Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The efficacy of handoff strategy based spectrum allocation using TSB-MFO for D2D and CU communications

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Device-to-Device (D2D) based communication plays a major part in improving the 5G network’s system capacity. In pursuance of accomplishing this, effective resource and power allocation algorithms have to be designed for D2D users. As D2D users are considered as secondary users, their interference with cellular users (CUs) should not restrict the communication which is performed based on CU. Most of the existing methodologies performed on bandwidth allocation assume full Channel State Information (CSI) at the base station (BS), which resulted in uncertainty resource allocation. Hence to resolve this, the proposed scheme is developed with an efficient handoff strategy based on bandwidth allocation using Thompson Sampling Bandwidth (TSB) and Magnetic Force Optimization (MFO) for D2D and CU communications along with guaranteed QoS constraint. Here, the available free bandwidth is selected using the TSB technique which in turn is based on overall data rate, level of interference and number of CU users. In this, Magnetic Force optimization (MFO) is utilized for base station selection. This is done based on signal strength variation, coverage area between user and base station, and bandwidth capacity. Thus it results in guaranteed QoS constraint, i.e., parameters like Packet delay; throughput, data rate and reduction in allocated sub-carriers are attained. Finally, the simulation outcomes are performed and the results are estimated in terms of average delay, throughput, node deployment, and data rate. Therefore, the comparative analysis is carried out between the attained outcomes with that of the existing techniques to prove the efficacy of the proposed TSB-MFO technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emara M et al (2018) Optimal caching in 5G networks with opportunistic spectrum access. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 17:4447–4461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang C et al (2018) Energy-efficient cooperative spectrum sensing with reporting errors in hybrid spectrum sharing CRNs. IEEE Access 6:48391–48402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. da Mata SH, Guardieiro PR (2017) Resource allocation for the LTE uplink based on Genetic Algorithms in mixed traffic environments. Comput Commun 107:125–137

  4. Deotale N et al (2018) Optimal transmit antenna selection for LTE system using self-adaptive grey wolf optimization. Multiagent Grid Syst 14:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmar S, Mishra K (2019) Use of Moth Flame Optimization for improvement in wireless communication systems

  6. Lee YL et al (2017) Multi-objective resource allocation for LTE/LTE-A femtocell/HeNB networks using ant colony optimization. Wirel Pers Commun 92:565–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahuja K et al (2016) Network selection based on available link bandwidth in multi-access networks. Digit Commun Netw 2:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Modi N et al (2017) QoS driven channel selection algorithm for cognitive radio network: Multi-user multi-armed bandit approach. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 3:49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian Z et al (2019) Distributed NOMA-Based Multi-Armed Bandit Approach for Channel Access in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 8:1112–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nandakumar S et al (2019) Efficient spectrum handoff using hybrid priority queuing model in cognitive radio networks. Wirel Pers Commun 108:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mir U, Munir A (2018) An adaptive handoff strategy for cognitive radio networks. Wirel Netw 24:2077–2092

  12. Safavi SE, Subbalakshmi K (2015) Effective bandwidth for delay tolerant secondary user traffic in multi-PU, multi-SU dynamic spectrum access networks. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 1:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Falcão MR et al (2018) A flexible-bandwidth model with channel reservation and channel aggregation for three-layered Cognitive Radio Networks. Comput Netw 135:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Darabi M et al (2018) Packet size adjustment for minimizing the average delay in buffer-aided cognitive machine-to-machine networks. Comput Electr Eng 68:298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Darabi M et al (2017) Adaptive mode selection in cognitive buffer-aided full-duplex relay networks with imperfect self-interference cancellation for power and delay limited cases,“ in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp 918–923

  16. Mashoodha P, Kumar KV (2016) Risk and QoE driven channel allocation in CRN. Procedia Technol 24:1629–1634

  17. Gahane L et al (2017) An improved energy detector for mobile cognitive users over generalized fading channels. IEEE Trans Commun 66:534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu W et al (2017) Statistical delay QoS driven energy efficiency and effective capacity tradeoff for uplink multi-user multi-carrier systems. IEEE Trans Commun 65:3494–3508

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khakurel S et al (2018) Qos-aware utility-based resource allocation in mixed-traffic multi-user ofdm systems. IEEE Access 6:21646–21657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu W et al (2016) Tradeoff analysis and joint optimization of link-layer energy efficiency and effective capacity toward green communications. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15:3339–3353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Farooq-I-Azam M et al (2018) Location Assisted Subcarrier and Power Allocation in Underlay Mobile Cognitive Radio Networks. In: 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp 1–6

  22. Khuntia P, Hazra R (2018) Resource sharing for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular network. In: 2018 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT), pp 1–5

  23. Ferdouse L et al (20170) Interference and throughput aware resource allocation for multi-class D2D in 5G networks. Iet Commun 11:1241–1250

  24. Ahmed E et al (2017) Social-aware resource allocation and optimization for D2D communication. IEEE Wirel Commun 24:122–129

  25. Mohan D, Amalanathan GM (2018) A survey on long term evolution scheduling in data mining. Wirel Pers Commun 102:2363–2387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Omitola OO, Srivastava VM (2018) Group handover strategy for mobile relays in LTE-A networks. J Commun 13

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering , Vellore Institute of Technology , Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India

    Divya Mohan & Geetha Mary Amalanathan

Authors
  1. Divya Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geetha Mary Amalanathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geetha Mary Amalanathan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection: Special Issue on P2P Computing for Beyond 5G Network and Internet-of-Everything

Guest Editors: Prakasam P, Ajayan John, Shohel Sayeed

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohan, D., Amalanathan, G.M. The efficacy of handoff strategy based spectrum allocation using TSB-MFO for D2D and CU communications. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 14, 279–295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-00935-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-00935-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation