Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water rippling shaped clustering strategy for efficient performance of software define wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The routing protocols are the hot areas to manage the network quality-of-service (QoS), viz., energy consumption, lifetime, network design and packet overhead. Network optimization relies on different calibers of decision: to discuss the network parameters meticulously for overall network improvement. Thus several criteria are proposed which fixate on energy conservation, architecture design, etc. to implicitly or explicitly amend the network performance. We propose a novel strategy named as Water-Rippling Shaped Clustering (WARIS) is a hybrid approach applies to cluster the large-scale software define wireless sensor network, which resembles the shape of water rippling. Major achievements are improved cluster design, energy aware cluster head (CH) selection method and reducing re-clustering overhead. The centrally controlled layer design locally restricted clustered design, and then cluster member selection in WARIS gives better performance as compared to the other two state of the art competitors MCDA and EELBCRP. The to-and-fro message communication between the deployed nodes and BS for exchanging parametric values and making decisions makes this cluster design process lengthy. Load management is done during the process cluster size formation which improves the network performance. Performance simulations illustrate that WARIS is a better choice to implement over wireless sensor networks, predicated on energy consumption and set-up completion time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deligeorges S, Lavey C, Cakiades G, George J, Wang Y, Ez FN, Doyle F (2015) A mobile acoustic sensor fusion network using biologically inspired sensors and synchronization. In: 18th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion), 2015, Washington, DC

  2. Sanctis MD, Cianca E, Araniti G, Bisio I, Prasad R (2016) Satellite communications supporting internet of remote things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Naeimi S, Chow C-O, Ishii H (2013) Directional multi-hop clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput 14(02):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jabbar S, Minhas AA, Paul A, Rho S (2014) MCDA: multilayer cluster designing algorithm for network lifetime improvement of homogenous wireless sensor networks. J Supercomput 11227

  5. Jabbar S, Minhas AA, Paul A, Rho S (2014) E-MCDA: extended - multilayer cluster designing algorithm for network lifetime improvement of homogenous wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2014

  6. Diwakar M, Kumar S (2012) An energy-efficient level based clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor. Int J Adv Smart Sens Netw Sys (IJASSN), 2(2)

  7. Heinzelman W, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: proceedings of the 33rd international conference on system sciences, Hawaii

  8. Ye M, Li C, Chen G, Wu J (2007) An energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks. Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks Journal 3:99–119

    Google Scholar 

  9. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 3(4):366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindsey S, Raghavendra C (2002) PEGASIS: power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In: Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana

  11. Yassein MB, Al-zou'bi A, Khamayseh Y, Mardini W (2009) Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network 03(02)

  12. Jabbar S, Butt AE, Najm-us-Sehr, Minhas AA (2011) TLPER: threshold based load balancing protocol for energy efficient routing in WSN. In: The 13th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT’11), Seoul, South Korea

  13. Wang D (2010) Power-mitigating scheme for Clusterheads in wireless sensor networks. Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks Journal 9:239–253

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu Z, Cao L, Liu T, Chen L, Chen C (2015) DARC: a distributed and adaptive routing protocol in cluster-based wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2015:14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shah SBH, Zhe C, Fuliang Y (2017) OPEN: optimized path planning algorithm with energy efficiency and extending network-lifetime in WSN, CIT. J Comput Inf Technol 25(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim J-W, In J-S, Hur K, Kim J-W, Eom D-S (2010) An intelligent agent-based routing structure for mobile sinks in WSNs. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 56(4):2310–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Meng C, Liang T, Heng W (2016) Multiple Base stations cooperation: a novel clustering algorithm and its energy efficiency. Wirel Pers Commun 86:351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar V, Kumar S (2016) Position-based beaconless routing in wireless sensor. Wirel Pers Commun 86:1061–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rawat P et al (2014) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. J Supercomput 68(1):1–48

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh S, Chand S, Kumar B (2016) Energy efficient clustering protocol using fuzzy logic for heterogeneous WSNs. Wirel Pers Commun 86:451–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jang S, Kim H-Y, Kim N-U, Chung T-M (2011) Energy-efficient clustering scheme with concentric hierarchy. In: IEEE Int. RF micro. Conf. (RFM)

  22. Mehta M, Pandya A (2012) A novel energy-efficient routing approach using multipath ring routing and clustering for WSN. In: ACM CUBE

  23. Muruganathan SD, Ma DC, Bhasin R, Fapojuwo A (2005) A centralized energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Radio Communications 43:S8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabbar S, Aziz MZ, Minhas AA, Hussain D (2010) PTAL: power tuning anchors localization algorithm for wireless ad-hoc micro sensors network. Bradford, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awais Ahmad.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection: Special Issue on Software Defined Networking: Trends, Challenges and Prospective Smart Solutions Guest Editors: Ahmed E. Kamal, Liangxiu Han, Sohail Jabbar, and Liu Lu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, S.B.H., Chen, Z., Yin, F. et al. Water rippling shaped clustering strategy for efficient performance of software define wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 12, 371–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-017-0591-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-017-0591-3

Keywords

Navigation