Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemic and transmission priority based data dissemination model in vehichular adhoc networks (VANETs)

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicular Adhoc Networks (VANETs) is one of the prominent and most important technologies that have reached a milestone in today’s modern world. One of the important key functions of VANET is known to be data dissemination that attracted most researchers to deal the problem and technical aspects towards its development. As collective perception technique is used by VANETs for expanding the perceptual range for the road traffic by sharing the sensor data regarding the objects in region using Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication. However, hidden terminal problem and packet collision occurs due to high vehicle density which makes data dissemination more difficult to deliver its messages which contains sensor data. In this paper, the proposed Epidemic and Transmission Control Priority (ETCP) based data dissemination model is presented. The proposed technique is used for controlling the transmission frequency of the sensor data or messages to avoid collision and to find the infected number of vehicles which are affected by the message without network overload. Furthermore, the vehicles are selected automatically with high probability for broadcasting sensor data. The simulation results of proposed ETCP algorithm is compared with existing Epic and Condensation Based Forwarding (CBF) algorithms, where transmission delay is as low as 214 millisecond which is lower when compared to other existing models. Packet delivery ratio of the proposed model is 99.12% which is significantly higher when compared to other existing models. The performance evaluation shows that the proposed model can deliberately avoid collision accidents and minimize the overhead and delay by comparing with other existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang D, Delgrossi L IEEE 802.11p: Towards an International Standard forWireless Access in Vehicular Environments. In Proceedings of the VTC Spring 2008—IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Singapore, 11–14 May 2008

  2. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond Seri A 115:700–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunther H-J, Trauer O, Wolf L The Potential of Collective Perception in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks, In 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), IEEE, Dec. 2015

  4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2017) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; V2V communications. Fed Regist 82(8):3854–4019

    Google Scholar 

  5. Torrent-Moreno M, Santi P, Hartenstein H Distributed fair transmit power adjustment for vehicular ad hoc networks, IEEE SECON2006, pp.39–48, 2006

  6. Sommer C, Tonguz OK, Dressler F (May 2011) Traffic information systems: efficient message dissemination via adaptive beaconing. IEEE Commun Mag 49(5):173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nzouonta J, Rajgure N, Wang G, Borcea C (2009) Vanet routing on city roads using real-time vehicular traffic information. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 58(7):3609–3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eiza MH, Ni Q, Owens T, Min G (2013) Investigation of routing reliability of vehicular ad hoc networks. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2013:179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Z, Boukerche A, Pazzi R (2011) A novel multi-hop clustering scheme for vehicular adhoc networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on mobility management and wireless access (pp. 19–26). ACM, Miami

  10. Haerri J, Filali F, Bonnet C. (2006) Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in vanets urban environments under realistic mobility patterns. In Proceedings 5th IFIP mediterranean ad-hoc networking workshop, Lipari, Italy

  11. Liu H, Yang L, Zhang Y (2015) Improved AODV routing protocol based on restricted broadcasting by communication zones in large-scale VANET. Arab J Sci Eng 40(3):857–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Najafzadeh S, Ithnin N, Razak SA, Karimi R (2014) BSM: broadcasting of safety messages in vehicular ad hoc networks. Arab J Sci Eng 39(2):777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen W-H, Pang A-C, Pang A-C, Chiang C-T F (2010) Cross-layer cooperative routing for vehicular networks. In Proceedings. IEEE international computer symposium, China, December 2010 (pp. 67–72)

  14. Shaik S, Venkata Ratnam D, Bhandari BN (2018) An efficient cross layer routing protocol for safety message dissemination in VANETs with reduced routing cost and delay using IEEE 802.11P. Wirel Pers Commun 100(4):1765–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveira R, Montez C, Boukerche A, Wangham MS (2017) Reliable data dissemination protocol for VANET traffic safety applications. Ad Hoc Netw 63:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rayeni MS, Hafid A, Sahu PK (2015) Dynamic spatial partition density-based emergency message dissemination in VANETs. Veh Comm 2(4):208–222

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moussaoui B, Djahel S, Smati M, Murphy J (2017) A cross layer approach for efficient multimedia data dissemination in VANETs. Veh Comm 9:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  18. Namboodiri V, Gao L (2007) Prediction-based routing for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 56(4):2332–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taleb T, Sakhaee E, Hashimoto K, Jamalipour A, Kato N, Nemoto Y (2007) A stable routing protocol to support ITS services in VANET networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 56:3337–3347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Le D, Yao Y (2015) A cross-layer mobility handover scheme for IPv6-based vehicular networks. AEU Int J Electron Commun 69:1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Louazani A, Senouci S M, Bendaoud M A (2014) Clustering-based algorithm for connectivity maintenance in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2014 14th international conference on innovations for community services (I4CS) (pp. 34–38). IEEE

  22. Marzak B, Toumi H, Talea M, Benlahmar E (2015) Cluster head selection algorithm in vehicular ad hoc networks. In international conference on cloud technologies and applications (cloud-tech) (pp. 1–4)

  23. Marzak B, El Guemmat K, Benlahmar EH, Talea M (2016) Clustering in vehicular ad-hoc network using artificial neural network. Internat Rev Comput Softw (IRECOS) 11(6):548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dua A, Kumar N, Bawa S (2017) Reidd: reliability-aware intelligent data dissemination protocol for broadcast storm problem in vehicular ad hoc networks. Telecommun Syst 64(3):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dua A, Kumar N, Bawa S (2015) QoS-aware data dissemination for dense urban regions in vehicular ad hoc networks. Mob Netw Appl 20(6):773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dua A, Sharma P, Ganju S, Jindal A, Aujla G S, Kumar N, et al (2018) RoVAN: a rough set-based scheme for cluster head selection in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2018 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 206–212). IEEE

  27. Abbas F, Fan P (2018) Clustering-based reliable low-latency routing scheme using ACO method for vehicular networks. Veh Comm 12:66–74

    Google Scholar 

  28. Murugan NS, Devi GU (2019) Feature extraction using LR-PCA hybridization on twitter data and classification accuracy using machine learning algorithms. Clust Comput 22(6):13965–13974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murugan NS, Devi GU (2018) Detecting spams in social networks using ML algorithms-a review. Int J Environ Waste Manag 21(1):22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chitra M, Siva Sathya S (2017) SEIR epidemic spreading model to suppress broadcast storm in vehicular ad hoc networks. Int J Veh Saf 9:228–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eiter T, Füreder H, Kasslatter F, Parreira JX, Schneider P (2019) Towards a semantically enriched local dynamic map. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res 17(1):32–48

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Gao X, Wu W (2009) Algorithms for connected set cover problem and fault-tolerant connected set cover problem. Theor Comput Sci 410(8–10):812–817

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Manivannan D, Moni SS, Zeadally S (2020) Secure authentication and privacy-preserving techniques in vehicular ad-hoc NETworks (VANETs). Veh Comm 25:100247

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malhi AK, Batra S, Pannu HS (2020) Security of vehicular ad-hoc networks: a comprehensive survey. Comput Secur 89:101664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Awan KA, Din IU, Almogren A, Guizani M, Khan S (2020) StabTrust—A stable and centralized trust-based clustering mechanism for IoT enabled vehicular ad-hoc networks. Ieee Access 8:21159–21177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai, India

    D. N. S. Ravi Kumar & S. Barani

Authors
  1. D. N. S. Ravi Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Barani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. N. S. Ravi Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection: Special Issue on Network In Box, Architecture, Networking and Applications

Guest Editor: Ching-Hsien Hsu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, D.N.S.R., Barani, S. Epidemic and transmission priority based data dissemination model in vehichular adhoc networks (VANETs). Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 14, 2524–2536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01013-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01013-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation