Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Lightweight authentication and matrix-based key agreement scheme for healthcare in fog computing

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Healthcare in fog computing is a novel topic in recent year. With the development of technology, it is a pressing issue to accomplish the secure healthcare in fog computing. Moreover, how to ensure the security and efficiency of the transmission healthcare data in open channel is a challenge to be solved. In this paper, a lightweight authentication and matrix-based key agreement scheme is proposed to support the communication of multi parties in fog computing. On the one hand, the lightweight authentication technology is needed to verify the identity of multi-parties that assure the facticity of communication parties in the open channel. On the other hand, using the matrix-based key agreement technology encrypts the healthcare data and uploads to the cloud server with the aid of the doubly-linked cyclic (DLC) tables. The security analysis shows that the proposed scheme is secure to transmit the data for healthcare. The performance analysis shows that the proposed scheme reduces the communication cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu N, Craddock I, Diethe T et al (2015) Bridging e-health and the internet of things: the SPHERE project[J]. IEEE Intell Syst 30(4):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen J, Zhou T, Chen X, Li J, Susilo W (2018) Anonymous and traceable group data sharing in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 13(4):912–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen S-L, Nie J, Lin T-L, Chung R-L, Hsia C-H, Liu Z-Y, Wu H-X (2018) VLSI implementation of an ultra low-cost and low-power image compressor for wireless camera networks. J Real-Time Image Proc 14(4):803–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsia C-H, Dai Y-J, Chen S-L, Lin T-L, Shen J (2018) A gait sequence analysis for IP camera using a modified LBP. Journal of Internet Technology (JIT) 19(2):451–458

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shen J, Zhou T, He D, Zhang Y, Sun X, Xiang Y (2017) Block design-based key agreement for group data sharing in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2017.2725953

  6. Vasilakos AV, Vasilakos AV, Vasilakos AV et al (2017) Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: a survey[J]. ACM Comput Surv 50(3):32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shen J, Shen J, Chen X, Huang X, Susilo W (2017) An efficient public auditing protocol with novel dynamic structure for cloud data. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 12(10):2402–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsia C-H (2018) New verification method for finger-vein recognition system. IEEE Sensors J 18(2):790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsia C-H, Guo J-M, Wu C-S (2017) Finger-vein recognition based on parametric-oriented corrections. Multimedia Tools and Applications (MTAP) 76(23):25179–25196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang D, Wang N, Wang P, Qing S (2015) Preserving privacy for free: efficient and provably secure two-factor authentication scheme with user anonymity[J]. Inf Sci 321:162–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SS (2016) Mutual authentication scheme between biosensor device and data manager in healthcare environment[J]. J Supercomput 72(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen J, Wang C, Lai CF, Wang A, Chao HC (2016) Direction density-based secure routing protocol for healthcare data in incompletely predictable networks[J]. IEEE Access 4:9163–9173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang C, Shen J, Liu Q, Ren Y, Li T (2018) A novel security scheme based on instant encrypted transmission for internet of things[J]. Security and Communication Networks (SCN) 2018:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3680851

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shen J, Wang C, Wang A, Ji S, Zhang Y (2018) A searchable and verifiable data protection scheme for scholarly big data. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (TETC). https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2018.2830368

  15. Cilardo A, Coppolino L, Mazzocca N, Romano L (2006) Elliptic curve cryptography engineering[J]. Proc IEEE 94(2):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi W, Gong P (2013) A new user authentication protocol for wireless sensor networks using elliptic curves cryptography. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2013(730831):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shen J, Shen J, Lai C-F, Liu Q, Zhou T (2018) Cloud based data protection in anonymously controlled SDN. Security and Communication Networks (SCN) 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9845426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barua R, Dutta R, Sarkar P (2003) Extending Joux’s protocol to multi party key agreement. In: International Conference on Cryptology in India, vol 2904. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 205–217

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Li J, Weng J, Ma J, Lou W (2016) Verifiable computation over large database with incremental updates. IEEE Trans Comput 65(10):3184–3195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen J, Liu D, Bhuiyan MZA, Shen J, Sun X, Castiglione A (2017) Secure verifiable database supporting efficient dynamic operations in cloud computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (TETC). https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2776402

  21. Xu J, Xue K, Yang Q, Hong P (2018) PSAP: pseudonym-based secure authentication protocol for NFC applications[J]. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 64(1):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ni J, Lin X, Shen XS (2018) Efficient and Secure service-oriented authentication supporting network slicing for 5G-Enabled IoT. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 36(3):644–657

  23. Madhusudhan R, Mittal RC (2012) Dynamic ID-based remote user password authentication schemes using smart cards: a review. J Netw Comput Appl 35(4):1235–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen J, Liu D, He D, Huang X, Xiang Y (2017) Algebraic signatures-based data integrity auditing for efficient data dynamics in cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing (T-SUSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSUSC.2017.2781232

  25. Chen X, Li J, Ma J, Tang Q, Lou W (2014) New algorithms for secure outsourcing of modular exponentiations. IEEE Transactions on Parallel & Distributed Systems(TPDS) 25(9):2386–2396

  26. Chuang MC, Lee JFTEAM (2011) Trust-extended authentication mechanism for vehicular ad hoc networks[C]//. International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks. International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet):1758–1761

  27. Shi W, Gong P. A new user authentication protocol for wireless sensor networks using elliptic curves cryptography[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (IJDSN), 2013, (2013–4–11), 2013, 2013(730831):51–59

  28. Tan Z. Secure delegation-based authentication for telecare medicine information systems[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, PP(99):1–1, 6, 26091, 26110

  29. Hwang S J, You C H. A delegation-based Unlinkable authentication protocol for portable communication systems with non-repudiation[J]. 2013

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shen J, Zhou T, Wei F et al (2018) Privacy-preserving and lightweight key agreement protocol for V2G in the social internet of things[J]. IEEE Internet Things J 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2775248

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61672295, No. 61672290, and No. 61772280, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security under Grant No. GCIS201715, the CICAEET fund, and the PAPD fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer & Software, Jiangsu Engineering Center of Network Monitoring, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China

    Jian Shen, Huijie Yang, Anxi Wang, Tianqi Zhou & Chen Wang

  2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security, Guilin, China

    Jian Shen, Huijie Yang, Anxi Wang & Chen Wang

  3. State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Institute of Information Engineering, Beijing, China

    Jian Shen & Tianqi Zhou

Authors
  1. Jian Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huijie Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anxi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tianqi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Shen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, J., Yang, H., Wang, A. et al. Lightweight authentication and matrix-based key agreement scheme for healthcare in fog computing. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 12, 924–933 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0696-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0696-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation