P2P applications. Control 38:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bindal R et al (2006) Improving traffic locality in BitTorrent via biased neighbor selection. In: 26th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems ICDCS06 06, p 66

  6. Wierzbicki A, Leibowitz N, Ripeanu M, Wozniak R (2004) Cache replacement policies revisited: the case of P2P traffic. In: IEEE international symposium on cluster computing and the grid CCGrid, pp 182–189

  7. Shen G, Wang Y, Xiong Y, Zhao BY, Zhang Z-L (2007) HPTP: relieving the tension between ISPs and P2P. Work 34:283–304

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saleh O, Hefeeda M (2006) Modeling and caching of peer-to-peer traffic. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on network protocols, pp 249–258

  9. Hefeeda M, Hsu C-H, Mokhtarian K (2011) Design and evaluation of a proxy cache for peer to peer traffic. IEEE Trans Comput 60:1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu K, Zhang M, Liu J, Qin Z, Ye M (2010) Proxy caching for peer-to-peer live streaming. Comput Networks 54:1229–1241

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Leibowitz N, Bergman A, Ben-Shaul R, Shavit A (2002) Are file swapping networks cacheable? Characterizing P2P traffic. In: Proceedings of the 7th Int WWW caching workshop

  12. Liu Y, Yu S (2005) Streaming media delivery with proxy cache for heterogeneous clients. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE workshop on multimedia signal processing

  13. Chang SH, Chang RI, Ho JM, Oyang YJ (2007) A priority selected cache algorithm for video relay in streaming applications. IEEE Trans Broadcast 53:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen S, Shen B, Wee S, Zhang X (2003) Adaptive and lazy segmentation based proxy caching for streaming media delivery. In: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on network and operating systems support for digital audio and video NOSSDAV 03, p 22

  15. Cui YCY, Li BLB, Nahrstedt K (2004) OStream: asynchronous streaming multicast in application-layer overlay networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 22:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hefeeda M, Habib A, Botev B, Xu D, Bhargava B (2003) PROMISE: peer-to-peer media streaming using collectcast. In: Proceedings of ACM multimedia. Area, pp 45–54

  17. Cheng B, Stein L, Jin H, Liao X, Zhang Z (2008) GridCast: improving peer sharing for P2P VoD. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl 4:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ongaro D, Rumble SM, Stutsman R, Ousterhout J, Rosenblum M (2011) Fast crash recovery in ramcloud. In: SOSP ’11, pp 29–41

  19. Huang C, Li J, Ross KW (2007) Peer-assisted VoD: making internet video distribution cheap. In: International peer to peer symposium IPTPS, vol 7, pp 1–6

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by a grant from the Major State Basic Research Development Programs of China (973 Programs) (No.2009CB320503 and No.2012CB315906), and Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development (863 Programs) (No.2011AA01A101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, B., Sun, Z., Chen, H. et al. BufferBank: A distributed cache infrastructure for peer-to-peer application. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 7, 485–496 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-012-0165-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-012-0165-3

Keywords

Navigation